Newsletter Subject

Rebooting the Minnesota Star Tribune: A conversation with Steve Grove

From

niemanlab.org

Email Address

newsletter@niemanlab.org

Sent On

Mon, Sep 9, 2024 07:18 PM

Email Preheader Text

?We would like to see at least 25% of our P&L look different in a couple of years than it does now

[Nieman Lab: The Daily Digest] Monday, September 9, 2024 [Rebooting the Minnesota Star Tribune: A conversation with Steve Grove]( “We would like to see at least 25% of our P&L look different in a couple of years than it does now…I don’t think any media company right now can just be banking on subscriptions to save the day.” By Richard Tofel. What We’re Reading Washington Post / Eva Dou and Salvador Rizzo [News publishers in the spotlight as another Google monopoly trial begins →]( “While Google is the target of the trial, the proceedings are also expected to shed some light on how businesses such as the New York Times and Wall Street Journal actually make their money these days, and how they depend on arcane marketplaces run by internet giants to do so. [Justice Department attorney Julia Tarver Wood] said prosecutors intend to call executives from companies including USA Today, Journal parent company News Corp. and the Daily Mail to testify in the coming weeks.” Semafor / Ben Smith [OffBall launches as new sports culture brand →]( “The new outlet’s homepage directs users to posts on X and Instagram and to other websites, rather than its own pages — which its founders see as an alternative to ubiquitous, low-quality aggregation.” CNN / Brian Stelter [The Washington Post is giving its homepage a facelift as it seeks a turnaround →]( “Reporters and editors at the news organization have long grumbled about the drab and dated nature of the Post’s digital front door. Among the frustrations: The homepage featured relatively few stories at any given time and lacked a sense of cohesion.” Columbia Journalism Review / Jon Allsop [Is the press “sanewashing” Trump? →]( “It’s worth noting that the sanewashing phenomenon figures into a debate that is almost as old as Trump’s political career itself, and legitimately thorny: whether to expose news consumers more to his rhetoric, or shut it out.” The Guardian / Jack Apollo George [“If journalism is going up in smoke, I might as well get high off the fumes”: Confessions of a chatbot trainer →]( “Before they ever risk leading to a godlike superintelligence or devastating mass unemployment, they first need training. Instead of using these grandiloquent chatbots to automate us out of our livelihoods, tech companies are contracting us to help train their models.” In Depth NH / Bernardo Motta [It’s time to talk about effective funding practices in local news →]( “Prioritize small, independent, public service, nonprofit newsrooms. Those newsrooms have to be accountable in more ways than a for-profit newsroom does, because their mission is usually more aligned with the community they represent. They also have limited access to revenue streams available to for-profits, especially if they want to remain independent.” American Crisis / Margaret Sullivan [The power of a single word about media malfeasance →]( “Trump has become more incoherent as he has aged, but you wouldn’t know it from most of the press coverage, which treats his utterances as essentially logical policy statements — a ‘sweeping vision,’ even.” DW [Russia vows to restrict U.S. media in response to RT row →]( “A symmetrical response is not possible. There is no state news agency in the U.S., and there is no state TV channel in the U.S.,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told the RIA Novosti news agency. “But there will certainly be measures here that will restrict their media disseminating their information.” The Guardian / Zoe Williams [Racism, misogyny, lies: how did X become so full of hatred? →]( “Is it moral to remain on a platform that does so much to bring the politics of division and hatred off the keyboard and into real life? Is X any worse than Facebook, or TikTok, or (for God’s sake!) YouTube? And is it worse on purpose, which is to say, are we watching the unfolding of a Musk master plan?” Semafor / Kadia Goba, Ellie Hall, and David Weigel [A mysterious influencer network has been pushing sexual smears of Kamala Harris →]( “The network that would push the sexual smears began with more run-of-the-mill Republican talking points, but it was unusual in one way, a person who participated in its video calls said: None of the participants identified themselves by name, and all joined calls with their cameras off to preserve their mutual anonymity. However, Semafor was able to identify one of them: former New York Republican Rep. George Santos, who spoke up on one conference call to object when the parties discussed making sexual allegations against Harris.” The Guardian / Lindsey Hilsum [“After Rwanda, I felt I needed philosophical more than psychological help”: Journalist Lindsey Hilsum on war and the consolation of poetry →]( “In my nearly four decades as a foreign correspondent, I have always carried a book of poetry with me. While the images we show have great impact, I feel that journalistic language sometimes fails to convey the intensity of the experience.” The New York Times / James B. Stewart and Brooks Barnes [The palace coup at the Magic Kingdom →]( “The New York Times has pieced together what happened inside Disney during those fateful months by talking to scores of people directly involved. Many of them talked extensively for the first time about what transpired, some only on the condition of anonymity because of their nondisclosure agreements with Disney.” CNBC / Jennifer Elias [Google’s second antitrust trial could help shape the future of online ads →]( “Google is defending itself against claims that its advertising business has acted as a monopoly that’s led to higher ad prices for customers.” [Nieman Lab]( / [Fuego]( [Twitter]( / [Facebook]( [View email in browser]( [Unsubscribe]( You are receiving this daily newsletter because you signed up for for it at www.niemanlab.org. Nieman Journalism Lab Harvard University 1 Francis Ave.Cambridge, MA 02138 [Add us to your address book](

Marketing emails from niemanlab.org

View More
Sent On

28/10/2024

Sent On

25/10/2024

Sent On

24/10/2024

Sent On

23/10/2024

Sent On

21/10/2024

Sent On

17/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.