Newsletter Subject

Where Are We Going, And How Many Episodes Will It Take?

From

npr.org

Email Address

email@nl.npr.org

Sent On

Fri, Aug 20, 2021 03:58 PM

Email Preheader Text

Plus: 'The White Lotus' finale, new Lorde, and What is Making Us Happy! by Linda Holmes Welcome! It

Plus: 'The White Lotus' finale, new Lorde, and What is Making Us Happy! [View this email online]( [Pop Culture Happy Hour]( by Linda Holmes Welcome! It was the week when the [concert tour cancellations]( continued to roll in. (Please get vaccinated if you haven't already.) It was the week when we [said farewell to Sonny Chiba](. And it was the week when we learned a little more about [the next Captain America ... maybe]( Let's get to it. Opening Argument: Where Are We Going, And How Many Episodes Will It Take? The Hulu series Nine Perfect Strangers, which is based on the Liane Moriarty novel, has Nicole Kidman among its stars and David E. Kelley as one of its producers. That makes it a fairly direct follow-up to HBO's Big Little Lies, the last Moriarty adaptation to make a big splash. It's about a wellness retreat (Kidman plays the sort of guru) and the nine well-off people who wind up there. The cast includes not only Kidman but also Melissa McCarthy, Bobby Cannavale, Michael Shannon, and Manny "[BORTLES!]( Jacinto. It's a formidable arrangement of folks. Hulu sent critics some, but not all, of the episodes. There are ten, and they sent critics six. Those six episodes give all these good actors a lot of time to show off, for sure. McCarthy gets a chance to play a significantly more grounded character than she usually does; she's a novelist who's fallen on hard times and is heading to the retreat to get some rest. (She will learn the retreat is not really very restful.) I watched the first couple of hours of it with interest, just because of the cast, even though the Kidman performance seemed a little over the top, but then I just ... ran out of interest. And without the opportunity to binge it through to the end, I didn't have the patience to figure out where, if anywhere, they were going with this. There's an upcoming series (embargoed until Monday, unfortunately) that did roughly the same thing to me: the premise had me, and then it just became clear that it was going to take too many episodes to get there. Sometimes this leaves the impression that the thing should have been a movie, but sometimes it just means it should have been, say, four episodes rather than the more common six, eight, or ten. You've heard the Great British Baking Show judges talk about a tart with a soggy bottom, right? (Maybe you haven't; just take my word for it.) This is the problem of the series with the soggy middle: two good first episodes and maybe one good closing episode (of course, I don't know if that applies to Nine Perfect Strangers, since I haven't seen the end), and then some number of water-treading middle chapters. It's made me reflect on the way that watching episodes that go in a particular order can really, really affect how you see a show. Some limited series with ten episodes will focus on the most boring person in the story for, say, four episodes, and then switch gears to something much better in the fifth. What happens if only the first five episodes are released for review? (I have watched shows where this, or something close to this, has happened. I watched one ... yesterday.) Do you review it as "four boring ones and a much better one, and presumably maybe four more that are less boring"? It unravels the idea, among other things, that a show is one thing: either a mess or masterfully done from beginning to end, every episode well thought out or poorly thought out. A ten-episode show can follow any number of tracks: start great and get dull; start dull and get great; start and end great and be dull in the middle; start and end dull and be great in the middle. And when you're only seeing a piece of it, but it's the piece the network has chosen to show you, figuring out where you are in that range is awfully difficult. I don't know how the series Nine Perfect Strangers ends. I know how the book ends. I don't know whether, as with Big Little Lies, they will try to find a path forward for another season. I passed a couple of pleasurable hours watching actors I think are great bounce around in an interesting location. But is it good? Is it really, genuinely good? I don't know. It got soggy in the middle, but maybe