Processing what we know today. [Mother Jones]( MoJo Reader, Democracy lives to fight another dayâbut itâs got a few bruises, a black eye, and there are still many rounds to go. Iâm no good at sports metaphors (I know, you could tell), but thatâs what I came away with from yesterdayâs midterms, when the most notable defeats went to those campaigning against democracy itself. At a moment when the deck seemed stacked in favor of election deniers, conspiracy theorists, and straight-up meaniesâon top of inflation and the shellacking first-term president's normally takeâAmericans showed up and surprised the pollsters. But while that may be enough for small-d democrats to breathe a sigh of relief, itâs not a full reprieve. Just like so much of life these days (and, cough, just like our fall fundraising push that ends today). So I wanted to share some of our team's reporting with you, as we all try to wrap our heads around what we know and what it means, and for [my final ask for the donations it takes to keep Mother Jones charging hard]( if you haven't pitched in yetâall gifts from this email will be matched and go twice a far, and they are [very much]( needed. First off, the tough news: Thanks to [a slew of election deniers]( winning election (irony is dead) to Congress, we now know that, as my colleague David Corn [writes](, âa party fueled by anti-democratic election denialism and extremism can fare well in congressional districts and, with the help of gerrymandering, amass a slim majority of seats in the lower chamber. This means the Trumper extremists in the House are close to achieving a form of minority rule.â A dispassionate observer might point out that election deniers won in safely gerrymandered red districts, and that in contested races (with a few [possible exceptions]() the Big Lie did not play well. But in a caucus where most anyone who dared defy Donald Trump has been [hounded out of office](, itâs not rational to expect dispassionate observation. Instead, we can brace for two years of chaos, as a radicalized House majority delivers red meat to a rageful base. They can and will, David writes, take last nightâs result as a validation of the âlying, cheating, sabotaging elections, whipping up groundless conspiracy theories, and arousing hatred and violenceâ of the past two years. We can even begin to imagine what sort of post-election havoc they might wreak in 2024. And we can expect them to conclude that they should double down on some of the strategies that allowed them to hold on to power. Take Wisconsin, where my colleague Ari Berman has been [spending a lot of time]( the past few years: âDemocrat Tony Evers [won the governorâs race]( by nearly 3.5 pointsâpractically a landslide by Wisconsin standardsâbut Republicans are projected to win a two-thirds [supermajority]( in the state Senate and come just short of similar margins in the state assembly, which wouldâve allowed them to override Eversâ vetoes, because of the [rigged maps]( they passed in 2021.â Translation: so long as you can draw the lines your way, it doesnât matter much what the voters think. But there were, too, examples of how differently things could go, as Ari writes: âContrast that with Michigan, where a nonpartisan [citizens commission]( created by voters through a ballot referendum drew new state legislative districts after the 2020 census, creating significantly fairer and more competitive maps that allowed Democrats to retake [both chambers]( of the legislature and control state politics for the first time since 1984.â Iâve heard it said that for Democrats to champion independent redistricting is a mistakeâthat they should fight fire with fire and gerrymander as undemocratically as Republicans do when they are in control. Thatâs the tack they took in New York, [to no avail](. Maybe if youâre going to fight for small-d democracy, you have to actually mean it. One more group that lost out last night: the pundits. Womenâs rights to make their own decisions, they claimed, had nowhere near the motivating power that crime or economic fears did. Independent voters would not mind an attack on fundamental rights, so long as it came with a promise to bring down the price of gas. As Madison Pauly [writes](: "If anyone thought Kansasâs abortion referendum was a fluke this summerâwhen voters overwhelmingly rejected a proposed constitutional amendment saying there was no right to an abortion in the stateâTuesdayâs results should make them bite their lip. In every state with an abortion-related measure on the ballot, supporters of reproductive rights won the day." I know itâs been said that âno one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people,â and [people who make their living saying things on TV]( often look like Exhibit A for that. But the truth is that, even as we struggle to make sense of a chaotic and challenging time, Americans are a lot less ready to give up on democracy and human rights than many believed. Even when it comes to crime, such an easily demagogued topic, Eamon Whalon shows that endless scare ads [were not enough]( to beat back thoughtful criminal justice reform in George Floydâs home town. Last night was a powerful reminder that while democracy is on the ropes, it is not down for the count. A lie-fueled movement of resentment and revenge has captivated the core base of a major party, and thanks to the undemocratic nature of many of our institutions, thatâs a group that can command a lot of power. But itâs not (yet) a majority across the nation, by any stretch. The fight is still on, and you can bet that Mother Jones will be in it with all the tools of rigorous, fact-checkedâand lazy punditry-freeâjournalism at our disposal. Our biggest strength in that fight is you: Our community of readers who take our work out into the world and do something with it, and who know that "team reality" is not ready to give up. Thanks for turning to MoJo to help you make sense of days like today, and for bearing with me during our [hard-won]( fundraising push this last month. Like the election itself, a few weeks ago it looked pretty grim. And just like the election, it didnât turn out as badly as it might have. We're going to come up well short of our goal, which is rough, but I'm hoping that we can finish it off the best we can: Our matching gift deadline is today, but [any and all donations from this email will be matched dollar for dollar]( whenever they come in. [Monika] Monika Bauerlein, CEO
Mother Jones [Donate]( [Mother Jones]( [Donate](
[Donate Monthly](
[Subscribe]( This message was sent to {EMAIL}. To change the messages you receive from us, you can [edit your email preferences]( or [unsubscribe from all mailings.]( For advertising opportunities see our online [media kit.]( Were you forwarded this email? [Sign up for Mother Jones' newsletters today.]( [www.MotherJones.com](
PO Box 8539, Big Sandy, TX 75755