Newsletter Subject

Seven Strangers, Picked To Live In A Loft, And Me

From

npr.org

Email Address

email@nl.npr.org

Sent On

Fri, Mar 5, 2021 04:59 PM

Email Preheader Text

Plus: WandaVision, Raya And The Last Dragon, and What's Making Us Happy by Linda Holmes Welcome! It

Plus: WandaVision, Raya And The Last Dragon, and What's Making Us Happy by Linda Holmes Welcome! It was the week when New York prepared to reopen movie theaters, and a good number of [New Yorkers said ... yikes](. It was the week when the cater-waiters of Party Down [got a reprieve](. And it was the week when [Alec {NAME} decided on a little break]( from Twitter. Let's get to it. Opening Argument: Seven Strangers, Picked To Live In A Loft, And Me I was fascinated by the first season of The Real World in 1992. I was right around the age of the participants, and they were having all these spirited arguments and displaying all kinds of interpersonal dynamics that I just couldn’t stop staring at, when they were happy and when they were miserable. This presaged not only my general curiosity about (mostly non-trainwreck) reality shows, but my fondnesses for true crime, documentaries that observe individual people closely, and even narrative podcasting. It’s hard to explain now, if you were not tuned in then -- before The Bachelor, before Survivor, before so much else -- that this was not the Real World of later years, with the hot tubs and the extravagantly reckless and raucous behavior and so forth. It was a very earnest show then, even though the motivations behind its creation were obviously savvy and mercenary. The cast cared conspicuously (to varying degrees) about politics and racism and war and abortion rights and homelessness, and they argued in ways that were interesting and clueless, insightful and awful. They’ve now been brought back together almost 30 years later for a reunion series called The Real World: Homecoming on Paramount+, which is essentially CBS All Access with a new coat of paint. Taped during pandemic times (which cost them the physical presence of then-model, now-wellness-spiritual-journey-guy Eric Nies, who joins them virtually), the show follows them through a few days spent together and finds them all ... well, 30 years older. Some have kids, some have had professional success in the fields they were pursuing back then, some have changed direction entirely. It appears that they’ve gotten together in certain combinations over the years, and they’ve stayed connected to each other in some ways, but that some of them fell out of touch with each other on an individual level for a couple of decades. (In case you need a refresher, they were at the time: Julie, the dancer; Kevin, the writer; Becky, the singer; Andre, the rocker; Norman, the artist; Heather, the rapper. Plus Eric, the ... well, as previously mentioned.) That they were seven creative types sometimes doesn't even make it into the descriptions of that first season, so quickly did the idea that the show was specifically about young artists fall away in future seasons. Previews suggest that the conversation during the reunion will turn back to race, which drove some of the most remembered arguments back then. Kevin Powell, a writer both then and now, found himself discussed and dismissed in some of the coverage of the show at the time as — in the words of the cast — the “angry black man,” and he clearly brought to this reunion a (very reasonable) desire to ask the rest of the cast to reconsider, among other things, their frequent insistence in 1992 that he was overstating the importance of race to the interpersonal goings-on in the loft. How people who are 50-ish now will reckon with the things they said and did when they were 20-ish ... it's not clear that's going to go well based on what we’ve seen so far. Even in the best of circumstances (which these aren't), it's a tall order for people to attain true and mature distance from their old behavior when they've gotten to watch it on television and have everyone bring it up to them -- both what they did and what was done to them -- regularly for three decades. It’s interesting, as somebody who found this all so intriguing 30 years ago, to see that it’s still intriguing to me in a very different way. I was so into it then, the idea that they were all figuring stuff out and getting to know a variety of people and chasing various dreams and being stuck together whether they wanted to be or not. (One feature of early Real World seasons that I now find very amusing is that they frequently had a participant or two whose presence kind of nope-d out of the whole thing for much of the season, whether because they weren’t dramatic enough to show or, perhaps, because they decided to stay as far away from the madness as possible.) Now, I see in it my own efforts to reckon with the choices I’ve made for 30 years, and the things I have done and haven’t done for people, and what I have learned and am still trying to learn. If you’d asked me in 1992 what I thought it would mean to be 50, I’d have realized it was roughly my parents’ age, and I’d have said that by then, I’d be a pretty fully formed person, the human being I would be forever. I’d have expected to have learned most of my big lessons and gotten my relationships to calm down and stop shifting, and I’d expect to have many fewer feelings about everything, because I would have achieved my final form, whatever it was. Of all the things I thought in 1992, that might have been the goofiest, and I can assure you that I thought some goofy things. Now, looking at these people, I’m not remotely surprised that they’re different but the same, still with some of the same limitations in their perspectives that they had in 1992, even though they’ve learned a lot and experienced a lot. They do find new things to connect over — their kids, their shifting dreams, and especially their memories of a shared experience that’s impossible to really explain to anybody else. They can't even truly explain it to people who were on this show or shows like this later. Those people knew, in a way that they did not, what to expect. But they’re still all works in