Newsletter Subject

Flagging this for you—and some recent wins.

From

motherjones.com

Email Address

newsletters@motherjones.com

Sent On

Mon, May 15, 2023 11:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

A sweeping project on climate. ? MoJo Reader, This is not a fundraising email. We are not asking y

A sweeping project on climate.   [Mother Jones]( MoJo Reader, This is not a fundraising email. We are not asking you to support Mother Jones today. We do that often, and it’s important, but we also want to start doing more to keep you posted on what’s going on behind the scenes. A lot of you have told us you appreciate our emails about how media works and doesn't work, and when we flag our in-depth reporting projects that can be easily drowned out by all the noise in the news. And let's be real: Building trust and a direct connection with readers is essential for newsrooms to weather the [brutal economics]( of our industry. So think of this as a monthly'ish member update, to share what we're excited about or think is worth your attention when you a moment to spare. As always, we'd love to hear what you think and how we can better serve you: [Our inbox is open]( 24/7. Let's dive in! A SPECIAL ISSUE ON CLIMATE We don't often dedicate an entire issue of our print magazine (and almost a year of work for our newsroom) to a specific reporting project, but climate transformation is not just any other story. So across seven pieces in our May+June magazine, we dug deep into decarbonization and what it will actually take to make the colossal shift from a fossil fuel economy to one based on renewable energy—and the [special online package]( includes even more great reporting from our [Climate Desk]( partners around the world. The cover story is from peerless writer Bill McKibben, who first called attention to the climate crisis in the 1980s. In "[Yes in Our Backyards](," he shares how he learned to love development projects—for the green economy. Change isn't easy for anyone, and is full of nuance, so he provides a four-point framework that has helped him figure out when to say YES to certain projects—even if our first reaction might be NO. It's a powerful, paradigm-shifting, [must-read]( essay that is really having an impact out there. "An incredible piece and legitimately groundbreaking shift for the climate left, one desperately needed…" [tweeted]( Elan Sykes, an energy policy analyst with the Public Policy Institute, when the article went up online. Senator Bryan Schatz, of Hawaii, [said simply](, “Damn, this is so good.” And looking at the rest of the decarbonization package, a reader in New Orleans [thanked us]( for "a much-needed, holistic update of how we should fight the climate crisis." So here are the other main features that were part of this sweeping climate transformation project: - "[Think Globally, Build Like Hell Locally](" - "[The Green Movement's Best Weapon Has Become a Problem](" - "[What if Walmart Turned Its Parking Lots Into Solar Farms?](" - "[The Little City That Could](" - "[What 'Electrifying Everything' Actually Looks Like](" - "[Snapshots From a Clean Energy Future](" - "[Big Utilities Are 'Diabolical, Man!'](" We hope you'll make time to [dig into]( this great package sometime soon. And we'll add: It is only because we answer to readers who want, and support, in-depth journalism that we're able to dedicate an entire issue of our magazine, and [even more]( online firepower, to advancing the national conversation about what it actually takes to decarbonize, and what stands in the way of the transformation to a greener future. Like editor-in-chief Clara Jeffery [writes]( introducing the package, "Challenging assumptions is part of Mother Jones’ role, and I believe that we’re uniquely positioned to speak truth to friends, as well as to power." MONITORING MEDIA The last couple weeks have been tough for journalism. Buzzfeed's [news division]( stopped publishing, and there were [reports]( that Vice Media appears headed for bankruptcy—after being valued at $5.7 billion just six years ago. That was shortly after Mother Jones published "[Pop Goes the Digital Media Bubble](," warning that the froth about online advertising as the answer to journalism’s woes was about to fizzle. A lot of great journalists got paid and a lot of great journalism was made as part of that bubble, and that’s good. But the fantasy of viral news also delayed the inevitable reckoning with the fact that quality news is a public good like schools, museums, and libraries—and the market can't solve for that. Monika has a bit [more on this on Twitter](, and the takeaway is this: People, institutions, and investors who care about an informed public can turn this around. But