Newsletter Subject

Checking in: I'd really like to hear from you.

From

motherjones.com

Email Address

newsletters@motherjones.com

Sent On

Mon, Oct 24, 2022 11:15 PM

Email Preheader Text

I've never seen it quite like this before. ? MoJo Reader, This is a hard email to get right, so I'

I've never seen it quite like this before.   [Mother Jones]( MoJo Reader, This is a hard email to get right, so I'll start as matter-of-factly as I can, and see where it goes from there. Our fall fundraising campaign is struggling. We're over halfway through it, and so far we've only been able to bring in 20 percent of our budget—just $65,000 in hand. We've had rough patches before, but never quite like this. The emails we've sent have raised about half of what we'd expect from past campaigns. The donations that come in through our website, about half too. Even with a last-minute surge like these campaigns often have, getting to $325,000 in the next two weeks seems damn near impossible. That's hugely concerning. But instead of pleading for [your donations]( late on this Monday, I wanted to ask for your advice—and I'm reaching out to everyone I can, even those of who you recently pitched in and those of you who donate monthly. ­­­Because sometimes I forget how much I take for granted. Like last week, when I was talking to a Mother Jones reader and happened to mention that our budget now includes paying to scrub journalists' personal information off the internet because what happens online doesn't stay online. It's routine for journalists to get death threats, and more and more often they are physically assaulted. I don't usually talk about the minutiae of our budget like that, because what could be less interesting? Who wants to know that our legal expenses are up 30 percent this year versus last? Or that through the whole pandemic we had to pay all of the rent and bills on our offices and help people get what they need to work from home? Or that when you read one of our stories on your phone we make about half a penny in advertising revenue, thanks to the economics of online advertising and the cut that platforms like Facebook take? (People are also way less likely to donate when they use one of those small screens.) It's my job to worry about those numbers. That's what I signed up for when I took this after a lifetime in the newsroom. And it's 100 percent worth it when I see how much people appreciate that they can trust what they see in Mother Jones, and how hard our team works to make it all possible. One of those budget lines is for support from our online readers. It's one of the most important ones, nearly $1.4 million—about 7 percent of our entire budget. And it's a particularly white-knuckle one, because so many things can interfere with it. We put our best case for support out there, and then it's out of our control. Is it an election year, when people get sooooo many requests from candidates, and journalism is pretty far down their list? Did one of the many news outlets that pick up our reporting give us credit, for a change, motivating folks to donate? Did we send enough emails to make sure they don't get buried in your inboxes? Did we send too many and turn you off? But maybe the biggest question of all is: Did we—did I—make the case well enough? Did I explain why independent journalism can't be allowed to dwindle at this moment in history? Did I do a good enough job showing how fearless reporting really has an impact? Were we too bold when we put together our budget and bet that people would step up so we could keep our reporters on the beat? Everyone with responsibility (and all of us are responsible for a lot, in our homes and at our jobs) struggles with these kinds of questions. It's called impostor syndrome, and it's probably a good or at least natural thing. If you don't worry about whether you're rising to the challenge, you're probably not trying hard enough. So, as long as I'm being vulnerable, let me ask you: Is any of this making sense to you? I'm really trying to understand why our donations are so far off right now so we can start righting the ship ASAP, and who better to ask than you all. If you've supported our work before, thank you—can you tell me why and what convinced you to do it? If you're not able to or just haven't yet, I'd love to know what draws you to our reporting and why you think it matters. If you've given in the past but not anymore, can you say why? [If you have anything at all to share, please fill out the form here—it's the easiest way for us to manage replies](. I need to know these things, because the responsibility I signed up for is to keep paying all those important bills: To protect our journalists, to keep the website humming, to get the truth out to as many people as possible. And right now, the way I'm making the case is not quite resonating like it should and has in the past. There's got to be a way I can do better. [Tell me how](. Meanwhile I'll tell you one of the many reasons that keep me at it. The other day I was headed to Chicago to meet with Mother Jones readers and supporters. On the plane, I worked on documents with the Mother Jones logo on them. And after a while the lady in the next seat turned to me: "Excuse me? Are you a journalist?" Yes, I said, bracing for what might come next—it's not like most people love journalists. "With Mother Jones?" Yes (more bracing). She beamed. "I've used your articles in my classes!" She was a professor at a community college, on a trip taking students to historically Black colleges and universities on the East Coast. She had taught a course focused on issues of parenting and adoption, and had used a Mother Jones article about the international industry recruiting women in poorer countries to bear children for those in wealthier countries. Her students, she said, were smart, skeptical, and hungry for in-depth information. They had profound disagreements about big issues, and she was trying to teach them how to discuss those issues with solid information, grace, and empathy for each other. If she could do that work every day, I thought, and if a MoJo article could be useful for her as part of it, it was worth it. And when I made it to Chicago and the event with MoJo readers and supporters, it was another big shot in the arm. It was the first gathering we've had there in a while, and it was powerful being in community again—it was also a fundraising event, and I think that sense of togetherness really helped bring new folks into the fold. Of course, there's no way to recreate that online, but I thought baring a bit of my soul and asking our online community to help me understand what's going on might be more fruitful than another increasingly urgent appeal for donations today. There's plenty of time—well, two weeks—for that after hearing from you all. Two final details, as long as I'm laying it all out: Why $325,000 and an Election Day deadline? We break that $1.4 million online budget into three big campaigns a year in the spring, fall, and December, so that we don't have to be fundraising all the time. With people reading less news these days, we thought these weeks ahead of the midterms, with heightened attention and urgency, would be the right time for the fall pledge drive. Maybe it wasn't. What happens if we come up way short in the next few weeks? It's not lights out for MoJo, but if we continue to struggle with online fundraising, we're going to have some hard decisions to make—while still trying to get as close to that $1.4 million number as we can by June. So please do [let me know]( if you think there's a better way to go about this while we take a moment to regroup. Thanks for reading, and for everything you to do make Mother Jones what it is. [Monika] Monika Bauerlein, CEO Mother Jones [Donate](   [Mother Jones]( [Donate]( [Subscribe]( This message was sent to {EMAIL}. To change the messages you receive from us, you can [edit your email preferences]( or [unsubscribe from all mailings.]( For advertising opportunities see our online [media kit.]( Were you forwarded this email? [Sign up for Mother Jones' newsletters today.]( [www.MotherJones.com]( PO Box 8539, Big Sandy, TX 75755

EDM Keywords (218)

yet year worth worry worked work whether weeks website way wants wanted useful used us unsubscribe universities understand turn trying truth trust took time thought think things thank tell teach taught talking take supporters supported support students struggling struggle stories start soul sometimes signed sent sense send see say said routine rising right responsible responsibility reporting reporters rent recreate receive reading reaching raised questions put protect professor probably powerful possible plenty please pleading plane pick phone penny pay past part parenting online one often offices numbers next newsroom need much monday moment mojo minutiae might midterms messages message mention meet meanwhile maybe matters matter many making make mailings made love lot long list like lights lifetime let laying lady know kinds keep june journalists journalism job issues internet interfere instead inboxes impact hungry homes home history help hearing hear headed hard happens happened hand halfway half got good going goes go given getting get fundraising fruitful forwarded form forget fold far factly explain expect excuse everything everyone event even empathy emails edit economics dwindle draws donations donate documents discuss december days day cut course could convinced control continue community come close classes chicago checking change challenge case candidates budget bring break bracing bold bit bills better bet beamed asking ask articles arm anything anymore also allowed advice adoption able

Marketing emails from motherjones.com

View More
Sent On

09/11/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

05/11/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Sent On

27/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.