progress, quite obviously, and that’s maybe the most relatable thing of all. --------------------------------------------------------------- Newsletter continues after sponsor message --------------------------------------------------------------- We Recommend: If you're looking for a psychological thriller to read with some publishing-world intrigue, you might try Alexandra Andrews' Who Is Maud Dixon? It's about a young woman who blows up her career and stumbles into a job as the assistant to a mysterious author who writes under a pseudonym. The story takes them to a lot of places, both geographical and psychological, and it's quite a ride. I didn't take the time for a review of the Netflix documentary series Murder Among The Mormons, but while that title makes it sound extremely salacious, it's actually about documents and document forgery, as well as the importance of documents within the Mormon church. I found it quite fascinating, even if I wanted to know perhaps a little more about some things and less about other things. On our Minari episode, E. Alex Jung talked about his [profile of the actress]( Youn Yuh-jung. It's live in Vulture -- don't miss it. I also liked the Netflix documentary Made You Look, which is about art fraud. Basically, lots of fraud in my viewing habits right now. I love schemers. What We Did This Week: [Regina King image]( Andrew H. Walker/BEI/Shutterstock First, a request: We are doing a show about the best Muppets, and we need you to vote for which Muppet you think is best. (You can vote for up to three.) Find the poll at [npr.org/muppets](. (Obviously.) It was the great Aisha Harris who got the honor of [writing up the Golden Globes]( on Sunday night, and [Glen and I were delighted to join her]( for a late-night conversation about them. Thanks as always to our editor and our producer, Jessica Reedy and Candice Lim, for helping make the late-night show happen. [On Tuesday's show]( Aisha chatted with Jamelle Bouie of The New York Times about The United States v. Billie Holiday and the legacy of law enforcement. [On Wednesday's show]( Stephen and I talked about three great documentaries -- none of which are devastatingly traumatic -- that you can stream right now. [On Thursday's show]( Aisha and I were joined by Odie Henderson to kick off a series we're calling Essentials: a look at some of our favorite performances by some of our favorite performers. First up, Odie and Aisha and I talk about Regina King. Aisha [wrote about the movie]( Coming 2 America, and she also [sat down with our pals]( Brittany Luse and Eric Eddings to discuss it on our Friday show. [I wrote about the Netflix movie]( Moxie, which is based on the YA novel and was directed by Amy Poehler. [Glen wrote about the new Netflix series]( (I know, it's a Netflix-y week; they're very dominant right now) Pacific Rim: The Black. Glen [also covered the Disney movie]( Raya and the Last Dragon, which he enjoyed (and about which he recommends checking out a variety of critics). I wrote [some quick thoughts]( about WandaVision from my not-that-much-a-Marvel-person perspective; watch for some thoughts from actual Marvel person and NPR TV critic Eric Deggans later on Friday. [Stephen also appeared this week]( on New Music Friday over at NPR Music, and who doesn't like new music? What's Making Us Happy: Every week on the show, we talk about some other things out in the world that have been giving us joy lately. Here they are: - What's making Brittany happy: [Better Things]( - What's making Eric happy: [Discovery Plus]( and [Ready to Love]( - What's making Aisha happy: [Anthony Hopkins dancing on Twitter]( --------------------------------------------------------------- Stream your local NPR station. Visit NPR.org to find your local station stream. --------------------------------------------------------------- What do you think of today's email? We'd love to hear your thoughts, questions and feedback: [pchh@npr.org](mailto:pchh@npr.org?subject=Newsletter%20Feedback) Enjoying this newsletter? Forward to a friend! They can [sign up here](. Looking for more great content? [Check out all of our newsletter offerings]( — including Music, Books, Daily News and more! You received this message because you're subscribed to Pop Culture Happy Hour emails. This email was sent by National Public Radio, Inc., 1111 North Capitol Street NE, Washington, DC 20002 [Unsubscribe]( | [Privacy Policy]( [NPR logo]

EDM Keywords (211)

years wrote writing writes writer would world works words well week wednesday ways way watch war wanted wandavision vulture vote virtually variety tuned tuesday touch today time thursday thoughts thought think things thanks television talked talk take survivor subscribed stumbles still stay specifically somebody sign show series sent seen see said roughly ride review reunion rest request reprieve relationships regularly refresher recommend reckon received realized ready read racism race quite quickly psychological pseudonym profile presaged possible poll politics places perspectives perhaps people party participants participant paramount overstating odie nope netflix need muppet much mormons model miss miserable might message mercenary memories maybe madness made love lot looking look loft live little limitations less legacy learned learn later know kinds kids kick joins joined join job interesting impossible importance idea human honor homelessness hear hard happy gotten got goofiest going glen getting get geographical friend frequently fraud found forth forever fondnesses finds find fields fell fascinated explain experienced expected expect everything especially enjoyed email efforts editor drove done documents displaying dismissed discussed discuss directed different descriptions delighted decided decades critics creation coverage couple cost conversation connect clear circumstances choices cast case career calm blows best based bachelor awful assure assistant asked ask argued appears amusing always aisha age actually achieved access 50 1992

Marketing emails from npr.org

View More
Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

24/06/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.