Newsletter Subject

The worst kind of NIMBY—and why they have me very worried these days

From

motherjones.com

Email Address

newsletters@motherjones.com

Sent On

Tue, Apr 18, 2023 07:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

The MoJo Daily newsletter, Monday through Friday. ? ? April 18, 2023 Hi, I'm Clara Jeffery, edit

The MoJo Daily newsletter, Monday through Friday. [View in browser]( [Mother Jones Daily Newsletter](     April 18, 2023 Hi, I'm Clara Jeffery, editor-in-chief here at Mother Jones. I want to tell you about "[Save Lafayette,](" which, last month, finally lost a long-running battle to stop a 315-unit housing complex from being built in Lafayette, a small affluent city near Oakland, California. From a climate perspective, the spot was ideal: on a former quarry, next to a high school, close to mass transit. [Sixty-three units—20 percent—were set aside for low-income households](. But the group of “[Lafayette residents who support our City’s historic character](” objected to “excessive urbanization that overcrowds our schools, causes massive traffic congestion, worsens parking problems, and threatens our health and safety.” This was a classic NIMBY ("Not in My Backyard") battle: a rich community spurning the less affluent—never mind that those people staff their schools and restaurants. Never mind, too, that hampering urban density causes people to sprawl into the wildlife-urban interface, which is a major cause of forest fires, and parts of Lafayette are in what Cal Fire deems a “[Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone](.” And if you’re surprised to learn that [Lafayette residents overwhelmingly voted for Biden](, don’t be. NIMBYs come in a variety of forms, but the most confounding are those who call themselves progressive yet abuse laws conceived to protect the environment, or foster good government, to block desperately needed housing, driving up costs and fueling homelessness. Some on the left continue to be quite acrobatic in their defense of blocking housing, ignoring all evidence that this mostly benefits rich homeowners. So why am I banging on about housing [in a package devoted to the green energy transformation](? Because watching how the housing wars have played out in California makes me very worried about whether we can achieve that transformation. Doing so requires building tons of denser, transit-linked housing, but also massive wind and solar farms, enough transmission lines to circle the Earth three times, lithium mines, and scads of factories, and that’s just for starters. As Bill McKibben notes in our cover story, “[Yes in Our Backyards](”: “California used to be the world’s ideal—the Golden State. Now it’s increasingly a cautionary tale, of the wildfires that break out when you don’t control the temperature, of ‘bomb cyclones’ that dump a year’s worth of [rainfall]( in a month, and of the homeless camps that inevitably arise when the only houses still available are too expensive for most people to afford.” Today, we must consider not just personal interests, but global impacts. Failure to decarbonize will not be borne equally, but it will be felt everywhere. The housing crisis and the green energy transformation intersect on a variety of planes. Taking on these enormous tasks in earnest will require progressives to shed some old habits and challenge some dearly held assumptions. Challenging assumptions is part of Mother Jones’ role, and I believe that we’re uniquely positioned to speak truth to friends, as well as to power. —Clara Jeffery Advertisement [Project Good Work]( [Top Story] [Top Story]( [Yes in Our Backyards]( It’s time progressives like me learned to love the green building boom. BY BILL MCKIBBEN SPONSORED CONTENT BY UNDERSCORE   Indigenous-centered nonprofit news in the Pacific Northwest UNDERSCORE NEWS, based in Portland, Oregon, is committed to in-depth coverage of news impacting Indigenous communities and people across the Pacific Northwest who have historically been underrepresented — and often misrepresented — in media. Underscore aims to produce impactful stories that might otherwise go unreported and unheard. As a nonprofit, Underscore is funded by grants and donations from organizations and individuals who believe in the importance of independent Indigenous-centered journalism. Subscribe to their[free newsletter here](. [Trending] [Donald Trump's lawyers just made a big mistake]( BY DAVID CORN   [A Black teen rang the wrong doorbell. A white homeowner shot him.]( BY ABIGAIL WEINBERG   [Florida poised to allow executions after 8–4 jury vote]( BY NOAH LANARD   [Biden’s plan to phase out gas cars isn’t crazy at all]( BY NITISH PAHWA Advertisement [Project Good Work]( [Special Feature] [Special Feature]( [NIMBY housing disputes are the new climate denialism]( How can we decarbonize the economy when we can’t even create dwellings? BY CLARA JEFFERY [Fiercely Independent] Support from readers allows Mother Jones to do journalism that doesn't just follow the pack. [Donate]( Did you enjoy this newsletter? Help us out by [forwarding]( it to a friend or sharing it on [Facebook]( and [Twitter](. [Mother Jones]( [Donate]( [Donate Monthly]( [Subscribe]( This message was sent to {EMAIL}. To change the messages you receive from us, you can [edit your email preferences]( or [unsubscribe from all mailings.]( For advertising opportunities see our online [media kit.]( Were you forwarded this email? [Sign up for Mother Jones' newsletters today.]( [www.MotherJones.com]( PO Box 8539, Big Sandy, TX 75755

Marketing emails from motherjones.com

View More
Sent On

09/11/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

05/11/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Sent On

27/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.