Newsletter Subject

World Gold Council: Investment Update - Gold, an efficient hedge

From

morningstar.com

Email Address

morningstar@mailing.morningstar.com

Sent On

Fri, Nov 6, 2020 04:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

You are receiving this email as a registered member of Morningstar.com and have asked to receive fea

You are receiving this email as a registered member of Morningstar.com and have asked to receive features, products and services from third party companies. This is a paid advertisement from the sponsor. If you would like to change your e-mail preferences, see the bottom of this message for more information. Also, if you are unable to see the images, please click “Show Images and Enable Links” or right-click to download pictures. Many tail hedges work well during crises if timed appropriately, but are technically complex investments, and can be expensive to hold systematically. [World Gold Council]( Investment Update: Gold, an efficient hedge The benefits of certain portfolio hedges came into clear focus during the 2008-2009 financial crisis and did so again during the subsequent European sovereign debt crisis, the 2018 December stock market pullback and the most recent COVID-19 pandemic. Many tail hedges work well during crises if timed appropriately, but are technically complex investments, and can be expensive to hold systematically. Thus, it is important to consider different metrics for assessing the benefits and drawbacks of each hedge. [Our analysis]( shows that, historically, any of the hedging choices are better than a diversified hypothetical portfolio without hedging, but gold has historically been the overall optimal hedge over the long run when considering the collective portfolio metrics. (Table 1 below). This report examines: - volatility, credit, fixed income, and precious metal hedges - hypothetical portfolio: returns, volatility, risk-adjusted returns and drawdown - the benefits and drawbacks of the hedges - and the application to historical and recent market behaviour. Table 1: Performance of hedging strategies in an average pension fund portfolio over the past 20 years* Ranked (1= most optimal to 9 = least optimal) for each category and overall. *Performance between March 2000 and March 2020. The hypothetical portfolio is based on Willis Towers Watson Global Pension Assets Study 2019 and Global Alternatives Survey 2017 as described in the Appendix footnote 5. Performance is based on blended weights of the hedges ranging from 2.5% to 10% of the portfolio, proportionately reducing the rest of the portfolio by the initial weights. ‘Returns’: average of cumulative and average returns; ‘Volatility’: overall portfolio volatility; ‘Risk-adjusted returns’: average of the return on risk, Sharpe ratio and information ratio; ‘Max drawdown’: the most the portfolio lost during any trough. See the Appendix and footnote 4 for definitions of ‘VIX short-term futures’ ‘CDS IG’, ‘CDS HY’; and ‘TIPS’. Source: Bloomberg, World Gold Council [Download the full report]( Follow us... [Twitter]( [LinkedIn]( [Facebook]( [Gold]( Copyright © 2020 World Gold Council, All rights reserved. Our mailing address is: World Gold Council 15 Fetter LaneLondon, EC4A 1BW United Kingdom Read our [Privacy Notice](. This communication, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and is intended solely for the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the author and destroy this communication. World Gold Council, An Association is registered as an overseas company in England & Wales with UK establishment number BR012707. It is formed as a Verein in Switzerland with limited liability of its members and is registered with the Swiss Registre Du Commerce (identification number CH-660.0.534.987-6). WGC (UK) Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 07867682. About this E-mail to Morningstar.com Customers: To unsubscribe from future e-mail, [click here](. You may be asked to log in first. If you cannot remember your password, retrieve it by [clicking here](. All subscription changes will take effect within one business day. This message was sent by an automatic mail sending program. Do not reply to this e-mail address. Any messages sent to this address will be automatically deleted. If you have questions about Morningstar.com or your membership, send a note to joe@morningstar.com. ABOUT OUR PRIVACY POLICY Please [click here]( to learn about Morningstar's privacy policy. © Copyright 2020. Morningstar, Inc., 22 West Washington Chicago, Illinois, 60602. All rights reserved

Marketing emails from morningstar.com

View More
Sent On

26/05/2024

Sent On

25/05/2024

Sent On

23/05/2024

Sent On

22/05/2024

Sent On

22/05/2024

Sent On

20/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.