Newsletter Subject

It's not accurate 100% of the time, but...

From

motherjones.com

Email Address

newsletters@motherjones.com

Sent On

Wed, Aug 10, 2022 04:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

"It was in Mother Jones six months ago." MoJo Reader, “If it's in the New York Times, it was in

"It was in Mother Jones six months ago." [Mother Jones]( MoJo Reader, “If it's in the New York Times, it was in Mother Jones six months ago.” That quote is from Jeff Cohen, who co-founded the media watchdog group Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, and he said it some years back in making a point about how MoJo's nonprofit journalism is often ahead of the curve. And every once in a while, a story comes around to remind me that it's still true. Like this past Friday. Times columnist Farhad Manjoo [wrote about]( the "excesses of the private equity investment industry," as members of Congress took aim at the industry's favorite tax loophole, which costs taxpayers [up to $18 billion]( each year, and which a huge majority of voters (and even, if you can believe what he said in 2016, Donald Trump) want to see closed. Manjoo gives a great overview. He points to Tim Murphy's [brief and enraging history]( of how the industry's giant tax dodge has endured despite widespread opposition (and, thanks to Kyrsten Sinema, apparently [will survive again]( this time), and he mentioned that Tim's piece was part of an "excellent, multipart investigation of the private equity industry" that we published back in May. It felt good to be credited (a more typical m.o. is for a big outlet to just quietly pilfer a story), and I guess this time it only took three months for our reporting to make it to the Times. News moves fast, you know. And there was a lot going on when we first published the [private equity project](. It came out the week after the Roe leak and just before the horrific mass shootings in Buffalo and Uvalde. When I first wrote to you all in the MoJo community about it, in late June, it was probably drowned out by the stunning details from the January 6 investigation, not to mention the Supreme Court overturning Roe. That's kind of the point though: Sometimes you have to go after a big story that isn't in the headlines. In "[The 'Animal Spirits of Capitalism' Are Devouring Us](," I tried to explain why we went deep on private equity even though we knew that it wasn't going to go viral or make a huge splash right away. We knew not enough people were reporting on this story of corporate power run amok, and that this lack of visibility is a big part of why private equity firms get away with their worst abuses (a point Manjoo addresses as well). And we knew that you all in the Mother Jones community want us to do big-picture, ahead-of-the-curve journalism like it. (Or like [this](, [this](, and [this](.) So for six months, the newsroom kept digging into private equity from many angles. Their work ended up taking up a [full issue of our magazine]( and an online package that has staying power beyond any one (exhausting) summer's worth of breaking news. It often goes like that with deep, investigative work that truly reveals something about the "the great unelected power wielders of our time," as MoJo co-founder Adam Hochschild put it years ago. You have to put in the work, and many newsrooms can't do that when the clicks won't stack up in the tough media landscape we're in. If you read these emails from me regularly, you are either my mom or someone else who cares quite a bit about Mother Jones, and so you know that our summer fundraising drive came up pretty short. And you can probably see why we will pretty much always face stiff financial headwinds—those folks making bank on private equity are not exactly racing to support tough-minded independent reporting like ours. So one final ask: Will you [consider starting a small monthly donation today to keep us charging hard for the long haul](? Anyone who pitches in $5/month or more gets our print magazine for free, six times a year, and each issue is packed full of our biggest investigations and other stories with staying power—the kind you might just find in the Times six, or three, months down the road. The honest-to-goodness truth is that right now, a month and change into our new budgeting cycle, my colleague Brian—who works with me on online fundraising—and I are really racking our brains over how we can realistically raise the $1.4 million or so we need from our online community in the next 11 months. It's going to be tougher than ever. So, [if even a small fraction of you who are still reading this can part with a few bucks, just $5 or $15, a month it would help us out a lot right now](. I hope you'll consider it. Thanks for reading, and for everything you do to make Mother Jones what it is. We love doing it all for you and with you. [Monika] Monika Bauerlein, CEO Mother Jones [Donate]( [Mother Jones]( [Donate]( [Subscribe]( This message was sent to {EMAIL}. To change the messages you receive from us, you can [edit your email preferences]( or [unsubscribe from all mailings.]( For advertising opportunities see our online [media kit.]( Were you forwarded this email? [Sign up for Mother Jones' newsletters today.]( [www.MotherJones.com]( PO Box 8539, Big Sandy, TX 75755

Marketing emails from motherjones.com

View More
Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

28/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.