Why Novels Are a Richer Experience Than Movies

Only novels can plumb the depth of human consciousness. Plus: this week’s top science news; wildfires are changing animal evolution; and more. [View in browser]( | [Join Nautilus]( August 1, 2023   Did a friend forward this? [Register here](. This Tuesday, your FREE member newsletter includes the week’s top science news—plus one full story, below, from The Porthole, our section for short sharp looks at science. Enjoy!   DISCOVERIES The Top Science News This Week   [Reshares on Social Media Amplify Political News But Do Not Detectably Affect Beliefs or Opinions]( Why the reshares feature is a double-edged sword. [Science→](   [Earth’s Evolving Geodynamic Regime Recorded By Titanium Isotopes]( How modern plate tectonics is a break from the past. [Nature→](   [Rapid Growth of Galactic Supermassive Black Holes through Accreting Giant Molecular Clouds during Major Mergers of Their Host Galaxies]( How the most monstrous entities in the cosmos come to be. [The Astrophysical Journal→](   [Wood Decay Fungi Show Enhanced Biodeterioration of Low-Density Polyethylene in the Absence of Wood in Culture Media]( The end of excessive plastic pollution? [PLoS ONE→](   [Fast Protein Folding Is Governed By Memory-Dependent Friction]( A breakthrough in large-scale simulations. [PNAS→](   [The Latest Mega-Breakthrough on Room-Temperature Superconductors Is Probably Nonsense]( Scientists who study superconductivity reviewed the controversial paper. They’re skeptical. [i newspaper→]( Experience the endless possibilities and deep human connections that science offers [JOIN TODAY](   From The Porthole—short sharp looks at science   ARTS Why Novels Are a Richer Experience Than Movies Only novels can plumb the depth of human consciousness. BY ERIK HOEL   Novels solve what philosophers call “the problem of other minds.” It’s the problem that we can never know for sure what a person is thinking, or, from a metaphysical perspective, if they even have a mind at all! We must infer, we must guess, we must speculate. Novels, however, take place in an imaginary world where the problem of other minds does not exist, where mental states, like rage or ennui, can be referred to as directly as one does tables and chairs. There’s an entire academic field that highlights this, like Dorrit Cohn’s Transparent Minds, published in 1978, in which she emphasizes that this is “the singular power possessed by the novelist: creator of beings whose inner lives he can reveal at will.” Or as another scholar put it: “Novel reading is mind reading.” No other medium can mimic this ability. Which actually provides a continued justification of the novel as an artform. Compare novels to the most popular medium of our age: film. Movies necessarily take an extrinsic perspective on the world. This means viewing it as consisting of machinery, mechanisms, formal relationships, extension, bodies, and elements and interactions. The author Tom Wolfe puts it thusly in his essay “My Three Stooges”: When it comes to putting the viewer inside the head of a character … the movies have been stymied. In attempting to create an interior point of view, they have tried everything, from the use of a voice-over that speaks the character’s thoughts, to subtitles that write them out, to the aside, in which the actor turns toward the camera in the midst of a scene and simply says what he’s thinking. … But nothing works; nothing in the motion-picture arts can put you inside the head, the skin, the central nervous system of another human being the way a realistic novel can. Funnily enough, what often makes us think of a movie as artful, rather than mere entertainment, is when filmmakers try their hardest to portray minds in a deep “character-driven” way. Meaning that we judge movies as artful when they attempt to approximate the novel. An ironic fact, since they can never approach the novel’s mastery of this. [Like the story? Join Nautilus today]( My bias here is obvious. I grew up in my mother’s independent bookstore, and came of age among its shelves, and worked there as a teenager hawking fiction to customers, and so feel that the novel is something special, and has been relegated to being an undeservedly less popular artform. I even think it’s arguable that this shift has changed our understanding of our own psychology. Novel reading is mind reading. For instance, Freud was the best thing to ever happen to film and television. Of all the many ideas that Freud advanced, the most popular, even to this day, is the notion of psychological trauma being a central explainer of people’s behavior. This idea permeates our culture, despite research showing that even extremely traumatic events, like living through horrific earthquakes and disasters, leads only to a minority of victims experiencing predictable negative psychological effects like PTSD, and also, that people’s prior personality (to the event) has a [strong effect]( on whether negative outcomes develop. This doesn’t mean trauma isn’t real, but I think it’s possible that trauma’s popularity as an explanation of behavior came about because traumas are extrinsic events—they are things that can be filmed, they can be seen, which in turn means they can literally be shown on-screen as flashbacks. I find it no coincidence that the rise of trauma as an explanation of human behavior just so happens to correspond with the rise of our dominant narrative artform, the extrinsic medium of film, and its replacement of the intrinsic medium of the novel. Film, of course, is an incredible and beautiful medium, but it trends toward characters being mere billiards set to and fro by external events. Only novels can describe the deep whirlpools of human consciousness, which is never fully reducible to response to an external event; it’s a gyre that turns in each of us with its own weather and can render us ciphers to one another, except on the page. From [The World Behind the World: Consciousness, Free Will, and the Limits of Science](. ©2023 Erik Hoel, published July 25, 2023 by Simon & Schuster. Excerpted with permission of the author. Lead cover illustration by Francis Cugat More from The Porthole: • [Wildfires are changing animal evolution]( • [Scientists watch broken metal heal itself](   P.S. The Enlightenment-era biologist Jean-Baptiste Lamarck was born on this day in 1744. He tried to explain, in the century before Darwin, why animals appear remarkably adapted to their environment. Arik Kershenbaum [mentioned]( Lamarck’s best known idea—the two-pronged laws of inheritance—in his book The Zoologist’s Guide to the Galaxy (excerpted in Nautilus): “Animals,” Lamarck thought, “develop traits that they use repeatedly, lose traits they don’t use, and pass on acquired traits to their offspring.”   Today’s newsletter was written by Brian Gallagher   BECOME A MEMBER [At the Intersection of Art and Science]( “The best metaphor I can use for ideas is that they are like jokes which don’t have to be funny.” That’s what Nautilus cover artist James Yang told us about his creative process in a wide-ranging Q&A for our 50th print issue. The award-winning artist and self-proclaimed “science fiction nerd” has a style that’s simple and striking, rendering complex ideas in vivid-colored illustrations that range from poignant to whimsical. “I’ve always been drawn to simpler graphic ideas even as a child because they seemed so smart,” he said. As an acclaimed children’s book author, Yang has certainly held onto his childlike wonder into adulthood. “My wife jokes that she married a giant kid,” he said. “A lot of it is ‘seeing’ the world as you would see it for the first time without the standard preconceptions but with impressions that seem new.” To read more about Yang’s thoughts on the creative process, the rise of AI in art, and what scientists can learn from artists, check out the [full interview here](. As a bonus for our readers, we’re offering a limited number (12) of 50th Edition cover prints signed by James. Visit [the shop here]( to get your print now. [Explore Now]( Thanks for reading. [Tell us](mailto:brian.gallagher@nautil.us) your thoughts on today’s note. Plus, [browse our archive]( of past print issues, and inspire a friend to sign up for [the Nautilus newsletter](. [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Instagram]( Copyright © 2023 NautilusNext, All rights reserved. You were subscribed to the newsletter from nautil.us. Our mailing address is: NautilusNext 360 W 36th Street, 7S, New York, NY 10018 Don't want to hear from us anymore? Click here to [unsubscribe](.