Newsletter Subject

Hamilton v Verstappen no-call verdict confirmed

From

motorsport.com

Email Address

news@e.motorsport.com

Sent On

Fri, Nov 19, 2021 06:13 PM

Email Preheader Text

But what happens next time? ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

But what happens next time? ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ [motorsport.com]( Who’d be a referee? They are only the centre of attention in sport when a clash occurs, and whichever decision they reach, one set of fans is going to be outraged. In the case of Lewis Hamilton/Mercedes vs Max Verstappen/Red Bull in Brazil, the referee (the race stewards) noted their on-track clash but then decided against investigating. Mercedes then presented the onboard footage of Verstappen’s (lack of) steering angle towards the apex of Turn 4, but this didn’t meet the stewards’ criteria for review as it showed “nothing exceptional”. If you’d like a soccer metaphor, it was like referee Mike Dean waving ‘play on’ when a Liverpool player had clattered a Manchester Utd rival during a key play, but they went on to score a goal anyways. But then, when United claimed there was a need to sanction the Liverpool player for the foul, the ref waved them away. After the game, Man Utd presents extra video footage as evidence – again, this is dismissed by the Premier League, even though the referee hadn’t gone to the VAR screen in mid-game. Whether you feel the Hamilton/Verstappen decision is right or wrong probably depends on which driver/team you favour. The real consequence here is the drivers are now getting mixed messages about the current rules of combat. I’m all for allowing games to flow, it makes for a better spectacle, but that approach has a nasty habit of causing further flare-ups in future. PS: Speaking as a Liverpool fan, when have Mike Dean decisions ever been consistent?! By: Charles Bradley, Global Editor in Chief Motorsport.com EDITOR'S CHOICE Why Mercedes' right of review into Verstappen's Brazil F1 driving was denied The Sao Paulo Grand Prix Formula 1 stewards denied Mercedes a right of review into Max Verstappen’s driving because they did not feel the new footage was sufficiently significant. [READ MORE]( Full FIA stewards' statement on Mercedes' review request The FIA rejected Mercedes's right to review Max Verstappen's driving at Formula 1's Brazilian Grand Prix. Below is the full statement from the stewards. [Read More]( Horner: Red Bull ready to protest Mercedes F1 rear wing Red Bull Formula 1 team boss Christian Horner says his team will lodge a protest over the final races of the season if it sees Mercedes use its Brazil rear wing. [Read More]( F1 Grand Prix practice results: Bottas fastest in Qatar Valtteri Bottas was fastest for Mercedes on the opening day of Qatar Grand Prix practice at Losail International Circuit on Friday, the 20th round of the 2021 Formula 1 World Championship. [Read More]( McLaren: F1 drivers need answers from Masi about what is acceptable now McLaren believes that the behavior of drivers will change if Formula 1 race director Michael Masi decides that Max Verstappen’s behavior in the Brazilian Grand Prix was acceptable. [Read More]( MOTORSPORT JOBS Job of the Week: Prometheus Fuels | Mechanical Engineer [Learn More]( [Button Text]( [Custom]( [Custom]( [Custom]( Copyright © 2021 Motorsport.com, All rights reserved. This email was sent to {EMAIL} by Motorsport.com. Our Mailing Address is: Motorsport.com 5972 N.E. 4th Avenue Miami, FL 33137 Don't want to receive emails? [Unsubscribe](. Part of [Motorsport Network]( ‌

Marketing emails from motorsport.com

View More
Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

31/10/2024

Sent On

20/10/2024

Sent On

19/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.