Newsletter Subject

Why Reopening Isn’t Enough To Save The Economy

From

npr.org

Email Address

email@nl.npr.org

Sent On

Tue, Jun 23, 2020 11:02 AM

Email Preheader Text

A blockbuster new study digs into the economics of the pandemic. Was this forwarded to you? Subscrib

A blockbuster new study digs into the economics of the pandemic. Was this forwarded to you? Subscribe to [this newsletter]( and to [our podcasts](. Rich People, Please Spend Your Money Again --------------------------------------------------------------- by Greg Rosalsky Brooklyn Heights sits across the East River from lower Manhattan. It’s filled with multimillion-dollar brownstones and — usually — Range Rovers, Teslas, and BMWs. These days it’s easy to find parking. The brownstones are mostly dark at night. The place is a ghost town. And the neighborhood's sushi restaurants, pilates studios, bistros, and wine bars are either closed or mostly empty. It’s a microcosm for what’s been the driver of the pandemic recession: rich people have stopped going out, destroying millions of jobs. That’s one of the key insights of [a blockbuster study]( that was dropped late last week by a gang of economists led by Harvard’s Raj Chetty. If you don’t know who Raj Chetty is, he’s sort of like the Michael Jordan of policy wonks. He’s a star economist. He and his colleagues assemble and crunch massive datasets and deliver insights that regularly shift core economic debates about inequality and opportunity. This new study focuses on the economic impact of COVID-19 and the government response. To us nerds, this is like Game 7 of the NBA Finals, and Chetty just swooped in at a crucial moment to drop some threes. Photo Credit: Opportunity Insights On the day the study came out, Chetty participated in a Zoom webinar sponsored by Princeton University’s Bendheim Center for Finance. Dressed in a white-collared shirt with bookshelves as his background, Chetty took us all through the study. The data? Good lord. They’ve assembled several gigantic new datasets from private companies, including credit and debit card processors and national payroll companies. The data is all [freely available online]( updated in real time, and presented in an easily digestible form. Chetty and his team have crunched it all to give some precise insights about consumer spending, jobs, and the geographic impact of the crisis. The study represents an advance for economics as a science, and it’s got some bombshells. First up, consumer spending. Typically, Chetty said, recessions are driven by a drop in spending on durable goods, like refrigerators, automobiles, and computers. This recession is different. It’s driven primarily by a decline in spending at restaurants, hotels, bars, and other service establishments that require in-person contact. We kinda already knew that. But what their data shows is this decline in spending is mostly in rich zip codes, whose businesses saw a 70% drop off in their revenue. That compares to a 30% drop in revenue for businesses in poorer zip codes. Second, jobs. This 70% fall in revenue at businesses in rich zip codes led them to lay off nearly 70% of their employees. These are mostly low-wage workers. Businesses in poorer zip codes laid off about 30% of their employees. The bottom line, Chetty said in his presentation, is that “reductions in spending by the rich have led to loss in jobs mostly for low-income individuals working in affluent areas.” Third, the government rescue effort. They find it’s mostly failed. The $500 billion Payroll Protection Program, which has given forgivable loans to businesses with fewer than 500 employees, doesn’t appear to have done much to save jobs. When the researchers compare the employment trends of businesses with fewer than 500 employees to those with more, the smaller businesses eligible for PPP don’t see a relative boost after the program went into effect. It looks like the program didn’t do its job of saving jobs. Meanwhile, the stimulus checks, while increasing spending, did not have much stimulative effect because the spending mostly flowed to big companies like Amazon and Walmart. The money didn’t flow to the rich zip code, in-person service businesses most affected by the downturn. Overall, the federal rescue package, they find, has failed to rescue the businesses and jobs getting hammered most by the pandemic. Finally, there’s state-ordered reopenings: they don’t seem to boost the economy either. They compare, for example, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Minnesota ordered “reopening” weeks before Wisconsin, but if you look at spending patterns in both two states, Minnesota did not see any boost compared to Wisconsin after it reopened. “The fundamental reason that people seem to be spending less is not because of state-imposed restrictions,” Chetty said. “It’s because high-income folks are able to work remotely, are choosing to self isolate, and are being cautious given health concerns. And unless you fundamentally address that concern, I think there’s limited capacity to restart the economy.” Chetty on Zoom call, showing spending trends in Minnesota and Wisconsin While rich people are scared of the virus, they won’t go out and spend money and workers in the service sector will continue to suffer. Low-income workers — especially those whose jobs focused on providing services in rich urban areas — are in for a period of turbulence. Many of these workers are getting a lifeline in the form of unemployment insurance, but some of these benefits will expire soon if the federal government doesn’t act. Economists have learned from previous shocks like this that the labor market doesn’t just easily adjust to them. Workers have a hard time moving and retraining. For example, after [over a million manufacturing jobs]( evaporated in the Rust Belt with the explosion of Chinese imports in the early 2000s, people stayed in the places that lost jobs, failed to get new ones, and many of them, in despair, ended up turning to alcohol and opioids with tragic results. Chetty and his team conclude that the traditional tools of economic policy — tax cuts and spending increases to boost demand — won’t save the army of the unemployed. Instead, they say we need public health efforts to restore safety and convince consumers it’s okay to start going out again. Until then, they argue, we need to extend unemployment benefits and provide assistance to help low-income workers who will continue to struggle in the pandemic economy. Next month, the federally funded unemployment benefits passed by Congress to help Americans during the pandemic are [set to expire](. This groundbreaking study provides a strong case to Washington to think about extending them. --------------------------------------------------------------- Newsletter continues after sponsor message --------------------------------------------------------------- On Our Podcasts --------------------------------------------------------------- Planet Money is now on Tiktok! You can watch offbeat videos like how the stock market circuit breaker works or educational ones like whether police unions lead to more civilian deaths. [Subscribe here]( Money And Justice — Money and social change. We talk policing, nonprofits, reparations, and the awkwardness of brands getting woke. [Listen here]( The Problem Of The Root — Wild ginseng sells for thousands. We go to a farm hidden in the Appalachian mountains to find out why. [Listen here]( How Other Countries Handled Their Jobs Crises — Not all countries approached the COVID-19 economic crisis the way the U.S. did. The Indicator explores how different strategies on unemployment had radically different outcomes. [Listen here]( Also on The Indicator: [Daymond John: Swimming With Sharks]( [When A Boomtown Goes Bust]( [Who Pays For The Police?]( and [High-Frequency Indicators]( --------------------------------------------------------------- What do you think of today's email? We'd love to hear your thoughts, questions and feedback: [planetmoney@npr.org](mailto:planetmoney@npr.org?subject=Newsletter%20Feedback) Enjoying this newsletter? Forward to a friend! They can [sign up here](. Looking for more great content? [Check out all of our newsletter offerings]( — including Daily News, Politics, Health and more! You received this message because you're subscribed to Planet Money emails. This email was sent by National Public Radio, Inc., 1111 North Capitol Street NE, Washington, DC 20002 [Unsubscribe]( | [Privacy Policy](

Marketing emails from npr.org

View More
Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

24/06/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.