Newsletter Subject

The GOP can't turn to racist, sexist attacks on Biden. Now they're stumped.

From

motherjones.com

Email Address

newsletters@motherjones.com

Sent On

Mon, Apr 26, 2021 06:57 PM

Email Preheader Text

April 26, 2021 As more are vaccinated and coronavirus restrictions continue to lift, will you be inc

[View in browser]( [Mother Jones Daily Newsletter]( April 26, 2021 As more are vaccinated and coronavirus restrictions continue to lift, will you be inclined to close off social interactions to your closest friends and your closest friends only, or are you still excited at the prospect of engaging with some of the more supporting characters in your life? Co-workers, friends of friends, neighbors, etc. It's something that's been prompting some debate on Twitter today, and for once, I've been finding the various takes a bit illuminating for my own life. (Here's a [great piece]( from the Atlantic from back in January, capturing why I'm leaning toward the second camp.) Whatever your preference might be, just remember that getting vaccinated—[which includes getting your SECOND SHOT](, something a new report reveals many are skipping out on—is key to your future social life! —Inae Oh Advertisement [ACLU]( [Top Story] [Top Story]( [Child Protective Services Investigates Half of all Black Children in California]( A new study finds pervasive racial bias in the child welfare system. BY JULIA LURIE [Trending] [He defended Chauvin and wouldn't call Floyd's death a homicide. Now his record is under investigation.]( BY INAE OH [What the hell is going on at the Columbus police department?]( BY SAMANTHA MICHAELS [Republicans can't figure out how to turn their usual racist, sexist attacks against Biden]( BY TIM MURPHY [This is our last best chance to deal with the global climate crisis]( BY JEFF GOODELL Advertisement [ACLU]( [Health & Environment] [Special Feature]( [Seriously Go Get Your Second Shot!]( Unless you got Johnson & Johnson! BY TIM MURPHY [Fiercely Independent] Support from readers allows Mother Jones to do journalism that doesn't just follow the pack. [Donate]( [Recharge] SOME GOOD NEWS, FOR ONCE [Vaccine Materials and Supplies Are Finally Heading to Hard-Hit India]( The devastation couldn’t be more severe. Yesterday, India recorded its highest single-day death toll from COVID for the ninth consecutive day, and the highest new number of cases anywhere in the world. But the United States [announced]( it’s immediately shipping supplies and tapping “every resource at our disposal” for aid, including rapid testing kits, oxygen, protective gear, and vaccine material. The pledge is reactive, not proactive, but it’s a big step. On the moral and medical questions, there’s an excellent [interview](, published yesterday, by New Yorker writer Daniel A. Gross with philosopher Peter Singer, whose pioneering texts on effective altruism—how to do the most good—contain a prescription for pandemic relief. “Where does responsibility lie for making the distribution more equitable?” Singer’s answer persuasively compares pandemic aid to climate action: “Governments should be getting together so that the burden is distributed equitably among affluent nations, just as we get together in the Paris agreement.” It’s not a controversial idea, but he welcomes controversy on other fronts. Last week he co-launched the peer-reviewed Journal of Controversial Ideas, “a response,” Singer says, “to a worrying trend of restricting freedom of thought and discussion, including in academic life.” The journal focuses on lightning-rod ideas without fear of intimidation by “petitions or letters signed against them,” a fear that backfoots many early-career academics and media workers, he says, who wouldn’t chance their comfort or employment to discuss and defend essential questions. Which is how Singer got his own start, planting a flag for concepts, including animal rights, that land crosswise for many carnivores and traditionalists who steer clear of his philosophy. The journal is “particularly aimed at protecting junior academics who don’t have tenure.” The full [Q&A]( is worth a read. Whether the [journal]( itself meets a high bar, decide for yourself. But if unflinching academic analysis makes you queasy, brace for impact. For the faint of philosophical heart, turn instead to the 10th-anniversary [edition]( of his book The Life You Can Save: How to Do Your Part to End World Poverty. —Daniel King Did you enjoy this newsletter? Help us out by [forwarding]( it to a friend or sharing it on [Facebook]( and [Twitter](. [Mother Jones]( [Donate]( [Subscribe]( This message was sent to {EMAIL}. To change the messages you receive from us, you can [edit your email preferences]( or [unsubscribe from all mailings.]( For advertising opportunities see our online [media kit.]( Were you forwarded this email? [Sign up for Mother Jones' newsletters today.]( [www.MotherJones.com]( PO Box 8539, Big Sandy, TX 75755

Marketing emails from motherjones.com

View More
Sent On

09/11/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

05/11/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Sent On

27/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.