Newsletter Subject

To save or kill a baby polar bear

From

npr.org

Email Address

email@nl.npr.org

Sent On

Thu, Oct 13, 2022 11:00 AM

Email Preheader Text

Appropriate metaphor for the economy? When is it a good thing to be provocative? Today we respond to

Appropriate metaphor for the economy? [View this email online]( [NPR Public Editor by Poynter's Kelly McBride]( When is it a good thing to be provocative? Today we respond to a listener’s critique of an analogy that compares central bankers’ raising interest rates to Berlin zookeepers’ decision whether to kill Knut the baby polar bear. If nothing else, it was memorable. But is that enough? In journalism, being provocative for the sake of being provocative is mere attention-getting. Being provocative on issues where the heat is already high in the public debate is counterproductive, because it has the same effect as throwing gasoline on a fire. Yet, there is room for language that is deliberately designed to stop news consumers in their tracks. The best time and place for provocation is when the subject matter is important but dull or abstract. Journalists who frequently deal with hard-to-grasp topics are most successful when they land an unforgettable metaphor that conveys both meaning and emotion. As it turns out, the Berlin zookeepers didn’t kill Knut, even though he had a disordered immune system and his mother rejected him. They were influenced by an overwhelming public outcry to keep the bear alive. The folks who first thought of this metaphor were hoping to generate a similar outcry over government bankers’ efforts to slow inflation, which will inevitably harm the economy. Read on to see if we thought it was a strong enough metaphor to lead off an episode of The Indicator from Planet Money. We also spotlight two stories: the first about the concept of the American dream, which blends photos and words to tell the story of immigrants’ struggles to make it into the United States, and the second an interview that looked into the life of a longtime Supreme Court artist. [JOHN MACDOUGALL/AFP via Getty Images]( JOHN MACDOUGALL/AFP via Getty Images [Illustration by Carlos Carmonamedina] Here are a few quotes from the Public Editor's inbox that resonated with us. Letters are edited for length and clarity. You can share your questions and concerns with us through the [NPR Contact page](. An insensitive comparison? Ashley Hillard wrote on Sept. 23: I am a regular listener of this show, but I found [this latest]( episode’s comparison of finance to whether or not a zoo in Berlin would kill a baby polar bear to be unbelievably crass. I actually had to turn off the story. I know animal metaphors are big in economics, but this one just really went too far. … In the referenced episode of The Indicator from Planet Money, co-host Darian Woods told the podcast audience about a baby polar bear named Knut born in the Berlin Zoo in 2006. Knut was rejected by his mother and needed 24-hour care and bottle-feeding to live. The bear also had an autoimmune disorder. A zookeeper said the bear should be euthanized. Co-host Wailin Wong told listeners that Knut was ultimately spared after protests and a media frenzy. Wong pivoted, “there’s a real point about economics to be made here.” Woods then told listeners about two economists at the investment company BlackRock who “are calling for a similar, loud public debate over whether to keep another baby polar bear alive. The baby polar bear in this metaphor is the economy.” The economists, Jean Boivin and Alex Brazier, wrote a Sept. 14 [blog post]( titled “Spare the bear: the inflation debate that should be happening,” which is where The Indicator found the Knut comparison. Wong further explained the dilemma for central bankers: “Do they keep the economy booming but risk inflation spiraling higher and higher? Or do they snuff out inflation now and suffocate the economy, too? In other words, do they kill the polar bear?” We asked The Indicator team about their decision to use Knut’s story as a metaphor for the economy. In an email, senior supervising editor Kate Concannon said her team wanted to call attention to the notable actions that the U.S. Federal Reserve is taking in response to inflation, which hit 40-year highs. “Economists are forecasting millions of people may lose their jobs in response to the Fed raising interest rates,” she said. “There was a loud public debate about whether Knut the polar bear should be euthanized. Yet so far the scale of the Fed’s response to the inflation mess we find ourselves in has not been the subject of widespread public debate. We are asking whether the speed of the Fed’s actions should have just as much — if not more — discussion, given what’s at stake.” Did comparing the economy to Knut the polar bear make this abstract subject more accessible to the NPR audience? Concannon said yes: “Analogies and striking images are useful to make the scale of the current economic quandary more real to our listeners.” In response to the idea that the comparison was crass, Concannon said she recognized that Knut’s situation was tragic, but so is the current situation that may await many American workers. In fact, [other]( newsrooms made use of the comparison. “The cliché goes that one death is a tragedy; one million is a statistic,” she said. “We want to help our listeners feel the fortunes of the millions as just as compelling and gripping as the fate of one polar bear.” In our view, the metaphor worked. Far from being insensitive, we found it to be a memorable, even helpful tool, for listeners seeking to understand the gravity of the current economic landscape. — Amaris Castillo [Illustration by Carlos Carmonamedina] The Public Editor spends a lot of time examining moments where NPR fell short. Yet we also learn a lot about NPR by looking at work that we find to be compelling and excellent journalism. Here we share a line or two about the pieces where NPR shines. The ‘American dream’ Last month, NPR published a [beautiful exploration]( of what the idea of the American dream means to today’s migrants. It was featured in a recent [newsletter]( from NPR’s Pablo Valdivia as part of a reflection on Hispanic Heritage Month. The story is available to read in English and Spanish. Many immigration stories of late have been about the politicization of migration, but this story offered more personal looks at the people trying to make their way into the U.S. Lilly Quiroz’s first-person introduction and Toya Sarno Jordan’s photos draw readers into the difficult and dramatic journeys of those featured in the reporting. — Emily Barske A Supreme Court artist’s life Art Lien, one of the most celebrated courtroom artists in the U.S., [spoke with]( NPR’s Scott Simon for Weekend Edition Saturday. Lien spent 45 years sketching Supreme Court hearings before retiring this summer. Simon asked Lien who at the Supreme Court had an especially difficult face to capture, and what he really feels about whether cameras should be in the courtroom. We won’t give away Lien’s answers here, but they’re fascinating. It’s a delightful and revelatory conversation that uncovers the curiosities of life as a Supreme Court artist. — Amaris Castillo The Office of the Public Editor is a team. Editor Kayla Randall, reporters Amaris Castillo and Emily Barske and copy editor Merrill Perlman make this newsletter possible. Illustrations are by Carlos Carmonamedina. We are still reading all of your messages on [Facebook]( [Twitter]( and [from our inbox](. As always, keep them coming. Kelly McBride NPR Public Editor Chair, [Craig Newmark Center for Ethics & Leadership at the Poynter Institute]( Kelly McBride Public Editor Kayla Randall NPR Amaris Castillo Poynter Institute Emily Barske Poynter Institute The Public Editor stands as a source of independent accountability. Created by NPR's board of directors, the Public Editor serves as a bridge between the newsroom and the audience, striving to both listen to the audience's concerns and explain the newsroom's work and ambitions. The office ensures NPR remains steadfast in its mission to present fair, accurate and comprehensive information in service of democracy. [Read more]( from the NPR Public Editor, [contact us]( or follow us on [Twitter](. You received this message because you're subscribed to Public Editor emails. This email was sent by National Public Radio, Inc., 1111 North Capitol Street NE, Washington, DC 20002 [Unsubscribe]( | [Privacy Policy]( [NPR logo]

Marketing emails from npr.org

View More
Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

24/06/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.