Newsletter Subject

Did you feel that earthquake?

From

niemanlab.org

Email Address

newsletter@niemanlab.org

Sent On

Fri, Apr 5, 2024 04:04 PM

Email Preheader Text

about the Guardian?s effort to guide people through their uneasy relationship with their phones. ?

[Nieman Lab] The Weekly Wrap: April 05, 2024 Did you feel that earthquake? I felt it here in Cambridge, MA. Sorry but it’s all I’ll be able to talk about for the rest of the day: “Did you feel the earthquake?” If you’d rather think about something else for some reason, maybe try [this story from Sarah Scire]( about the Guardian’s effort to guide people through their uneasy relationship with their phones. “You don’t want to gaslight readers by omission, by not having spaces where you can acknowledge the effect that the news cycle is having on us psychologically and instead just pretending like everything’s great,” Max Benwell, editor and deputy head of audience at Guardian U.S., told Sarah. Anyway, did you feel that earthquake? And are you going to the eclipse? (We will have eclipse coverage, by the way. Stay tuned.) — Laura Hazard Owen From the week [A newsletter about our uneasy relationship to phones becomes The Guardian’s fastest-growing email ever]( “Reclaim Your Brain” acknowledges “the effect that the news cycle is having on us psychologically.” By Sarah Scire. [A new kind of activist journalism: Hunterbrook investigates corporations (and hopes to make bank trading off its reporting)]( “We know this may not be seen as traditional journalism, which is generally known for being dispassionate, reliant on inside sources, and indifferent to profitability.” By Joshua Benton. [The Listening Post Collective offers a free road map (and microgrants) for meeting community information needs]( “I think sometimes we get stuck in an echo chamber of being around each other a little too much. And I think that can hinder some of this work.” By Sophie Culpepper. [Yo! How a content-free social network briefly fascinated the world (and the news media)]( Ten years ago today, a new app arrived to strip the “media” out of social media, reducing messaging to two little letters. It burned bright, but not for long. By Joshua Benton. [A new game parodies The New York Times’ Gaza coverage]( [More people than ever are listening to podcasts]( Highlights from elsewhere Intelligencer / Abby Schreiber [What it’s like to be a member of the royal press pack →]( “The royal press pack is quite a sensitive group of people, and it’s a lot less brutal than the politics beat is.” Nieman Reports / John Daniszewski [“Unparalleled and unprecedented”: Journalists in Gaza have faced the deadliest six months ever recorded →]( “While there was never a time of perfect security, the historic calculus between journalists and combatants has changed in dangerous ways.” Axios / Ryan Heath [Meta to broaden labeling of AI content →]( “Meta admits its current labeling policies are ‘too narrow’ and that a stronger system is needed to deal with today’s wider range of AI-generated content and other manipulated content, such as a January video which appeared to show President Biden inappropriately touching his granddaughter.” ARLnow.com [Virginia to become first state to allow online-only local news sites to publish legal notices →]( “The enactment of HB 264 and SB 157 marks a major milestone in the continued digital transition of the news industry — a painful, decades long process that has resulted in mass layoffs of local journalists and the closure of five local newspapers every two weeks, on average.” Wall Street Journal / Patience Haggin [Brands paid for ads on Forbes.com. Some ran on a copycat site instead. →]( “The alternate site, which Forbes shut down Tuesday following inquiries from The Wall Street Journal, featured stories from Forbes.com that were stretched into formats that can fit many more ads…One [700-word article]( was turned into a 34-slide slideshow, exposing the person who read it on a computer to about 150 ads instead of around seven for someone who read the original piece.” Home With The Armadillo / Andrea Grimes [Substack is setting writers up for a Twitter-style implosion →]( “Follower number go up. Subscriber number go down. Good for Substack. Bad for writers.” [Nieman Lab]( | [View email in browser]( | [Unsubscribe]( You are receiving this daily newsletter because you signed up for for it at www.niemanlab.org. Nieman Journalism Lab · Harvard University · 1 Francis Ave. · Cambridge, MA 02138 · USA

Marketing emails from niemanlab.org

View More
Sent On

24/05/2024

Sent On

23/05/2024

Sent On

22/05/2024

Sent On

21/05/2024

Sent On

20/05/2024

Sent On

17/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.