Newsletter Subject

How the Christian right hijacked IVF

From

motherjones.com

Email Address

newsletters@motherjones.com

Sent On

Wed, Feb 28, 2024 07:46 PM

Email Preheader Text

The MoJo Daily newsletter, Monday through Friday. ? ? February 28, 2024 I was one of the lucky o

The MoJo Daily newsletter, Monday through Friday. [View in browser]( [Mother Jones Daily Newsletter](     February 28, 2024 I was one of the lucky ones: For my husband and me, IVF worked on the first embryo transfer. My son—a miracle, as all babies are—was born in 2016. After the first year and a half of motherhood, a happy blur of marveling at the incredible little person that science had helped us bring into the world, my husband and I were ready to try for our second. We eagerly went back to the clinic to transfer one of our three frozen embryos. The doctor assured us that this one looked great—just as high-quality as the one that became our son. I was elated when the clinic called to tell me that the transfer had been successful. The pregnancy test was positive, and my hormone levels were rising at the proper rate. I couldn’t believe my luck: From a single egg retrieval, my son had been born, and now it looked like that same batch would produce my second and final child. But at my first ultrasound, when I was supposed to be seven weeks pregnant, the reproductive endocrinologist frowned as she studied the screen. She was sorry, she told me, but there was no heartbeat. I was gutted, but determined. So we tried again. And then we tried again after that. None of the remaining embryos took. Those miscarriages were grueling, but for IVF patients, this heartbreak is not unusual. That’s because many embryos aren’t viable, so trial and error is inherent in the process. The creation of extra frozen embryos isn’t just a nice bonus—it’s an essential part of the process. That’s why last week’s [decision]( by an Alabama court—which prohibits IVF clinics from creating extra embryos—isn’t just an inconvenience, it’s a direct attack on the entire concept of IVF. But it didn’t happen by accident. To many, the basic premise underlying the Alabama decision seemed contradictory: Don’t anti-abortion activists want people to have more babies? In theory, yes—yet paradoxically, the ruling was the result of a decades-long crusade against fertility treatments mounted by the same people who oppose access to abortion, as I [write]( in a story published today. Because of course abortion and IVF are two sides of the same coin: Both allow people like me some semblance of control over the momentous decision of how and when to expand our families. There was a happy ending to our story eventually—just shy of three years after my son was born, through a slightly more complicated IVF process, we had our daughter. I remain deeply grateful to the clinics, doctors, and nurses who helped us. My heart aches for the Alabama IVF patients who won’t have the same opportunity we did to have the family that we had always wanted. —Kiera Butler Advertisement [House Bookshop Ad]( [Top Story] [Top Story]( [How the Christian Right Became So Hostile to IVF]( Their work—decades in the making—has reached a new inflection point. BY KIERA BUTLER SPONSORED CONTENT BY THE NATION TRAVELS   [Contemporary and Imperial Morocco]( Oct 14 – 25, 2024 Explore the energy and beauty of Fez, Marrakech, Rabat, and Casablanca, and the peaceful expanse of the Agafay desert as we journey through this alluring land. A true mosaic fusing Arab, Jewish, Amazigh, Andalusian, and other European influences, we’ll explore the sights, sounds and scents of this unique constellation of cultures. [Trending] [Florida man facing 91 criminal counts wins Michigan primary]( BY JEREMY SCHULMAN   [Ohio GOP candidate JR Majewski used a slur, considered dropping out (again), but will stay in the race]( BY JULIA MÉTRAUX   [Should Israel be held accountable for "ecocide"?]( BY LYLLA YOUNES   [What happens if we actually treat fetuses like people?]( BY KATIE HERCHENROEDER Advertisement [House Donations Ad]( [Special Feature] [Special Feature]( [Forced parenthood and failing safety nets: This is life in post-Roe America]( The states with the strictest abortion laws are doing the least to help poor families. What could possibly go wrong? BY ABBY VESOULIS [Fiercely Independent] Support from readers allows Mother Jones to do journalism that doesn't just follow the pack. [Donate]( Did you enjoy this newsletter? Help us out by [forwarding]( it to a friend or sharing it on [Facebook]( and [Twitter](. [Mother Jones]( [Donate]( [Donate Monthly]( [Subscribe]( This message was sent to {EMAIL}. To change the messages you receive from us, you can [edit your email preferences]( or [unsubscribe from all mailings.]( For advertising opportunities see our online [media kit.]( Were you forwarded this email? [Sign up for Mother Jones' newsletters today.]( [www.MotherJones.com]( PO Box 8539, Big Sandy, TX 75755

Marketing emails from motherjones.com

View More
Sent On

24/05/2024

Sent On

23/05/2024

Sent On

23/05/2024

Sent On

22/05/2024

Sent On

21/05/2024

Sent On

21/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.