Newsletter Subject

I Was Warned... You Were Warned

From

moneymorninglive.com

Email Address

support@mb.moneymorninglive.com

Sent On

Wed, Oct 26, 2022 08:10 PM

Email Preheader Text

FRD, IPI, FKWL, FITB, RTX, ? Bull Market or Bear Market..."" just plain works! See How You Can Get

FRD, IPI, FKWL, FITB, RTX, [Image](   [ARCHIVES]( LIVE]( [Twitter]( [Youtube]( [Instagram]( [Tiktok]( [Discord]( [LinkedIn]( Bull Market or Bear Market..."[EXTREME MOMENTUM]( just plain works! See How You Can Get Up To[FIVE Potential]( Your Money or More"]( Every Week   October 26, 2022 Dear Reader Last night, my wife cleaned out a filing cabinet that we hadn’t touched since we first moved to Chicago in 2015. The cabinet had to go because of the mold damage to the guest room after a pipe burst sometime before Hurricane Ian hit. We discovered that upon our return home post Ian. In one folder was a large packet of articles I’d written for Modern Trader magazine, including the very first articles. Inside one of the final issues of Futures Magazine (before the name changed), I had two stories. The first was a piece about former Buffalo Bills quarterback E.J. Manuel, who sold a stake in his future expected income on a Sports Exchange (that was brilliant by him. He hasn’t been in the league since 2019)... The second was an interview with a U.S. Senator. I don’t want to say the person’s name just yet – because I know that you will read this quote with bias for or against this politician. It was 2014. Long before the European Central Bank fueled the global rush of bond purchases and rejected austerity. Long before QE 3. Long before QE 4 and the great COVID helicopter money escapade. One question and one answer really stand out looking back... The question was: What are your thoughts on plans by the Federal Reserve to taper stimulus plans and eventually raise interest rates? (Remember... this wouldn’t happen until 2018.) "The main thing is from a historic perspective we ought to ask the question: Are we proud of an agency that has lost 96% of the value of the thing the Fed is supposed to protect? Would that be a success or failure. Have we had more or less upheaval, greater or fewer panics or crashes since the Federal Reserve or before the Federal Reserve? There is an objective argument that we did have problems before the Federal Reserve, but we still continue to have problems with the Federal Reserve. The fundamental question about the Federal Reserve and monetary policy in general that we should ask is “How important is it that the market should decide prices?” If you ask most free-market economists, they’d say “Absolutely. The price of bread, the price of computers, the price of labor, all that should be free and open to the marketplace.” However, their one inconsistency is they think interest rates should be set by government. It’s amazing that so many people who favor free markets and free pricing supports a completely centralized, completely arbitrary setting of the price of money. This led to the great housing bubble and the great housing crash. In a normal marketplace, as things began to heat up and you had more builders and more people borrowing money, as the demand rose for money, so would the price in the form of interest rates. The rising price of money would slow down the economy, and you’d have a reversal. But you wouldn’t get to a point where you reached insane levels of housing prices, where people were doubling and tripling their house’s price every year or two. This craziness of that doesn’t happen under capitalism. It doesn’t happen under a free-pricing mechanism. The debate we ought to have in this country is” Should the price of money be arbitrarily decided by one central authority? Or should the price of money be decided by a marketplace?” It’s a very important question – and one that we didn’t ask then, and we still haven’t asked now. If we had asked this question – would we have experienced this problem with inflation? Would we have experienced this market downturn this year? And will we continue to operate in an environment – without reform – that has fueled FOUR massive financial downturns in the last 20 years? 2001-02, 2008, 2020, and 2022. And other sharp reversals like we had in 2018. The quote – by the way – is from Senator Rand Paul. Talk Soon, [Garrett {NAME}]( Did you miss the show? No worries, we’ve got you covered.   "I’m going to make you an offer you can’t refuse." REPORTS   [Welcome to Momentum]( [Trading Momentum]( [Trading Fundamentals]( [Trading the Fed]( [Trading Insiders]( WATCH REPLAYS   [Watch the Show!]( [Sneak A Peak Inside the World's Biggest Trade](   You are receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}, as part of your subscription to Midday Momentum. To remove your email from this list: [unsubscribe here]( Please do not reply to this email as this address is not monitored. To cancel, or for any other questions or requests, please contact our Customer Service team: Online: [Customer Service Form]( Phone: 888-384-8339 (North America) 443-353-4519 (International) Mail: Midday Momentum | Attn: Member Services | 1125 N Charles Street | Baltimore, MD 21201 Fax: 410-622-3050 Our Customer Service team is available Monday ­ Friday between 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM ET. © 2022 Money Map Press. All Rights Reserved. Nothing in this email should be considered personalized financial advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. This Newsletter may only be used pursuant to the subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of: Money Map Press. 1125 N Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. [Website]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms & Conditions](

Marketing emails from moneymorninglive.com

View More
Sent On

31/12/2023

Sent On

31/12/2023

Sent On

30/12/2023

Sent On

30/12/2023

Sent On

29/12/2023

Sent On

29/12/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.