Biden just delivered one of his most impassioned speeches yet

[View in browser]( [Mother Jones Daily Newsletter]( July 13, 2021 If you're unready to move on from the maelstrom of the previous presidency, a [forthcoming book]( by two Washington Post reporters is sure to give you your fix of Trumpian drama. In an excerpt published today in [WaPo](, journalists Carol D. Leonnig and Philip Rucker paint a damning picture of election night in the Trump White House. Trump, like many people watching the election at home, seemed stunned that mail-in ballots, which tended to be counted late, heavily favored Joe Biden. Rudy Giuliani repeatedly chimed in, "Just say we won." Trump seemed convinced that he actually had won. "They’re stealing this from us," he reportedly said. "I won in a landslide and they’re taking it back." If that's not your cup of tea, check out Frankly, We Did Win This Election, a [just-released book]( from the Wall Street Journal's Michael Bender. One scene in particular made [headlines]( today: Trump flying off the handle when details leaked to the press of the former first family taking cover in an underground bunker during protests against police violence. Not much about the Trump presidency will surprise me at this point. But I'll continue to eat up all the details and postmortem evaluations, because who can resist? —Abigail Weinberg P.S. Our fundraising drive ends on Saturday, we have about $114,000 left to reach our goal, and it's going to take a surge in last-minute donations to get there. We really enjoy putting together these newsletters for you each day, and if you find them useful, I hope you might consider [supporting our team's work with a donation during this big final push](. (And THANK YOU to everyone who has!) Advertisement [Oxford University Press]( [Top Story] [Top Story]( [Biden Delivered His Most Impassioned Speech on Voting Rights Yet. But He Failed to Even Mention the Filibuster.]( Though expected, voting rights advocates are certain to be disappointed by the president's speech. BY INAE OH AND ARI BERMAN [Trending] [Democrats promised “No climate, no deal.” But they haven't decided what that means.]( BY KARA VOGHT [Texas Dems to Biden, Congress: Show the same courage we've shown to protect voting rights]( BY INAE OH [A major ransomware group goes dark just days after a threat from Biden]( BY AJ VICENS [Richard Branson's space flight was fun. But who is he taking for a ride?]( BY RUSS CHOMA Advertisement [Oxford University Press ]( [Food] [Special Feature]( [For Central Valley farmworkers, no escape from stifling heat]( "Why are we even here?" BY MAANVI SINGH [Fiercely Independent] Support from readers allows Mother Jones to do journalism that doesn't just follow the pack. [Donate]( [Recharge] SOME GOOD NEWS, FOR ONCE [Here’s How Biden’s New Executive Order Could Shake Up Big Ag]( Last Friday, President Joe Biden released a sweeping [executive order]( on “Promoting Competition in the American Economy,” aimed at taking on massive corporations that dominate multiple marketplaces. Much of the focus of this trustbusting has been on tech. But as I [wrote]( in March, the antitrust proponents Biden appointed have also been fierce critics of Big Ag. The order looks likely to fulfill that framework: an attempt to rein in not only Amazon but the handful of corporations that have loomed over the US food system for years, too. In the food economy, massive firms have exerted [downward pressure]( on [workers’ wages](, boosting returns to shareholders while causing widespread poverty for farm, fast food, and meatpacking workers. They’ve used their outsize power to force their will on farmers, shaping decisions over the [seeds they plant,]( the [chemicals they spray](, and the [conditions of the animals they raise](. “Farmers are squeezed between concentrated market power in the agricultural input industries—seed, fertilizer, feed, and equipment suppliers—and concentrated market power in the channels for selling agricultural products,” the [order]( explains. “As a result, farmers’ share of the value of their agricultural products has decreased, and poultry farmers, hog farmers, cattle ranchers, and other agricultural workers struggle to retain autonomy and to make sustainable returns.” For decades, US administrations have allowed agribusinesses to merge largely unimpeded, insisting that fewer companies means more efficiency and lower prices for consumers, including cheap food. Biden’s order rejects that logic, arguing that hyper-consolidation