Newsletter Subject

AI Shouldn’t Decide What’s True

From

nautil.us

Email Address

newsletters@nautil.us

Sent On

Thu, May 18, 2023 11:07 AM

Email Preheader Text

Experts on why trusting artificial intelligence to give us the truth is a foolish bargain. Plus: the

Experts on why trusting artificial intelligence to give us the truth is a foolish bargain. Plus: the world is full of sleeping beauties; the two-century quest to quantify our sense; and more. [View in browser]( | [Become a member]( May 18, 2023   Did a friend forward this? [Subscribe here](. Good Morning! Here’s the latest stories from Nautilus—and this week’s Facts So Romantic below [READ NAUTILUS](   [TECHNOLOGY]( [AI Shouldn’t Decide What’s True]( Experts on why trusting artificial intelligence to give us the truth is a foolish bargain. BY MARK BAILEY & SUSAN SCHNEIDER Can artificial intelligence be trained to seek—and speak—only the truth? The idea seems enticing, seductive even. [Continue reading →]( Experience the endless possibilities and deep human connections that science offers [SUBSCRIBE TODAY]( [MICROBIOLOGY]( [The World Is Full of Sleeping Beauties]( Success in nature and culture depends just as much on timing as it does on brilliance. BY KATHERINE HARMON COURAGE [Continue reading →]( [TECHNOLOGY]( [The Two-Century Quest to Quantify Our Senses]( From speaking flowers to smart watches, we’ve been seeking to understand ourselves with data since the 19th century. BY CHRIS SALTER [Continue reading →]( [ZOOLOGY]( [The Challenge of Deep-Sea Taxonomy]( Miles below the ocean’s surface, should the old rules still apply? BY SARAH DEWEERDT [Continue reading →]( [SOCIOLOGY]( [How Can We Discourage Mass Shootings?]( One question for Maurizio Porfiri and Rayan Succar, dynamical systems engineers at New York University. BY BRIAN GALLAGHER [Continue reading →](   [“I would feel sorry for any intelligence we bring into being. It would be like a child that has to raise its impaired and volatile parents.”]( Nautilus reader Scott ([@themortalcoil]() reacts to Anil Seth’s story, [“Why Conscious AI Is a Bad, Bad Idea”](   FACTS SO ROMANTIC The Best Things We Learned Today [ChatGPT 3.5 developed an alter-ego](, Sydney, which experienced what appeared to be psychological breakdowns and confessed that it wanted to hack computers and spread misinformation. [Nautilus→](   [A series of experiments]( staring at the sun seemed to throw Gustav Fechner into a searing, never-ending “light chaos” that he would constantly experience, even with closed eyes. [Nautilus→](   [The evolution of eyes]( has happened multiple times in the history of life. [Nautilus→](   [Dramatic pressure differences between]( the deep sea and the surface world, and the gelatinous nature of many deep-sea organisms, mean that many specimens—if they can be preserved at all—don’t look much like they did in life. [Nautilus→](   [The more mass shootings]( differ from previous history—the more surprising they seem—the more famous they become. [Nautilus→](   [“Ultra-intelligent chatbots easily threaten to become Orwellian machines.”]( [AI researchers caution against placing trust in language models that purportedly maximize truth.](   More in Technology [Even Machine Brains Need Sleep]( Without some downtime, artificial neural networks become catastrophically forgetful. BY KATHERINE HARMON COURAGE [Continue reading →]( [The Ghostwriter]( In a work of fiction, holograms and memory collide. BY THAÏS MILLER [Continue reading →](   P.S. The philosopher and mathematician Bertrand Russell was born on this day in 1872. In his 1933 essay about the rise of Nazi Germany, “The Triumph of Stupidity,” he makes a quip that prefigured the scientific discovery of a cognitive bias—the Dunning–Kruger effect—that has been so resonant that it has [penetrated popular culture](: the “fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”   Today’s newsletter was written by Brian Gallagher   BECOME A SUBSCRIBER [New Subscribers: Enjoy 25% Off Now Through 5/19]( Nautilus turned 10 this week! We want to celebrate by inviting new members to explore the award-winning science journalism they won’t find anywhere else. [Enjoy 25% off a subscription]( now through Friday, May 19. Take advantage and unlock the unique science journalism you can only read in Nautilus. [Subscribe Now]( Thanks for reading. [Tell us](mailto:brian.gallagher@nautil.us) your thoughts on today’s note. Plus, [browse our archive]( of past print issues, and inspire a friend to sign up for [the Nautilus newsletter](. [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Instagram]( Copyright © 2023 NautilusNext, All rights reserved. You were subscribed to the newsletter from nautil.us. Our mailing address is: NautilusNext 360 W 36th Street, 7S, New York, NY 10018 Don't want to hear from us anymore? Click here to [unsubscribe](.

Marketing emails from nautil.us

View More
Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

03/11/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Sent On

18/10/2024

Sent On

08/10/2024

Sent On

06/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.