Newsletter Subject

Why is Ralph Nader yelling at me?

From

motherjones.com

Email Address

newsletters@motherjones.com

Sent On

Wed, Apr 17, 2024 07:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

The MoJo Daily newsletter, Monday through Friday. ? ? April 17, 2024 Hello there! I’m Clint

The MoJo Daily newsletter, Monday through Friday. [View in browser]( [Support our nonprofit journalism]( [Mother Jones Daily Newsletter](     April 17, 2024 Hello there! I’m Clint Hendler, a Mother Jones senior editor. According to Gallup, 63 percent of Americans like the idea of a new [political party](. I’m one! Unless you think our current system works swimmingly, it’s not hard to guess why. But for all the pent-up appetite, this year’s election is a perfect illustration of how American democracy is hostile to and unsafe for [third-party candidates and voters](. As much as I wish it weren’t the case as an occasional third-party voter, the fact is that our winner-takes-all system marginalizes outside candidates—or worse, sets them up as spoilers. Last week, the New York Times reported on GOP plans to help Green Party candidate Jill Stein, Cornel West, and RFK Jr. build their profiles or gain ballot access. Their logic: If voters back them over Biden, it will help Trump. In 2016, we know the Russian troll campaign drew from the same playbook to boost Stein on social media. With those three candidates already in the mix and a Libertarian contender on the way, opportunities for such dirty tricks abound. For our [May+June special issue]( on third parties, David Corn lays out those risks, which are especially high this year given Trump’s anti-democratic ambitions. But in designing this [package](, I wanted to look beyond November and acknowledge that the US’s hidebound two-party system is a unicorn among developed democracies, and that broad swaths of citizens don’t see their ideas reflected inside our system. So Mike Mechanic [nerded out on how]( reforms like ranked choice voting would foster more diverse politics. And I had a blast telling the country’s two-century-old but sometimes [overlooked history of outsider politics](. You can’t have this discussion without bringing up [Ralph Nader](, so Jacob Rosenberg got the 90-year-old on the phone for a testy [conversation]( on the limits of American democracy. Senior reporter Tim Murphy dove into [why the Libertarian Party](has failed to meet the MAGA moment by offering a credible right-leaning alternative. Finally, thousands in our online community, including newsletter readers like you, chimed in on our survey on third-party voting: You still can [here](! History shows that outside candidates will fade as Election Day nears with its high-stakes, Biden v. Trump contrast. But in a very close contest, this year, it may be voters who can’t stomach that choice who make [all the difference](. —Clint Hendler Advertisement [ADVOCATE, A New Graphic Memoir from Eddie Ahn]( [Top Story] [Top Story]( [Party Poppers]( Will third-party candidates hand the election to Trump? BY MOTHER JONES SPONSORED CONTENT BY PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE   ADVOCATE, A New Graphic Memoir from Eddie Ahn A moving graphic memoir following Eddie Ahn, an environmental justice lawyer and activist striving to serve diverse communities in San Francisco amidst environmental catastrophes, an accelerating tide of racial and economic inequality, burnout, and his family’s expectations. [Get Advocate here.]( [Trending] [Will RFK Jr. and other third-party candidates help doom democracy?]( BY DAVID CORN   [Ralph Nader would like to stop having to explain why the spoiler coverage is stupid]( BY JACOB ROSENBERG   [America's voting system is the worst, thumbs down]( BY MICHAEL MECHANIC   [The spectacular implosion of the Libertarian Party]( BY TIM MURPHY Advertisement [ADVOCATE, A New Graphic Memoir from Eddie Ahn]( [Special Feature] [Special Feature]( [Your Turn: Mother Jones readers sound off on voting third party]( "Why screw up the most important election in a century?" BY CLINT HENDLER MOTHER JONES MEMBERSHIP UPDATE   An important update on our finances We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals—and we can’t sustain coming up short on [donations]( month after month. It is [impossibly hard]( in the news business right now, and the [crisis]( facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. Neither is Mother Jones. Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and [joined forces]( with the Center for Investigative Reporting, which creates the amazing podcast and public radio show [Reveal]( and other investigative projects. It’s going to be hard making it all work, and we simply can’t afford to fall behind our fundraising targets month after month. If you can part with even just a few bucks, [please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today](. And thank you so much to everyone who recently has. We’re grateful. [Donate]( Did you enjoy this newsletter? Share it on [Facebook]( and [Twitter](. [Mother Jones]( [Donate]( [Donate Monthly]( [Subscribe]( This message was sent to {EMAIL}. To change the messages you receive from us, you can [edit your email preferences]( or [unsubscribe from all mailings.]( For advertising opportunities see our online [media kit.]( Were you forwarded this email? [Sign up for Mother Jones' newsletters today.]( [www.MotherJones.com]( PO Box 8539, Big Sandy, TX 75755

Marketing emails from motherjones.com

View More
Sent On

13/05/2024

Sent On

10/05/2024

Sent On

09/05/2024

Sent On

09/05/2024

Sent On

08/05/2024

Sent On

07/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.