Newsletter Subject

We’re asking OpenAI: Did you scrape our data to build ChatGPT?

From

mozillafoundation.org

Email Address

mozilla@eml.mozilla.org

Sent On

Fri, May 31, 2024 06:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

Taking on powerful tech companies is not easy – but it is possible, as long as we are in it tog

Taking on powerful tech companies is not easy – but it is possible, as long as we are in it together.  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ [Mozilla]( [❤️ Mozilla ❤️]( [Donate]( OpenAI went on a press tour to tout its new version of ChatGPT, but still won’t talk about one key missing feature: transparency. OpenAI has resisted calls from our community – and is even fighting a major court case brought by the New York Times – asking them to explain its use of personal data and copyrighted content in its AI models. That’s why Mozilla is demanding transparency from OpenAI about the data they’re using to train their AI tools. Every donation to Mozilla helps keep up on the pressure on powerful tech companies like OpenAI. That’s important, because the only way we’ll be able to hold them accountable and establish trustworthy AI is if we are in this together. [Make a]([$25 contribution to Mozilla today to sustain the campaign work required to take on Big Tech and ensure AI is trustworthy.]( [Donate $25 →]( Hello, Now that the latest version of ChatGPT is out, OpenAI has received a lot of publicity touting all the new features. There’s just one important feature still missing: transparency. We still don’t know how OpenAI trains its AI models, and what data it uses to do so. To be clear, we don't have basic information about how the data is collected or filtered in their AI tools. OpenAI has dodged questions from Mozilla and others – but we are not giving up because all of us deserve to know how this new technology was built. And if OpenAI refuses to provide answers, it makes us more convinced that they may be hiding something. OpenAI isn’t the only company that needs to be more transparent about its AI tools – Mozilla is also calling on Microsoft and Google to do the same. But right now, OpenAI is a high-profile leader of this new era of technology, and what they do has a large impact on AI advancements as a whole. Demanding transparency from powerful and irresponsible tech companies about their AI models is not going to be easy – it will require a huge effort in order to keep up the pressure. And right now, it is up to the Mozilla community to use our collective power to ensure the next wave of AI is for the public good. Mozilla's campaign work is made possible by tens of thousands of grassroots donors who have contributed to reclaim the internet. Today we are hoping you'll join them by adding your donation today. [Contribute $25 to Mozilla today so that together we can demand transparency from powerful and irresponsible tech companies and ensure AI is trustworthy.]( [Donate $25 →]( OpenAI has seen lots of controversy over the last few months, with its board trying to oust CEO Sam Altman over a “breakdown in trust” and the recent departures of leading staff involved in AI safety efforts. But the controversy doesn’t seem to have changed OpenAI’s attitude to how it develops AI. As CEO Sam Altman said earlier this month, “I think that you can just do stuff in the world… You don’t need to wait, you don’t need to get permission.” Take the recent example of actress Scarlett Johansson. When OpenAI released ChatGPT with a voice that closely resembled her own, Johansson's lawyers sent inquiries requesting them to detail the exact process by whichOpenAI had created the voice. After not providing any detail on how the voice was developed, OpenAI quickly removed it from the latest ChatGPT version. How can we confront the problems that generative AI is causing? It starts with knowing how companies train their AI models, and what data they use. We currently have a limited grasp of how different companies' technologies work and why AI models behave in certain ways – which is why it’s past time for better transparency. The Mozilla community is taking on some of the most powerful tech companies in the world, and it’s important that all of us stay involved. Mozilla is conducting research on AI, running campaigns, and commissioning independent research projects to scrutinize AI models and document issues with AI, such as amplifying racist content. Because the real-world impact of these AI tools is too great for them to remain largely opaque. So if you agree it's time for OpenAI to be held accountable for how they build AI models, we hope you'll consider making a contribution today. [Contribute $25 to support Mozilla's campaign efforts to take on powerful and irresponsible tech companies, demand transparency on AI models, and make AI more trustworthy.]( Thank you for all you do for the internet. Michael WhitneyDirector, Digital Engagement Mozilla [Donate $25 →]( Connect with us [X]( [YouTube]( [Instagram]( Thanks for reading! You’re receiving this email because you subscribed to Mozilla News. If you no longer want to receive our emails, we’ll understand if you [unsubscribe](. You can also [update your email preferences]( at any time. [❤️ Mozilla ❤️]( [Donate]( 149 New Montgomery St, 4th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105 USA [Legal]( • [Privacy]( [Unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from mozillafoundation.org

View More
Sent On

01/12/2024

Sent On

07/10/2024

Sent On

04/10/2024

Sent On

27/09/2024

Sent On

16/09/2024

Sent On

09/09/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.