it ends up as a perfect bite. --------------------------------------------------------------- Newsletter continues after sponsor message --------------------------------------------------------------- We Recommend: I can't say enough about Claire McNear's [reporting at The Ringer]( about the unfolding Jeopardy! situation. That's not to say there haven't been other people who have worked on it, but she's really taken this story on as a project, and it's benefited a lot of other journalists. Just -- just -- as this newsletter was going to "print," [news broke]( that Mike Richards had decided to step down as host, although he'll apparently still be the executive producer for the time being. But seriously, for recommendation hunters: [Hulu’s Nine Perfect Strangers]( is, for the reasons stated above, a bit of a gamble at this point. It isn’t always as compelling as I wish it were, but great performances from that cast that includes Melissa McCarthy, Michael Shannon and Bobby Cannavale mean that even if you don't stick with it, you'll get a few scenes that you'll probably remember. We’ll be covering the FX on Hulu series [Reservation Dogs]( on the podcast soon, and it’s well worth catching up on in the meantime. You probably know by now whether you like the [Wondery podcast Dr. Death]( or not. It has its own style, its own flavor. If you use it for company while cleaning, as I do, be aware that they’ve started a new season, and you’ll never guess: It’s about a bad doctor. (Also, while it surrenders to the regrettable impulse to put a hot actor in a fat suit, the recent [Peacock TV adaptation]( of the first season, starring Joshua Jackson, Christian Slater and Alec {NAME}, isn't bad if you're looking for a true crime binge.) What We Did This Week! [Lorde image]( Ophelia Mikkelson/Courtesy of the artist [On Monday]( LaTesha Harris and Carlos Aguilar talked with me and Stephen about the Sundance hit CODA, now streaming on Apple TV+. On Tuesday, [we shared an encore episode]( about cover songs, featuring Stephen, Glen and me, along with our pal Barrie Hardymon. On Wednesday, I had great fun [talking to critic Walter Chaw]( about the totally average, rather forgettable, but -- for me -- ultimately entertaining Netflix thriller Beckett. You can also read a review from me at that link. [On Thursday]( Glen talked to Bedatri D. Choudhury about the series Brand New Cherry Flavor. And on Friday, you can hear a conversation Stephen had with Ann Powers, LaTesha Harris and Cyrena Touros [about the new Lorde album Solar Power](. [I wrote up some thoughts]( about The White Lotus, now that we've seen how it plays out. I [also wrote about]( the Mike Richards issue at Jeopardy! (a piece based on last week's newsletter essay) -- but remember, that was a whole host-job resignation and cycle of reporting ago. As I do every week, I wrote about [this week's Ted Lasso]( which is a salute to one of my favorite things: the romantic comedy. And find Stephen [over at New Music Friday]( spinning some tunes for NPR Music. What's Making Us Happy: Every week on the show, we talk about some other things out in the world that have been giving us joy lately. Here they are: - What's making LaTesha Harris happy: [The book Normal People]( by Sally Rooney (and [the Hulu series]( - What's making Cyrena Touros happy:[“Amaneki” by Sweet William and Ichiko Aoba]( - What's making Ann Powers happy: [Reservation Dogs on FX on Hulu]( - What's making Stephen Thompson happy: [“Hypnodancer” by Little Big]( --------------------------------------------------------------- Stream your local NPR station. Visit NPR.org to find your local station stream. --------------------------------------------------------------- What do you think of today's email? We'd love to hear your thoughts, questions and feedback: [pchh@npr.org](mailto:pchh@npr.org?subject=Newsletter%20Feedback) Enjoying this newsletter? Forward to a friend! They can [sign up here](. Looking for more great content? [Check out all of our newsletter offerings]( — including Music, Books, Daily News and more! You received this message because you're subscribed to Pop Culture Happy Hour emails. This email was sent by National Public Radio, Inc., 1111 North Capitol Street NE, Washington, DC 20002 [Unsubscribe]( | [Privacy Policy]( [NPR logo]

Marketing emails from npr.org

View More
Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

24/06/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.