Newsletter Subject

From microplastics to mega-stories: Journalism nonprofit Orb works the global-local angle: The latest from Nieman Lab

From

niemanlab.org

Email Address

newsletter@niemanlab.org

Sent On

Mon, Jan 8, 2018 08:09 PM

Email Preheader Text

?These commons — the air, the water, the soil, our food, our health — these are things w

[Nieman Lab: The Daily Digest] Monday, January 8, 2018 [From microplastics to mega-stories: Journalism nonprofit Orb works the global-local angle]( “These commons — the air, the water, the soil, our food, our health — these are things we share, and they are deeply linked across countries. We need to start seeing them that way.” By Christine Schmidt. [The Offshore Journalism Project would let newsrooms send a “distress signal” when their content is at risk of being lost forever]( “When digital news outlets disappear, the holes in coverage show, and they can be huge.” By Laura Hazard Owen. [Arabic-language narrative podcasts connect with a new generation in a region with a rich oral tradition]( The podcast network Sowt, which both produces and curates podcasts for a Middle East audience, avoids “just translating and adapting U.S. products” to create shows for socially conscious young listeners. By Stefania D'Ignoti. [Here’s who gets news from TV: The elderly, Pew finds (again)]( [What does Mark Zuckerberg’s pledge of fixing Facebook’s issues mean for the fate of news on the platform?]( What We’re Reading Financial Times / Shannon Bond [Podcasts for children boom, but profits are still in their infancy →]( “The question of advertising in children’s podcasts remains unsettled — which may have contributed to the slow entry of many companies into the market, given that this is the dominant business model for podcasting.” Medium / Simon Galperin [How to prepare for the possible removal of publisher posts from Facebook’s news feed →]( “Publisher and user content may be split up in different ways than Facebook had originally experimented. The impact may not be as drastic. But you have nothing to lose if you implement these suggestions and so much to gain.” Poynter [Fact Forward: If you had $50,000, how would you change fact-checking? →]( The International Fact Checking Network will award a $50,000 prize to a project that “can represent a paradigmatic innovation for fact-checkers.” Apply by February 5. Politico / Susan B. Glasser [The weird world of Trump-themed podcasts →]( “At the moment, it feels like the only thing these podcasts are doing is bringing us closer to a media environment where everyone who wants one can find their own personalized Trump podcast, massaging their confirmation bias in the most comforting way possible.” The Ringer / Bryan Curtis [The Kaepernick whisperer →]( “Why do the lefty icons of professional sports turn to Dave Zirin when they want to speak out?” The Guardian / Graham Ruddick and Nicola Slawson [BBC’s China editor resigns in protest over gender pay gap →]( “In a significant escalation of the pay row at the BBC, Carrie Gracie said she was resigning from her position as China editor while accusing the corporation of breaking equality laws and saying she did not trust management to deal with the problem.” Politico / Jason Schwartz [Is Facebook preparing to open up on fake news? →]( “The company has invited representatives from the fact-checking groups with whom it has partnered to its Menlo Park, California, headquarters in early February to discuss, in part, what information could finally be shared.” The New York Times / Kirk Johnson [As low-power local radio rises, tiny voices become a collective shout →]( “It’s an unprecedented time in our radio history when we have so many stations getting on the air at the same time,” said Jennifer Waits, the social media director at Radio Survivor, a group in San Francisco that tracks and advocates for noncommercial radio. Digiday / Lucia Moses [One year in, Facebook Journalism Project gets mixed reviews from publishers →]( Facebook made improvements to Instant Articles, but “Instant Articles’ volume has declined, as Facebook, which is now pinning its future on video, pushes video in the news feed at the expense of text.” A subscription test “required publishers to use Instant Articles, which a lot of big publishers have eschewed, and to set their meter at 10 free articles a month, so there were notable holdouts,” plus it’s “been restricted to Android devices because Apple wouldn’t play ball.” [Nieman Lab]( / [Fuego]( / [Encyclo]( [Twitter]( / [Facebook]( [View email in browser]( [Unsubscribe]( You are receiving this daily newsletter because you signed up for for it at www.niemanlab.org. Nieman Journalism Lab Harvard University 1 Francis Ave.Cambridge, MA 02138 [Add us to your address book](//niemanlab.us1.list-manage.com/vcard?u=dc756b20ebb9521ec3ad95e4a&id=d68264fd5e)

Marketing emails from niemanlab.org

View More
Sent On

28/10/2024

Sent On

25/10/2024

Sent On

24/10/2024

Sent On

23/10/2024

Sent On

21/10/2024

Sent On

17/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.