Newsletter Subject

Day 5 of Jan. 6 hearings: Trump tried to corrupt DOJ — and failed

From

msnbc.com

Email Address

email@mail.msnbc.com

Sent On

Fri, Jun 24, 2022 12:31 AM

Email Preheader Text

The witnesses vividly described meetings with Trump and his various strategies to use the Justice De

The witnesses vividly described meetings with Trump and his various strategies to use the Justice Department for his own political gain. [View in browser]( [Image]( June 23, 2022 JAN. 6 HEARINGS RECAP: DAY 5 [Alternate text] The House committee investigating the [Jan. 6 insurrection held its fifth public hearing](Thursday afternoon, this time homing in on [former President Donald Trump]('s relentless but unsuccessful attempts[to pressure the Justice Department to collaborate]( with his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. The hearing centered primarily on live testimony [from three former Justice Department officials](who bucked Trump's attempts to discredit the electron using the power of their agency: Jeffrey Rosen, the acting attorney general; [Richard Donoghue](, the acting deputy attorney general; and [Steven Engel](, who led the department's Office of Legal Counsel. The witnesses vividly described meetings with Trump and his various strategies to use the Justice Department for his own political gain, including angling to install lawyer Jeffrey Clark as acting attorney general. Unlike his fellow Justice Department officials, Clark, then the acting head of the civil division, was willing to side with Trump's disinformation campaign about election fraud. [Trump declined to promote Clark]( only after Donoghue threatened that there would be mass resignations from department officials in response. The officials also described having to constantly bat down unsubstantiated election fraud claims and outrageous conspiracy theories — [Donoghue was once forced to watch a kooky YouTube video of a conspiracy theory]( that a State Department official in Italy, alongside British intelligence and the CIA, was conspiring to manipulate U.S. votes. [Donoghue]( deemed the theory "pure insanity" in an email to Rosen. Justice Department leaders also had to [remind Trump of the "very limited" purview]( of the Justice Department when it comes to intervening in elections, which is mainly about civil rights responsibilities and criminal conduct in federal elections. The Justice Department doesn't exercise collective quality control or investigate minor, inconsequential irregularities in elections. But of course, Trump's goal wasn't to investigate systematic election fraud — a nonexistent phenomenon that he nonetheless amplified with gusto — but to exploit the gravitas of the department to discredit the election. His intentions couldn't have gotten any clearer than in this damning quote — perhaps the most iconic line of the hearing: "Just say the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican congressmen," Trump told top Justice Department officials, according to Donoghue's contemporaneous notes of a meeting on Dec. 27, 2020. The committee [also revealed evidence]( of people seeking pardons from Trump in the final days of his presidency, including Republican Reps. Matt Gaetz of Florida, Louie Gohmert of Texas, Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, Andy Biggs of Arizona and Mo Brooks of Alabama. Brooks requested a pardon for all lawmakers who voted against certifying electors — including himself. As MSNBC columnist Jessica Levinson [wrote]( in a blog post Thursday: "Perhaps, some lawmakers feared politically motivated criminal charges by Biden's future DOJ. Perhaps. But another explanation, arguably the much more straightforward explanation, is that these members of Congress knew or feared they broke the law." — Zeeshan Aleem Read MSNBC's live coverage of the hearing [here](. HEARING HIGHLIGHTS [Alternate text] [A photo of Matt Gaetz]( [Jessica Levinson]( [The Republican lawmakers who asked to be pardoned by Trump]( [A photo of Trump]( [Jessica Levinson]( ['Just say it was corrupt': Trump implored DOJ members to lie about 2020 election, witness said]( [A photo of Jeffrey Clark]( [Lisa Rubin]( [Why the White House counsel referred to Jeffrey Clark's draft letter as a 'murder-suicide pact']( [A photo of the Jan. 6 committee]( [Frank Figliuzzi]( [It's a good sign the committee is postponing hearings]( [A photo of Trump and Mark Meadows]( [Zeeshan Aleem]( [Italy conspiracy theory pushed by Team Trump was 'pure insanity']( MORE FROM MSNBC [Alternate text]   "Love & The Constitution," an MSNBC Films feature documentary, follows Jan. 6 select committee member Rep. Jamie Raskin and his fight to defend American democracy during the final days of the Trump presidency, while coping with the tragic loss of his son, who passed away days before the attack on the Capitol. "Love & The Constitution" is streaming now on Peacock.   [Privacy]( [Unsubscribe](listvar=sub_daily)

Marketing emails from msnbc.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

03/11/2024

Sent On

02/11/2024

Sent On

27/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.