Newsletter Subject

What ever happened to chronological order?

From

npr.org

Email Address

email@nl.npr.org

Sent On

Fri, Aug 19, 2022 09:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

Plus: Better Call Saul, A League of Their Own, and more home makeovers by Linda Holmes Welcome! It w

Plus: Better Call Saul, A League of Their Own, and more home makeovers [View this email online]( [Pop Culture Happy Hour]( by Linda Holmes Welcome! It was the week when [layoffs hit]( the world of HBO. It was the week when Jonah Hill [drew a boundary](. And it was the week when a courtroom battle raged over [books, money, and art](. Let's get to it. Opening Argument: What ever happened to chronological order? I recently was prodded to engage in the fundamentally flawed but sort of entertaining exercise of putting together a list of what I considered the best television shows ever. Considering how many television shows any given person, even a critic, hasn't seen, it has its limitations, but I worked hard to balance impact, production quality, and -- crucially, to me -- consistency over time, which is where a lot of shows I have loved slipped in my rankings. The show that landed at number one surprised me, since I don't tend to be a big crime-drama person generally: It was Breaking Bad. This week marked the end of the Breaking Bad prequel-sequel Better Call Saul, which traced the story of attorney Jimmy McGill both before and after he worked for Walter White and other criminals in the persona of attorney Saul Goodman. I bring this up only because this seems like the ideal time to register a complaint that I admit sounds like one springing from the mind of a full-on crank: I long for chronological order. If you followed Breaking Bad itself, you saw mostly a single narrative, with occasional flashbacks. But Better Call Saul eventually was spread across several different time periods. There was a kind of prequel-to-the-prequel time when Jimmy was first becoming a lawyer, meeting Kim and so forth. There was what you might call the central narrative when he was a con man doing slip-and-falls and gradually falling in with Mike (Jonathan Banks) and Lalo (Tony Dalton) and other bad-news bears. There was material set during the events of Breaking Bad when we saw him interacting with Walt and Jesse. There was a period set after the end of Breaking Bad, when he was living a secret life as Gene, the Cinnabon manager. There were also times when the show flashed back within its own run, as in the series finale, which opened with a scene set during the events of Better Call Saul's season 5 episode "Bagman," a season and a half earlier. You can recognize the narrative impact of a well-placed flashback and still realize that at some point, there may be a limit to how much jumping around your brain can really hold on to before it starts to lose the central thread. [Critics before me have wrestled]( with the now extremely popular device of opening a show with a climactic, exciting scene and then going directly to the dreaded "SIX WEEKS EARLIER" or "TWO YEARS EARLIER" or "48 HOURS EARLIER" card. Designed to promise the audience that something interesting is going to happen if only they will be patient, it often acts as an artificial support structure for an underdeveloped story or a failure to create stakes. What's more, there are times when we eventually arrive at that climactic sequence where we began, and it turns out to be less climactic than one might expect. This happened in the final season of Ozark, which opened with a flash-forward to a seemingly devastating incident that, once we finally caught up with it, wasn't all that significant. It also happened in the Netflix series The Queen's Gambit, where we began with Beth (Anya Taylor-Joy) struggling to pull herself together after partying too much, but when we eventually got to that morning, it wasn't clear why the story would start there, other than to hook people with the promise of a downward spiral. This in medias res opening might be the most common reason for scrambled chronology, but it's not the only one. We also are deep into the era of the double (or more) timeline in all kinds of shows for all kinds of reasons: Yellowjackets, The Resort, Under The Banner of Heaven, Pachinko, This Is Us, Westworld ... it's quite a list. Sometimes this is to follow characters in younger versions, sometimes it involves a lot of old-age makeup, sometimes it's done as part of a sweeping epic meant to embrace world history. Maybe a person goes through a crisis while thinking back on their past -- that's what you get in the Netflix series Keep Breathing, in which a young woman who survives a plane crash reflects on her life while trying not to die in the wilderness. Maybe a real scandal is given a documentary-style framing device, as in The Dropout. None of this is, in and of itself, bad, and many of these shows are excellent. But it's also worth keeping in mind that a viewer's attention is finite, and now that the "how will we ever arrive at this action sequence?" trick has been used and reused, it doesn't work as well as it once did. I doubt I am the only viewer who watches and exciting opening scene, sees a "SIX MONTHS EARLIER" screen come up, and prepares to be bored for several episodes. So let me be the simple-minded person who says ... if you possibly can, just tell me the story. If it's not interesting at the beginning, it's probably not going to be interesting for eight or 10 or 13 episodes. Leave the tricky timelines to the people who use them very, very well. Don't make me constantly try to figure out what year it is with people's haircuts and clothes and how old various babies are. Tell me the story. I'm listening. --------------------------------------------------------------- Newsletter continues after sponsor message --------------------------------------------------------------- Listen to the Podcast Sponsor-Free Support your favorite pop culture junkies AND listen without sponsor interruptions with a subscription to [Pop Culture Happy Hour+]( Learn more and sign up at [plus.npr.org/happy](. We Recommend Speaking of Better Call Saul, we will have an episode about the finale, but along with that, enjoy Eric Deggans' [review for NPR](. Are you the kind of person who likes a quick home makeover with some nice stories about families and a very charismatic host? You might enjoy Netflix's feather-light Instant Dream Home, featuring Danielle Brooks. Vengeance, B.J. Novak's feature debut as a writer-director (and star), has arrived on demand after [a theatrical release a few weeks ago](. It's a story about a guy whose desire to start a podcast leads him down a very dark road, and while I'm not sure everything about it works, I admired its weirdness and its absolute skewering of certain media tendencies. What We Did This Week We [ran an encore]( of our Indian Matchmaking episode, with Bilal Qureshi and Priya Krishna, as the show launched its second season on Netflix. I talked to Katie Presley, Soraya McDonald and Kristen Meinzer about A League Of Their Own in two separate episodes -- [one about the new Amazon series]( and [one about the original movie](. (Note: Amazon is among NPR's financial supporters and also distributes certain NPR content.) Glen [talked to J.C. Howard and Cyrena Touros]( about the HBO Max series Harley Quinn. Aisha and Glen [talked to Eric Deggans]( about that Better Call Saul finale. What's Making Us Happy Every week on the show, we talk about some other things out in the world that have been giving us joy lately. Here they are: - What's making Eric Deggans happy: [Chaka Khan's new song "Woman Like Me"]( - What's making Glen Weldon happy: [Cult of the Lamb]( - What's making Aisha Harris happy: [Season 2 of P-Valley on Starz]( --------------------------------------------------------------- Stream your local NPR station. Visit NPR.org to find your local station stream. [Find a Station]( --------------------------------------------------------------- [Subscribe to Pop Culture Happy Hour+](. Your support helps make our show possible and unlocks access to our sponsor-free episodes. What do you think of today's email? We'd love to hear your thoughts, questions and feedback: [pchh@npr.org](mailto:pchh@npr.org?subject=Newsletter%20Feedback) Enjoying this newsletter? Forward to a friend! They can [sign up here](. Looking for more great content? [Check out all of our newsletter offerings]( — including Music, Books, Daily News and more! You received this message because you're subscribed to Pop Culture Happy Hour emails. This email was sent by National Public Radio, Inc., 1111 North Capitol Street NE, Washington, DC 20002 [Unsubscribe]( | [Privacy Policy]( [NPR logo]

Marketing emails from npr.org

View More
Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

24/06/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.