squeezes farmers and other workers and can actually jack up food prices. As the order [says,]( “Four large meat-packing companies dominate over [80](% of the beef market and, over the last five years, farmers’ share of the price of beef has dropped by more than a [quarter](—from 51.5% to 37.3%—while the [retail] price of beef has risen.” For various dysfunctions in our food system—poverty wages for workers, tight margins for farmers—the order points the finger at unchecked corporate power, and it goes on to call for remedies to level the playing field. On the labor front, the order instructs the Federal Trade Commission—now chaired by [antitrust stalwart Lina Khan](—to “ban or limit” the practice of forcing employees to sign contracts prohibiting them for working for competitors, in what are known as “noncompete agreements.” These tools are most famously employed in the tech industry—allowing, say, Google to prevent a star engineer from taking a higher-paid job at Facebook and thus dampening overall wages in high-earning fields. But [highly profitable]( fast-food companies freely [impose them too](, limiting opportunities and pay raises for a labor force so dismally compensated that [more than half]( have to rely on public assistance programs. For farmers, the order challenges the power that giant meatpacking companies exert over livestock markets in several ways. In 2016, in the waning days of the Obama administration, the US Department of Agriculture issued a [blunt assessment]( of the state of the poultry industry, portraying it as dominated by a handful of chicken processors that “often wield market power” against the farmers who raise the nations’ chickens, “treating [farmers] unfairly, suppressing how much they are paid, or pitting them against each other.” The Obama USDA belatedly proposed rules (which I [spelled out here]() that would make it easier for farmers to sue companies for unfair treatment. The Trump administration promptly nixed them. The new executive order pushes the USDA to revive the rule. The order also directs the USDA to ensure that meat products labeled “Product of USA” are actually grown here. The handful of companies that dominate meat production—led by US-based giants Tyson and Cargill, Brazil-owned JBS, and Smithfield, whose parent company is headquartered in China—can slap that label on meat raised elsewhere and cut into parts (or even just repackage) in the United States. The order requires the USDA to issue a report on the impact of market concentration in seeds and other agriculture inputs—reviving an effort undertaken by the Obama Department of Justice but abruptly dropped without explanation, as I [reported]( in 2012. “Just four companies control most of the world’s seeds, and corn seed prices have gone up as much as 30 percent annually,” according to the fact sheet. Those same companies—Bayer Crop Science (formerly Monsanto), Corteva (the spinoff of the Dow-DuPont merger), Syngenta, and BASF—also basically own the global pesticide market and often use their seed dominance to [push farmers into buying more pesticides](. No single executive order can transform the precarious conditions faced by farmers in a food system dominated by giant corporations that exist to maximize profits for shareholders. But the Promoting Competition in the American Economy edict marks a start—and a break from a half-century of laissez-faire antitrust policy. Farmer and labor advocates hailed the order: “Not since Teddy Roosevelt and Franklin D. Roosevelt has a President taken on corporate power to this extent,” Missouri farmer Joe Maxwell, president of Family Farm Action Alliance and a long-time critic of corporate consolidation in agriculture markets, said in a statement. Marc Perrone, president of the United Food and Commercial Workers International union, added that the “action puts workers and consumers first by strengthening oversight of meatpacking monopolies that suppress wages and drive up food prices at the grocery store.” —Tom Philpott Did you enjoy this newsletter? Help us out by [forwarding]( it to a friend or sharing it on [Facebook]( and [Twitter](. [Mother Jones]( [Donate]( [Subscribe]( This message was sent to {EMAIL}. To change the messages you receive from us, you can [edit your email preferences]( or [unsubscribe from all mailings.]( For advertising opportunities see our online [media kit.]( Were you forwarded this email? [Sign up for Mother Jones' newsletters today.]( [www.MotherJones.com]( PO Box 8539, Big Sandy, TX 75755