Newsletter Subject

We just lost another great newsroom.

From

motherjones.com

Email Address

newsletters@motherjones.com

Sent On

Mon, Mar 27, 2023 11:13 PM

Email Preheader Text

The new normal is decimating journalism. ? MoJo Reader, I woke up to news this morning that we're

The new normal is decimating journalism.   [Mother Jones]( MoJo Reader, I woke up to news this morning that we're losing a stalwart of independent, progressive journalism: After nearly 70 years, the great Texas Observer [will cease publication]( and lay off all staff. That hits incredibly close to home for me. The Texas Observer was part of the family of scrappy, independent magazines rooted in values of justice and democracy that Mother Jones was born into as well. Molly Ivins, perhaps its best-known writer, was a columnist for Mother Jones for a number of years, and I had the privilege of editing her at one point. Upon her passing, I wrote a little [tribute]( to what she meant to me as a young journalist, and I felt starstruck all over again when I reread it this morning: I drank up what it was like to see a woman be sharply political and yet uproariously funny, unapologetic and uncompromising, completely confident with the good old boys and completely capable of beating them at their own game, and all this without even seeming to try very hard at all. There were not many women writing like that in the 80s [or 90s], which is why I dreamed of being Molly Ivins when I grew up; there still aren’t many like her today, and magazines like Mother Jones are run and written overwhelmingly by men. Why? I don’t know exactly: Because most women are not trained, as many men have been, to presume that the world is dying to hear what we have to say? Because having an outsized personality and convictions to match makes you lonely, as a woman more so than a man? Because so many of us, anxious to get along, learn to lace our opinions, even inadvertently, with qualifiers and fudges, with "I think”s and “I could be wrong, but”s? Molly embodied the Texas Observer and the spirit of journalism without corporate overlords or deep-pocketed owners. But she knew, as everyone in this line of work has always known, that with that independence comes a lot of risk. I didn’t know that the Observer was about to go under when Brian and I kicked off our big fundraising campaign last week with "[It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal](," but in a sense, it’s what we were writing about: How hard it is keeping quality journalism afloat and why hitting our fundraising goals is so important. So, as Molly might have said, no beating around the [shrub](. As of this evening, we're five-plus days into our three-week push to raise $300,000 and we only have about $40,000 in hand. We really need that pace to pick if we're going to have any chance of finishing our fiscal year square in the coming months. And we have zero room for error, having already cut all the expenses that we could from our budget to account for the significant headwind journalism faces. If you can right now, [please help keep Mother Jones charging hard with a donation today](: $5 or $50, it all matters and makes a difference when added up with your fellow readers. For 47 years, our nonprofit model of being funded primarily by readers who aren’t forced to pay, but [choose to pitch in](, has allowed us to weather storms big and small. But those journalism storms are intensifying as the underlying conditions change. And that means we need to start raising significantly more [in donations]( from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in (or stopped doing so several years ago) because you figured others always will. Because in the end, as the Observer’s story demonstrates, it takes a wide base of support to keep a newsroom alive at a time when any one source of revenue, especially any one major donor or foundation, can and will go poof at any given time. What sets Mother Jones apart from virtually every other national newsroom in America is that we are supported by a lot of people, not mostly by people who have a lot. Like every nonprofit, we need and are grateful for grants from foundations and major donors. But what sustains our work, what makes us confident that Mother Jones will carry on, are people who [give $5 or $50 when we have to come knocking like we are right now](. People like you. Despite how nerve-wracking these fundraising campaigns can be, hoping and/or praying that [enough donations will come in](, I'm beyond grateful—especially on days like today—that Mother Jones' biggest funding source is our community of readers: 74 percent of our budget comes from donations big and small this year. Nothing else could keep us going. There is no backup, no secret benefactor. Because you know what is more powerful than checks with a lot a zeroes? A large and steady group of people [pitching in what they can when they can]( because they believe in independent journalism's ability to help bring about change. That kind of support doesn’t go poof. That kind of support is from the people who will be here next year and the year after that, who will work for change one day at a time. Tens of thousands of people doing their part to keep fearless investigative reporting alive is a powerful thing, and like every movement, it gets more powerful as it grows. And we need it to grow: It’s the only way we’ll be able to come up with that $300,000 [in donations]( we need in the next few weeks. It's the only way we can keep on doing the reporting you get from us, at our current level, amid so many uncertainties. It’s also a tall order—and more than we hoped we’d need to bank on right now—but we can 100 percent get there if more readers than normal [decide to pitch in, starting today](. I hope you will on this sad day for fearless, nonprofit reporting. Please [learn more]( about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't get elsewhere—and [help us do it with a donation]( if you can right now. We've already cut expenses, and like this morning's news made crystal clear, hitting our online goal is critical right now. Thanks for reading, and for everything you to do make Mother Jones what it is. [Monika Bauerlein, CEO] Monika Bauerlein, CEO Mother Jones [Donate](   [Mother Jones]( [Donate]( [Donate Monthly]( [Subscribe]( This message was sent to {EMAIL}. To change the messages you receive from us, you can [edit your email preferences]( or [unsubscribe from all mailings.]( For advertising opportunities see our online [media kit.]( Were you forwarded this email? [Sign up for Mother Jones' newsletters today.]( [www.MotherJones.com]( PO Box 8539, Big Sandy, TX 75755

Marketing emails from motherjones.com

View More
Sent On

24/05/2024

Sent On

23/05/2024

Sent On

23/05/2024

Sent On

22/05/2024

Sent On

21/05/2024

Sent On

21/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.