Newsletter Subject

Fame and food collide in 'Julia'

From

npr.org

Email Address

email@nl.npr.org

Sent On

Fri, Apr 1, 2022 03:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

Plus: 'Everything Everywhere All At Once' and what's making us happy! by Linda Holmes Welcome! It wa

Plus: 'Everything Everywhere All At Once' and what's making us happy! [View this email online]( [Pop Culture Happy Hour]( by Linda Holmes Welcome! It was the week when we said goodbye to [a beloved drummer](. It was the week when we learned more about [an anticipated prequel](. And it was the week when [Atlanta takes returned](. Let's get to it. Opening Argument: Fame and food collide in Julia I don't know whether Julia Child was uncomfortable being famous or not. I don't know whether she struggled with what we would now call parasocial relationships with her viewers or not. But the new HBO MAX series Julia is, more than any other single thing, about this. It posits that for a woman who was well into middle age when she became a capital-P Personality, that transition was uncomfortable and complicated – and not always one she managed gracefully. Played in this series by Sarah Lancashire, Julia Child had been employed in the intelligence world before she published Mastering the Art of French Cooking in 1961, when she was almost 50. A couple of years later, an appearance on WGBH in Boston led to the creation of The French Chef, her public television show that ran for ten years. While Julie & Julia, the book that became the movie that is probably the best-known rendition of Child's life, focused on the time before the publication of Mastering, Julia follows the early part of her television career, and thus a different period of her life: She was already highly successful because of the book; this is the time when she became not only successful but famous. The television kind of famous, not the book kind – and those were very different, even in the 1960s. This is complicated by the fact that in this telling, Child's husband Paul (David Hyde Pierce) doesn't really approve of television; he is an old-fashioned snob when the story begins. It's only because he is so devoted to her – and because of what they're both convinced television can do to educate people – that he accepts that perhaps doing public TV would be okay. The irony is that at the same time Paul Child thinks his wife is above being on television, much of the staff at WGBH thinks public television is high-minded and should be above airing what they see as a cooking show for housewives. So to a great degree, this series is about cultural adjustments that working with audiences can require: Child adjusting to being a television personality, and public television adjusting to a different idea of what its viewers really want. (Jefferson Mays plays Albert Duhamel, the host of I've Been Reading who first puts Child on television to demonstrate making an omelet; his show about books and authors is more what the station thinks of as its bread and butter BJC – Before Julia Child.) As a show about Julia Child the person, I'm not sure how much Julia adds to what we already know of her – her passionate partnership with her husband, her life in France before she published books, her history in the intelligence community. It's certainly different to look at the most successful segment of someone's life as opposed to the underdog segment that Julie & Julia focused on, given that the latter lends itself more easily to the sympathy and rooting interest that people often prefer in their stories (especially their stories about women). But what this series explores that perhaps I hadn't seen is that Child has some ambivalence about how instantly viewers in this story feel entitled to pieces of her -- of her attention, her time, her personal life. (You’ll recognize this entitlement as an element of what people now often call parasocial relationships.) She begins her television career advocating hard for herself, offering to pay the expenses of her own show. But she becomes frustrated by the punishing production schedule -- particularly once the show begins to be sold to other local public TV stations -- and exhausted by the inability to retreat into her marriage, the relationship in which she's most comfortable, once everyone knows who she is. She enjoys recognition and attention, she wants success, she wants people to think she's great at her job. But she wants to be able to take breaks from being Julia Child The Star to be Julia Child The Person, and she realizes that isn't really one of her choices. Furthermore, here, Julia isn't always gracious in her dealings with other people. Even with Paul, whom she adores, she can be impatient. Her producers can feel unappreciated, and her friends can feel ignored. Her book editor, the famous Judith Jones (Fiona Glascott), treasures their personal