Newsletter Subject

"You need water to live": Buttigieg explains infrastructure to Republicans

From

motherjones.com

Email Address

newsletters@motherjones.com

Sent On

Mon, Apr 5, 2021 06:55 PM

Email Preheader Text

April 5, 2021 Happy Monday! Today, we're taking a look at President Biden's , as well as the opening

[View in browser]( [Mother Jones Daily Newsletter]( April 5, 2021 Happy Monday! Today, we're taking a look at President Biden's [new infrastructure plan](, as well as the opening salvos from Republicans who have launched an all-out assault against the package. Politico calls the burgeoning fight a [potential threat]( to Biden's "bipartisan brand." But a closer look at the GOP's first round of attacks has me more concerned about the party's understanding—or lack thereof—of what infrastructure is in the first place. Thankfully, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg [hit the cable news shows on Sunday]( to unpack the apparent confusion. "I heard the governor of South Dakota recently saying, ‘This isn’t infrastructure—it's got money for pipes,'" Buttigieg told George Stephanopoulos. "Well, we believe that pipes are infrastructure, because you need water to live, and too many families now live with the threat of lead poisoning." Yes, as my colleague Becca Andrews [writes](, you need water to live—a concept Republicans just can't seem to grasp. Here's to hoping Buttigieg remains available in the coming weeks to explain the hard stuff. —Inae Oh Advertisement [Philanthropy Together]( [Top Story] [Top Story]( [“Taxpayer Dollars”: The Origins of Austerity’s Racist Catchphrase]( How the myth of the overburdened white taxpayer was made. BY CAMILLE WALSH [Trending] [Pope Francis criticizes "scandalous" military spending during pandemic]( BY BECCA ANDREWS ["You need water to live": Pete Buttigieg explains infrastructure to Republicans]( BY BECCA ANDREWS [As corporate America comes out for voting rights, where's next?]( BY SAMANTHA MICHAELS [Republicans rush to cancel baseball]( BY CLINT HENDLER Advertisement [Philanthropy Together]( [Health & Environment] [Special Feature]( [Oil-Exporting Nations Warned to Diversify Industries—or Face Civil Unrest]( Amid green-energy shift, too many eggs in one basket is a recipe for instability, report says. BY SAEED KAMALI DEHGHAN [Fiercely Independent] Support from readers allows Mother Jones to do journalism that doesn't just follow the pack. [Donate]( [Recharge] SOME GOOD NEWS, FOR ONCE [Stream “MONTERO (Call Me By Your Name)” If You’re a “Good” Christian]( What does it mean to be a “good” Christian? I grew up in the Evangelical Covenant Church and in the company of YoungLife—an over-the-top, (some would even joke) cult group for adolescent, “friendly” evangelicalism. The question was a part of daily life. It is a part of my daily life. (I still practice the Christian faith.) And Lil Nas X’s new song and video, “MONTERO (Call Me By Your Name)” seemed to re-stoke that debate within me. Amid a flurry of Christian imagery—the Garden of Eden, a snake, heaven and hell, ancient Rome, the devil—Montero (Lil Nas X’s given name) asks where he fits into God’s world. Or, if he fits at all. And it struck me. This is one of the most obvious Christian works I’ve seen! And yet, many Christians didn’t see it that way. “Devil worshipping, wicked nonsense,” [a pastor called it](. The governor of South Dakota, Republican Kristi Noem, [weighed in]( with similar anger. After seeing Lil Nas X collaborated with fashion brand MSCHF (pronounced “mischief”) to launch limited edition “Satan Shoes” in promotion of the track (each shoe contained a single drop of human blood), Noem even took to Twitter to claim that the only thing more exclusive than these sneakers was “[our kids’] God-given eternal soul.” Turning Point USA’s Alex Clark took to her “Poplitics” IGTV show to go on [an almost 10-minute tirade]( against the artist, incorrectly claiming he has no Grammy Awards (he has two), calling his fans “jobless gays on Twitter,” and calling the shoes “100 percent Satanic” before telling Lil Nas X that “hell and the devil are completely real.” I am not foolish. I understand why a Black gay man bothers some Christians. (And why the video—in which Lil Nas X pole dances down to Hell and gives Satan a lap dance—really, really bothers them.) But I also saw something else. Montero is engaging with the Church’s symbols seriously. Most pop stars sell “sex” in their work in a way that rejects the Church completely. But Montero is asking to be part of its lineage. In many ways, Montero’s claim here is not a