Newsletter Subject

"What's the point?" my kid asked.

From

motherjones.com

Email Address

newsletters@motherjones.com

Sent On

Fri, Jun 10, 2022 10:20 PM

Email Preheader Text

I couldn't sleep, so I wrote this. ? MoJo Reader, History will judge. History will judge. History

I couldn't sleep, so I wrote this.   [Mother Jones]( MoJo Reader, History will judge. History will judge. History will judge. Those were the words that kept ringing in my head as my teen and I watched the [nine-minute-59-second montage]( of the attack on the Capitol in the January 6 committee hearing last night. It was kind of surreal, being reminded of all the awful details, seeing Donald Trump onscreen once more commanding his supporters to "fight like hell." And what of William Barr calling "bullshit"? When this is shown in classrooms one day, I wondered, will people see it as the beginning of something, or the end? Will they mourn that we were not able to reverse America's slide into authoritarianism—or see, in the fact that the coup did not succeed, the beginning of something more hopeful? History will judge. "To my Republican colleagues who are defending the indefensible," Rep. Liz Cheney had said in her [opening statement](. "There will come a day when Donald Trump is gone. But your dishonor will remain." History will judge. It will judge Capitol Police officer Caroline Edwards, who, after getting a concussion from being knocked to the ground by the mob, [got up and ran]( to hold the line at the West Terrace. It will judge Tucker Carlson, who [took note]( of the hearing only to say that he was tired of getting a "lecture on January 6." But will we judge, in the present? That's harder to answer. The committee has been working for nearly a year—a year during which the Republican leadership has [pivoted from condemnation]( of what Trump unleashed to a full-on embrace. But Trump's loyalists are not a majority in America. So what about everyone else? What does the committee's presentation—a "master class" in investigative storytelling, as MoJo's editor-in-chief, Clara Jeffery, [put it](—mean for the rest of us? That depends in part on the media and how the story is presented to those Americans—two-thirds of us—who [assign Trump some or much of the blame]( for the attack. As MoJo's Washington bureau chief, David Corn, [pointed out](, "much coverage of the January 6 committee and its hearings has up to now focused on the political implications: Will this help the Democrats for the coming midterm elections? Such framing is a disservice, as it turns this singular event into merely another point of made-for-cable-TV conflict." By airing the hearings live, the networks are letting the committee ([advised by a TV veteran]() present the evidence to the public directly. Will they revert to the politics-as-sports tone afterward? Early indicators aren't great. "If you don't deliver a bombshell on Thursday," Face the Nation host Margaret Brennan [asked]( Rep. Adam Schiff last weekend, "don't you run the risk of losing the public's attention here?" As MoJo's Dan Friedman and Pema Levy pointed out in a [must-read piece](: "Waiting for new bombshells risks overlooking what we already know. Trump orchestrated the attempt to overturn the election in plain sight. He spread the 'Big Lie' that the presidency had been stolen. He [promoted]( a massive DC rally on January 6, and former campaign aides [helped]( plan it. Trump publicly [encouraged]( supporters to attend the event, and then he told them to march on the Capitol. He publicly [pressured]( Pence to throw out electoral votes—something Pence made clear he had no power to do. And Trump [delayed]( calling for an end to the attack once it had started. Maybe there is something worse we can learn about what happened that day. But what we already know is bad enough." As it turns out, we are learning worse things (Jared Kushner shrugging off as "whining" the despair among White House lawyers at their boss's unhinged machinations stood out to me). But does it matter? "What's the point if no one is getting punished?" one of my kids asked as we watched, and I tried to explain that the committee has evidence it believes justifies criminal charges, but [has struggled]( with whether to send it to prosecutors. “Why?” my kid asked. They worry what people might think about it, I said. It's not something our institutions have really been designed for. Not a good answer. The question kept rolling around in my head when I couldn't sleep. What's the point if no one's getting punished? Then I remembered a conversation I had with a Russian journalist not long ago. He had [investigated]( atrocities by the Russian army in Ukraine. This story would probably not change the course of the war, he said. But did that mean his work had been pointless? No, he said: "I am making an historical record." Someday perhaps it would be used in a tribunal, or in classrooms. History will judge. "We must confront the truth with candor, resolve, and determination," Rep. Bennie Thompson said in his opening remarks last night. "We need to show that we are worthy of the gifts that are the birthright of every American." Those gifts include finding and speaking the truth, which is also what Mother Jones exists to do, and that's probably a big reason why you look to our reporting. And I can tell you one thing: Because we answer to our readers and you tell us you want us to, we have been telling the truth about extremist rhetoric and violence. We dedicated a cover story in our magazine to the rise of the [Oath Keepers](, who you saw lead a coordinated charge into the Capitol last night, back in 2010. We dug into Telegram to see how the [Proud Boys](, who were featured too many times to count last night, were talking about Trump's "stand by" directive. We [investigated]( how Trump was embracing and mainstreaming extremists in 2016, and we [warned]( in December 2020 that he had become "an arsonist of radicalization." It's why, when politicians were claiming that the rioters were mere tourists, we exposed how many [were armed](. And it's why we will keep investigating attacks on democracy long after the hearings are done. So, what's the point if no one is getting punished? It's still not impossible to rule out that accountability will ultimately be delivered. But we damn sure know that history will judge. Thanks for reading, and for everything you do to make Mother Jones what it is. I wouldn't be doing my job today if I didn't also mention that we're staring down a significant $270,000 gap in our online fundraising budget to close by June 30, in less than three weeks, gulp. So if you're able to [help us confront the truth with candor, resolve, and determination by donating today](, we'd be so grateful. And to those of you who have recently pitched in, thank you so much—we couldn't do it without you. [Monika] Monika Bauerlein, CEO Mother Jones [Donate](   [Mother Jones]( [Donate]( [Subscribe]( This message was sent to {EMAIL}. To change the messages you receive from us, you can [edit your email preferences]( or [unsubscribe from all mailings.]( For advertising opportunities see our online [media kit.]( Were you forwarded this email? [Sign up for Mother Jones' newsletters today.]( [www.MotherJones.com]( PO Box 8539, Big Sandy, TX 75755

EDM Keywords (198)

year wrote would worthy worry working work words wondered without whining whether watched warned war violence used us unsubscribe ultimately ukraine turns truth trump tried tribunal told tired throw thank telling tell telegram teen talking surreal supporters succeed struggled story stolen still staring stand spread speaking something slide sleep shown show sent send see say said run rule risk rise rioters revert rest reporting reminded remembered receive really reading readers ran radicalization public prosecutors promoted probably presidency presented presentation present power politics politicians pointless point pivoted part overturn one networks need nearly much mourn mojo messages message media mean matter march many making majority mailings magazine made loyalists losing look line letting less lecture learn knocked kind judge investigated institutions impossible hold history help hearings hearing head harder happened ground great grateful gone gifts getting full framing forwarded focused featured fact exposed explain evidence everything event end embracing embrace election editor edit dug done disservice dishonor directive determination designed depends democrats delivered deliver defending dedicated day course coup conversation condemnation concussion committee commanding come close claiming change capitol boss bombshell blame birthright beginning become authoritarianism attention attend attempt attack arsonist armed answer america also airing accountability able 2016 2010

Marketing emails from motherjones.com

View More
Sent On

24/05/2024

Sent On

23/05/2024

Sent On

23/05/2024

Sent On

22/05/2024

Sent On

21/05/2024

Sent On

21/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.