and professional relationships, and she grieves a little as television becomes more and more the focus of Child's career. There's a solid argument that's been made elsewhere that there was no need for another piece about Julia Child, and that there are countless other interesting chefs who could have been the focus of a series like this, and that's true. But it's also true that Child occupies a pretty rarefied space if what you're trying to get at is the history of the celebrity food personality, specifically on television, and specifically in this kind of home-cook-oriented demonstration setting. So there's more justification, I think, to have made this show than there would have been a straight biopic. Are there lots of brilliant chefs who led fascinating lives and changed the world of food? Absolutely. But are there lots of TV hosts who stand at the same place Julia Child did at the intersection of changing media, who navigated the adjustment to fame when they were much older than most food personalities who become famous now? There are certainly less, and that made the show feel less repetitive to me. You won't necessarily learn a lot of new facts about Julia Child from this show, but you might see dramatic moments that ask you to focus on different things about her than other treatments have, and some of them might pop up again and surprise you in contexts well outside the kitchen. --------------------------------------------------------------- Newsletter continues after sponsor message --------------------------------------------------------------- We Recommend: [I enjoyed this retrospective]( about the Chicago era of The A.V. Club, the Onion's entertainment section, which features lots of writers I like -- including my co-host, Stephen Thompson. You know Wordle and maybe even Quordle ... but do you know [Duotrigordle]( Obviously, I’m addition to our coverage, there was an awful lot of writing about Will Smith and Chris Rock. If you’re still processing that story, some of the really good thinking I read this week came from [Roxane Gay]( [Wesley Morris]( and [Soraya Nadia McDonald](. What We Did This Week: [Stephanie Hsu, Michelle Yeoh, and Ke Huy Quan in Everything Everywhere All At Once, the latest film directed by the Daniels.]( Allyson Riggs/A24 Naturally, we sat down late on Oscar night and [wrapped up the ceremony](. As you can imagine, the fact that somebody got hit was the headline, but we also talked about some big wins and some takeaways. I also wrote for NPR about how the [night took a turn](. Aisha visited Morning Edition to [share some thoughts]( about the whole thing. NPR’s own Eric Deggans [weighed in as well](. Glen [talked to our friend Cate Young]( about the Netflix show Human Resources. I talked to [Barrie Hardymon, Bedatri D. Choudhury, and Sofie Hernandez-Simeonidis]( about the second season of Bridgerton. Stephen and Aisha and I all [got a kick out of]( the Sandra Bullock/Channing Tatum romantic comedy The Lost City. And [Aisha talked with Andrew Limbong and Mallory Yu]( about Everything Everywhere All At Once. [Glen wrote a review]( of Moon Knight. I published [last week's newsletter essay]( about Is It Cake?, and brought that crucial discussion to NPR's All Things Considered. After we learned about Bruce Willis stepping away from acting, [I took a look at]( his long and interesting career. [Stephen wrote up]( the Madi Diaz Tiny Desk (Home) Concert for NPR Music. What's Making Us Happy: Every week on the show, we talk about some other things out in the world that have been giving us joy lately. Here they are: - What's making Andrew happy: [Q-Less]( - What's making Mallory happy: [Juana’s conversation]( about Sailor Moon on All Things Considered - What's making Aisha happy: [Box Office Game]( --------------------------------------------------------------- Stream your local NPR station. Visit NPR.org to find your local station stream. [Find a Station]( --------------------------------------------------------------- [Subscribe to Pop Culture Happy Hour+](. Your support helps make our show possible and unlocks access to our sponsor-free episodes. What do you think of today's email? We'd love to hear your thoughts, questions and feedback: [pchh@npr.org](mailto:pchh@npr.org?subject=Newsletter%20Feedback) Enjoying this newsletter? Forward to a friend! They can [sign up here](. Looking for more great content? [Check out all of our newsletter offerings]( — including Music, Books, Daily News and more! You received this message because you're subscribed to Pop Culture Happy Hour emails. This email was sent by National Public Radio, Inc., 1111 North Capitol Street NE, Washington, DC 20002 [Unsubscribe]( | [Privacy Policy]( [NPR logo]

Marketing emails from npr.org

View More
Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

24/06/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.