we need to stop chasing after shiny objects or waiting for someone to invent the next thing. We need to invest in the solid ideas already here. Which is what so many of you reading this are doing. We're so damn grateful to have a 47-year track record of being supported by our community of readers, whether by donations, helping us reach new folks, or your steadfast readership. Thank you. We'll save our thoughts on Twitter and Tucker for another day. THE GOOD NEWS Let's finish with some good news! We have plenty of that, because our team has been racking up some serious hardware when it comes to awards. It’s wonderful to be recognized for our work, being a scrappy nonprofit that punches above our weight (and budget) and competes with the biggest national outlets. And there are [even more awards]( of late than can realistically fit here: - Just this week, Ruth Murai won the Asian American Journalists Association award for feature writing, for her personal, riveting piece, "[My Family Lost Our Farm During Japanese Incarceration. I Went Searching for What Remains](." - Kathryn Joyce, Nathan Rosenberg, and Bryce Stucki were honored by the National Association of Black Journalists for their deeply-reported and immensely-eye-opening feature, "[The 'Machine That Eats Up Black Farmland'](." - The Oscar for our industry is the American Society of Magazine Editors annual awards, and MoJo’s Samantha Michaels and Mark Helenowski took home top honors last month in the video category for a powerful, heart-wrenching documentary as part of our deep dive into so-called "failure to protect" laws. [Watch it here]( and [hear from Sam]( about how this project came to life. - Samantha's big investigation was also recognized with the John Bartlow Martin Award from Northwestern’ Medill School of Journalism, which goes to just one magazine article in the nation each year. - The team of Noah Lanard, Stephanie Mencimer, Tim Murphy, and Ari Berman took home silver from the Anthem Awards (from the Webby's, for mission-driven work) for their collective reporting on the Big Lie and election-deniers. Here's [Noah's](, [Stephanie's](, [Ari's](, and [two]( [stories]( from Tim that were honored. (The winner of gold in this category? None other than Samantha Michaels!) - MoJo and our friends at the Center for Investigative Reporting took home top honors from the Overseas Press Club for our feature "[The Bitter Work Behind Sugar](." - And photo editor Mark Murrmann won both gold and silver awards from the Society of Publication Designers for curating two of the amazing photo essays that are a big part of MoJo’s visual journalism: "[See Myanmar’s Crisis Through the Eyes of the Photographers Risking Their Lives to Bear Witness](," and "[It’s Not the Other America. It’s Just America.](" Kudos to all the editors, fact-checkers, and business professionals who helped bring these award-winning stories to life—and to our entire community of readers for valuing and helping us do journalism that matters. It truly is a team effort. You have our permission to claim these awards as part of the MoJo community. YOUR WINS? And speaking of the Mother Jones community, perhaps YOU have a win to share about people power making change on an issue we write about from your community or from your advocacy? Maybe a personal story about how Mother Jones has changed the way to see something, or inspired you to do something different? [Let us know and fill out the form here]( as we experiment with ways to better connect with you around our journalism and how we're fighting for change together. We’d love to spotlight some of your stories in updates like this in the future (only with your permission, of course). That's it for today. We're grateful for the time and hope this helps you follow our big stories and know how vital you are to everything we do. And we look forward to continuing the conversation with you, so please [let us know what you think and how we can best serve you](. Thanks for reading, and for everything you do to show up democracy, justice, the truth, and one another. Onward, Monika Bauerlein CEO Brian Hiatt Online Membership Director [Donate](   [Mother Jones]( [Donate]( [Donate Monthly]( [Subscribe]( This message was sent to {EMAIL}. To change the messages you receive from us, you can [edit your email preferences]( or [unsubscribe from all mailings.]( For advertising opportunities see our online [media kit.]( Were you forwarded this email? [Sign up for Mother Jones' newsletters today.]( [www.MotherJones.com]( PO Box 8539, Big Sandy, TX 75755

Marketing emails from motherjones.com

View More
Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

28/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.