rejection of the Church or its value. It’s an invitation for Christians to reflect and ask questions about how they might align their faith with Christ’s message: love. Because yes, our love looks like this, conflicted by religion, pained by its oppression, and reactive to those who condemn us. It looks like this music video. “If your initial reaction is being offended, that’s totally understandable,” Matthew Vines, founder of [The Reformation Project](, tells me. “But I also encourage people to think more about why he thinks this—what does that say about the church? Because this is the message that so many queer people have gotten.” Montero himself made this exact point, [tweeting](: “i spent my entire teenage years hating myself because of the shit y’all preached would happen to me because i was gay. so i hope u are mad, stay mad, feel the same anger you teach us to have towards ourselves.” Vines has spent years walking the fine line between the type of conservative Christianity that Montero has brought out of the woodwork and LGBTQ+ affirming theology. And he understands the backlash. But he’s also serious about where the backlash is coming from. “It’s definitely possible to be LGBTQ and Christian,” Vines says over the phone. “The video is just a reminder of how far there still is to go before that message can even be heard and internalized by so many people because so many churches still are teaching a false dichotomy.” With the initial release, Montero released a [short note to his 14-year-old self](: “you see this is very scary for me, people will be angry, they will say i’m pushing an agenda. but the truth is, i am. the agenda to make people stay the fuck out of other people’s lives and stop dictating who they should be. sending you love from the future.” In his [breakdown of the track]( for Genius, he furthers that perspective: “Anything I do or say it’s me opening my mouth and a lot of people see it as me opening my mouth for so many people. And not because I’m Lil Nas X, but because of my identity itself too.” Built into his narrative from the get-go is no question as to why he’s doing it. It’s to tell his truth—or testimony, as we like to call it in Jesus circles. We Christians don’t get to disregard someone’s lived truth just because we don’t like it or we don’t like the story it tells. “There have been other artists who have brought forth some sort of imagery or depictions that have created a little bit of this,” explains Rev. Timoth Sylvia of Newman Congregational Church in Rhode Island, who went [semi-viral TikTok]( for his theological perspective on the track. “What I keep landing on is that the difference here is a Little Nas X is gay.” And he’s right. There is a lot of trauma in my childhood and my young adult life that stems from these two identities that were pitted against each other for no reason. Seeing Montero’s interpretation of his own journey with that white-heterosexual-Christian-based culture, personally, was powerful. The star gives credence to queer people who are looking for more than an invitation to “exist,” it gives us the tools to dismantle rhetorical and systematic oppression through humor, shock, and allegory. It can give queer people the language and the imagery to have conversations around why the ideas the church purports about queerness are painful, manipulative, and completely at odds with who Christ is. Montero pulls back the curtain for others like him, giving us the tools to claim our seat at Christ’s table. It’s the healing power of the church that Montero invites us queer folk into. “It’s as if folks are feeling that they’re seen,” says Rev. Sylvia. “That’s such an important element of the healing process, that someone has acknowledged my trauma, someone has acknowledged my pain. And they’re willing to sit with me in it.” —Sam Van Pykeren Did you enjoy this newsletter? Help us out by [forwarding]( it to a friend or sharing it on [Facebook]( and [Twitter](. [Mother Jones]( [Donate]( [Subscribe]( This message was sent to {EMAIL}. To change the messages you receive from us, you can [edit your email preferences]( or [unsubscribe from all mailings.]( For advertising opportunities see our online [media kit.]( Were you forwarded this email? [Sign up for Mother Jones' newsletters today.]( [www.MotherJones.com]( PO Box 8539, Big Sandy, TX 75755

Marketing emails from motherjones.com

View More
Sent On

09/11/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

05/11/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Sent On

27/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.