Newsletter Subject

What Is Your Time Worth?

From

npr.org

Email Address

email@nl.npr.org

Sent On

Tue, Dec 8, 2020 12:02 PM

Email Preheader Text

A new study might have an answer Was this forwarded to you? Subscribe to and to . A Day Late And 456

A new study might have an answer Was this forwarded to you? Subscribe to [this newsletter]( and to [our podcasts](. A Day Late And 456 Dollars Short?! --------------------------------------------------------------- by Greg Rosalsky Benjamin Franklin, in between spending time flying kites and visiting prostitutes, noted that time is money in a 1748 essay titled “Advice to a Young Tradesman.” Thanks, Ben. Good insight. But time is how much money? Like, actually. How much money is time worth? The question actually really matters, especially for the government. Before pursuing projects, governments weigh costs and benefits to figure out if they’re worth doing. And for many types of projects, especially those having to do with roads or bridges or railways, one of the biggest benefits is time saved. It’s why the US Department of Transportation has [spent a lot of time]( trying to figure out how much time is worth. It helps them figure out where to spend taxpayer dollars. For people like truckers, the calculation is kinda easy. They say the value of an hour saved on the road is just how much they get paid per hour. It makes sense. But for people off the clock and driving for personal reasons, the calculation gets more complicated. In 1997, [the DOT]( using the best available research at the time, came up with a formula for valuing personal travel time: half of what the typical household makes per hour. That works out to about $14 today. Yep, if you’re driving to a park to, like, drink a couple White Claws with your friends or whatever, the DOT says every hour on the road is worth about $14. A [new study]( sponsored by the rideshare company Lyft conducted experiments on 3.7 million customers — and it suggests that the government has it wrong. The authors, Ariel Goldszmidt, John A. List, Robert D. Metcalfe, Ian Muir, V. Kerry Smith, and Jenny Wang, are a mix of academic economists and employees of Lyft, and most of them recently hopped on a Zoom call with us to spend some time talking about their time study. Pixabay Having a platform like Lyft to mess around with is kind of an economist’s dream. The team was able to conduct experiments on millions of Lyft rides in nine American cities (before the pandemic). They tweaked prices and wait times to test when users requested and didn’t request rides. Then, they were able to suss out how much people are willing to pay to wait less for their rides. It’s a cool way to measure how people value their time. For a long time, economists have relied on surveys of people in which they’re asked questions equivalent to, “How much would you pay to save 5 minutes?” People in these surveys may not accurately give the value of their time because it’s only a hypothetical. But Lyft’s data has information on the actual decisions that people make about how they value their time. If Lyft makes you wait 5 minutes more for your ride, will you take it? What if it charges you more for a shorter wait? Lyft has an interest in answering these questions because they want to fine-tune their pricing strategy to make the most money. After crunching the numbers, the researchers found a precise estimate for the average value of time in the nine cities they studied: $19 an hour. “The value of time that we estimate is significantly larger than what the US government values people's time at,” Metcalfe says. The researchers also found that the people’s value of time shifts throughout the day. "We do find that the value of time is 50% larger in peak commute in time versus non-peak commute in time.” It makes sense. During commute time, minutes matter. People don’t want to be late to work. The researchers also find that the value of saving minutes on rides increases when it’s raining or snowing — because waiting in the rain or snow sucks. Now, regarding their overall estimate of the average value of time, we should note that their experiments were conducted in nine of the richest urban areas in America: New York City, Boston, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Atlanta, Miami, San Diego, Austin, and Seattle. These are bustling areas where people have disposable income and business meetings or dinner reservations where being five minutes late can matter. Plus, they're the type of people who pay for taxis. This likely skews their estimates upwards. The researchers said they took pains to address this by adjusting their sample to match nationally representative surveys done by the government, and they say they are confident in their findings. “We think that right now policymakers are underestimating your time,” Metcalfe says. “They're not giving it the full weight that you fully give it. And that's important for how we think about how the government should spend money. The benefits of any government projects that reduce wait time or journey time might not be valued correctly.” Maybe it’s time to change how we value time. --------------------------------------------------------------- Newsletter continues after sponsor message --------------------------------------------------------------- On Our Podcasts --------------------------------------------------------------- How The Rat Blew Up — Unions have been putting giant inflatable rats in front of businesses for years. Now businesses are trying to deflate them, in court. [Listen here]( Before The Shot In The Arm — Inventing a vaccine for COVID-19 was hard, but getting billions of doses to billions of people is going to be even harder. [Listen here]( The Economics of America's Nurse Shortage — Early in the pandemic, there were national shortages of protective equipment and hospital supplies. Now, there's a shortage of nurses. [Listen here]( Also on The Indicator: [Jobs Friday: The Four Labor Markets]( [The Beigies: Some Economic Bright Spots]( and [What Biden Could Do On Immigration]( --------------------------------------------------------------- Stream your local NPR station. Visit NPR.org to find your local station stream. --------------------------------------------------------------- What do you think of today's email? We'd love to hear your thoughts, questions and feedback: [planetmoney@npr.org](mailto:planetmoney@npr.org?subject=Newsletter%20Feedback) Enjoying this newsletter? Forward to a friend! They can [sign up here](. Looking for more great content? [Check out all of our newsletter offerings]( — including Daily News, Politics, Health and more! You received this message because you're subscribed to Planet Money emails. This email was sent by National Public Radio, Inc., 1111 North Capitol Street NE, Washington, DC 20002 [Unsubscribe]( | [Privacy Policy]( [NPR logo]

Marketing emails from npr.org

View More
Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

24/06/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.