Newsletter Subject

Attention, liberals: Neil Young is not your savior

From

motherjones.com

Email Address

newsletters@motherjones.com

Sent On

Tue, Jan 25, 2022 10:18 PM

Email Preheader Text

January 25, 2022 Hey, I'm Jacob Rosenberg, an Assistant Editor at Mother Jones. Let's start this new

[View in browser]( [Mother Jones Daily Newsletter]( January 25, 2022 Hey, I'm Jacob Rosenberg, an Assistant Editor at Mother Jones. Let's start this newsletter in an insane place, shall we? A while ago, after a not-too-hard-feelings break-up—in that brief haze where you get a little extra honest and jokey and spill out a secret or two as you chat about why it didn't work—someone explained to me that I was "way too into Neil Young." It was a red flag, she explained. And most importantly, she continued, it was annoying. Hmm, I thought. That just can't be right! Because liking Neil Young is cool—he rocks—and yes, I am obsessive about it. I listen to him most days, buy multiple books about him, and read his ersatz newspaper cum blog [The Neil Young Archives Times Contrarian]( also daily. But real heads of Neil Young take it to another level. They can tell you in Deadhead-esque tones the best bootlegged live shows from the 1990s, the exact backstory of each members of his band Crazy Horse, and why he made a song for the 2017 feature film Bright. Honestly, I'm a poser. Plus, how could it be annoying to want to talk about whether or not Chrome Dream II (and especially that opener, "Beautiful Bluebird") is "all-time underrated?" Everyone is asking. (Editor's note: No one is asking.) So, this is a long way of saying two things: I am still single, and I learned a lesson that, actually, it can be annoying to talk too much about Neil Young. I wish many people on the internet had the same experience. Over the past day or so, there has been way too much talk of Neil Young. On Monday, [Rolling Stone]( reported that Young had posted on his website (that newspaper I mentioned, The NYA Times Contrarian, to be exact) an open letter to his management team requesting his music be taken off Spotify because the streaming service was spreading vaccine misinformation by paying tons of money to Joe Rogan. Since then, this blew up into a little war among the most [annoying]( [posters]( [online](. It's been trending on Twitter for a good bit now. No matter that Young quickly deleted the post and that, since then, he hasn’t really said anything, although [his manager did tell the Daily Beast vaccine misinformation is important to him](. Still, everyone continues spilling out, posting about whether Neil Young is hero or delusional idiot trying to take down lord of clout Joe Rogan. It's a good example of how some small news item—this Rolling Stone post is like three paragraphs—can start a Rube Goldberg machine of posters who must respond with their take. It's just kind of dumb though. Young just barely put his stuff back on Spotify three years ago, in 2019. His protest then? Sound quality. Since then, over the past year or so, he has been working with Amazon (yes, them! Amazon!) to release music that has a higher quality. He wrote a book (that I bought, yes) about his quest. I can dive more deeply into all the reasons you shouldn't deify Neil: the Reagan phase in the 1980s, his pretty bad response to January 6, the thing about me being single still. But suffice it to say: Neil Young's politics are as imperfect, weird, and fascinating as his music. They are not built for this sort of good/bad binary. You're going down a dark hole. He's not going to save you. —Jacob Rosenberg P.S. We're hiring! Mother Jones is looking for a climate reporter who will dig deep on environmental justice in a flexible position tailored to the right candidate's individual passions. We're an equal opportunity employer committed to creating a diverse and inclusive work environment, and we especially encourage members of traditionally underrepresented communities to apply. Oh, and we offer great benefits, including health, dental, and vision coverage with premiums fully paid by the company. Check out the full job description [here](, and apply using [this form](. We can't wait to hear from you! Advertisement [For What It's Worth]( [Top Story] [Top Story]( [Will This Court Case End the “Subminimum Wage”?]( Restaurants can pay some staff as little as $2.13 an hour—unless this case puts an end to it. BY EMILY HOFSTAEDTER [Trending] [The oil industry is terrified of college kids]( BY NITISH PAHWA [Plugging orphaned oil and gas wells is going to cost us a fortune]( BY NICK BOWLIN [Jan. 6 committee confirms it's already spoken to former AG Barr about Trump's plan to seize voting machines]( BY FERNANDA ECHAVARRI [The internet can't stop dunking on Mitch McConnell]( BY JACKIE FLYNN MOGENSEN Advertisement [For What It's Worth]( [Special Feature] [Special Feature]( [If You’re Wondering Who’s Paying for All That Ivermectin—You Are]( Study finds insurers and taxpayers shelled out more than $130 million for a drug that doesn’t work. BY KIERA BUTLER [Fiercely Independent] Support from readers allows Mother Jones to do journalism that doesn't just follow the pack. [Donate]( Did you enjoy this newsletter? Help us out by [forwarding]( it to a friend or sharing it on [Facebook]( and [Twitter](. [Mother Jones]( [Donate]( [Subscribe]( This message was sent to {EMAIL}. To change the messages you receive from us, you can [edit your email preferences]( or [unsubscribe from all mailings.]( For advertising opportunities see our online [media kit.]( Were you forwarded this email? [Sign up for Mother Jones' newsletters today.]( [www.MotherJones.com]( PO Box 8539, Big Sandy, TX 75755

Marketing emails from motherjones.com

View More
Sent On

09/11/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

05/11/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Sent On

27/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.