Newsletter Subject

CrowdTangle is dead. But the movement of people fighting for data-access is only just getting started.

From

mozillafoundation.org

Email Address

mozilla@eml.mozilla.org

Sent On

Wed, Aug 21, 2024 06:47 PM

Email Preheader Text

Together, we can preserve the legacy of CrowdTangle. ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??

Together, we can preserve the legacy of CrowdTangle.  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ [Mozilla ]( [❤️ Mozilla ❤️]( [Donate]( Hello, RIP CrowdTangle. Last week, Meta killed its industry-leading transparency tool, CrowdTangle.1 This is a dangerous decision made by Meta’s executives – and it’s a decision that disregards our collective ability to monitor hate speech and disinformation on Facebook and Instagram. But fortunately, there is a silver lining. CrowdTangle is ending, but the movement of researchers, journalists, and watchdogs fighting for robust data transparency from the world’s largest tech companies is stronger than ever – and we’re only just getting started. Over the past months, the power of our campaign to preserve CrowdTangle’s approach has caught the attention of lawmakers and regulators in both the EU and the US.2,3 We’ve shifted the conversation away from being about piecemeal software changes that Meta voluntarily gives us – and instead, we’re now working with researchers, lawmakers and regulators to dictate the types of data access we collectively need from Meta (and all other major platforms, too). Together, we can preserve the legacy of CrowdTangle. We must continue the fight to ensure that journalists, researchers and watchdogs continue to have effective ways to track hate speech and disinformation on Meta’s platforms – and we won’t stop until robust data access for public interest research is a reality. [Will you become a monthly donor to Mozilla? Partnering with lawmakers and regulators to take on Meta and preserve CrowdTangle’s legacy will require a long-term advocacy effort – and monthly, sustaining donors are what makes that possible.]( [Become a monthly donor to Mozilla →]( Since Facebook purchased CrowdTangle in 2016, this tool has been lauded as a leader in data access and transparency. It’s allowed tens of thousands of users to identify hate speech, election interference and hate speech in real time. But in recent years, Meta’s executives have questioned the worth of a tool that gives the public access to information that can be used to (fairly) criticise the company.4 Following Meta’s announcement that they’d kill CrowdTangle on 14 August 2024 – right in the middle of the biggest election year on record – the Mozilla community has led a widespread global campaign, including: - 180 organisations, researchers, and journalists signed our open letter calling on Meta to protect the integrity of upcoming elections by maintaining CrowdTangle research, consult with the global CrowdTangle community, and onboard users immediately to their replacement tool.5 - Almost 66,000 of us signed the petition calling on Meta to rethink their decision.6 - Media outlets picked up this story, with headline after headline sharing our collective concerns to a global audience.7 Meanwhile, the European Commission hit Meta with a formal investigation, explicitly naming the company’s decision to ditch CrowdTangle and cut off access to real-time data used to monitor political disinformation during elections. And in the US, members of Congress sent a bipartisan letter to Meta asking the company tough questions we have also been asking. Following months of sustained pressure, Meta has made several changes to the new Content Library and has made an effort to consult with CrowdTangle users.8 These changes are a step in the right direction but are not yet enough to transform the Content Library into an adequate replacement. This is the moment we lose CrowdTangle forever – but our fight does not end here. We will not let up until Meta and all social media companies are required to provide robust transparency into their platforms. And with a raft of new transparency and accountability rules being debated and implemented all across the world, now is the perfect moment. It’s up to us to reclaim the internet. And we can only be successful if we’re all in it together for the long run. [Will you consider signing up to become a monthly donor to Mozilla? Your donation will be used to push back against a world built by big tech, for big tech – and to reclaim the internet.]( [Become a monthly donor to Mozilla →]( Thank you for all that you do for the internet. Claire PershanEU Advocacy Lead Mozilla --------------------------------------------------------------- More Information: 1. AP News: [Meta kills off misinformation tracking tool CrowdTangle despite pleas from researchers, journalists](. 15 August 2024. 2. European Commission: [Commission opens formal proceedings against Facebook and Instagram under the Digital Services Act](. 30 April 2024. 3. Axios: [Lawmakers ask Meta to delay shutting down CrowdTangle](. 24 July 2024. 4. New York Times: [A Former Facebook Executive Pushes to Open Social Media’s ‘Black Boxes’](. 2 January 2022. 5. Mozilla Foundation: [Open Letter To Meta](. 14 March 2024. 6. Mozilla Foundation: [TELL META: Don't Kill Your Crucial Transparency Tool, CrowdTangle!]( April 2024. 7. Some examples of the press coverage: a. Fast Company: [Former CrowdTangle CEO has questions about Meta’s decision to close the research tool during an election year](. 23 March 2024. b. Wired: [Meta Kills a Crucial Transparency Tool at the Worst Possible Time](. 25 March 2024. 8. Mozilla Foundation: [Don’t be Fooled by Meta’s Transparency Display: Election Integrity Risks Remain](. 4 June 2024. Connect with us [X]( [YouTube]( [Instagram]( Thanks for reading! You’re receiving this email because you subscribed to Mozilla News. If you no longer want to receive our emails, we’ll understand if you [unsubscribe](. You can also [update your email preferences]( at any time. [❤️ Mozilla ❤️]( [Donate]( 149 New Montgomery St, 4th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105 USA [Legal]( • [Privacy]( [Unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from mozillafoundation.org

View More
Sent On

01/12/2024

Sent On

07/10/2024

Sent On

04/10/2024

Sent On

27/09/2024

Sent On

16/09/2024

Sent On

09/09/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.