Newsletter Subject

This Toxic Retirement Timebomb Is Ready to Blow

From

moneyandmarkets.com

Email Address

info@mb.moneyandmarkets.com

Sent On

Wed, Feb 15, 2023 12:04 PM

Email Preheader Text

Here’s one way you can protect your nest egg. Dear Loyal Reader, If you?re like most investor

Here’s one way you can protect your nest egg. [Turn Your Images On] Managing Editor’s note: The Money & Markets team is away on a company retreat as we aim to serve you better with everything we’re doing, including the Stock Power Daily. But that doesn’t mean you’ll miss out on hearing from us throughout the rest of the week. Today, our chief investment strategist, Adam O’Dell, is dropping by with a recent piece he wrote for The Banyan Edge. It’s all about how certain detrimental assets were added to your retirement portfolio after the financial crisis — and what you can do about it. Read on… — Chad [The Toxic Retirement Timebomb You Never Asked For]( [Turn Your Images On] [Adam O'Dell, Chief Investment Strategist]( Dear Loyal Reader, If you’re like most investors I know, you probably hold the following beliefs, even if subconsciously: - Buying stocks is noble because it funds innovation, growth and prosperity, and… - “Shorting” stocks is evil. I agree with #1 … but am here today to dispute the misconception in #2. Look, I get why “shorting” stocks appears less than noble. The optics of some high-powered Wall Street trader taking home billions in profits while grandma loses 50% of her 401(k)… It feels icky. But it’s not the whole story. Consider this… In 2015, Harvard Law grad and Wall Street insider Steve Eisman found himself the subject of a lead role in the blockbuster film The Big Short. If you saw the movie, you might’ve got an icky feeling as you watch Steve Eisman rake it in during the 2008 great financial crisis — which, indeed, chopped 50% off the value of grandma’s retirement savings. Looking deeper, though, you’ll learn that Steve didn’t cause the great financial crisis. (Short sellers rarely, if ever, cause stocks to crash.) He was, in fact, trying to expose the ones that did! See, in January 2007, Steve Eisman was invited to meet with a man named Wing Chau. Chau was prominently involved in packaging subprime mortgage debt into collateralized debt obligations (aka “CDOs”). Essentially, Chau was able to take a bunch of high-risk subprime mortgage debt and package them into CDOs, which somehow were slapped with “low risk” labels by trusted ratings agencies like Moody’s. Then he sold them by the billions to unsuspecting investors. And these unsuspecting investors were not greedy hedge funds for which you’d have little sympathy. Many were pension funds that managed millions of Americans’ retirements … including “grandma’s.” Long story short, after meeting with Chau and hearing what he was doing … Steve called the CDOs “dog crap” and vowed to shortthem. The rest is history. Steve Eisman and a small handful of others — John Paulson, Michael Burry and James Mai — all shorted the toxic CDOs that Wing had been pedaling as “safe” investments. Soon the façade of those “safe” investments crumbled … the short sellers made billions of dollars … and the entire U.S. financial system — the system that allowed Wing and other bad actors to push toxic investments into grandma’s retirement fund — came under intense scrutiny. That, my friends, is why you should be able to see Steve Eisman and his short seller colleagues as the heroes of this story … not the “evil” villains that short sellers are lazily portrayed to be. These short sellers catalyzed one of the most impactful Wall Street reforms of the 21st century. Unfortunately, 15 years on from the great financial crisis, the system has found a workaround. Once again, toxic assets have made their way into the retirement funds of everyday Americans — whether they like it or not. I can confirm with 99% certainty that you’re exposed to assets like these right now. Worse, there’s almost nothing you can do to avoid it. However, there is something you can do to fight back. But before I tell you that, we have to understand how Wall Street changed after 2008, and why that still can’t protect us from this problem. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Turn Your Images On]( [Target 2,000% Gains or More in the Next 180 Days]( Adam O’Dell recently revealed that 2,006 stocks could be poised for a massive correction. And his system can help find the best opportunities to profit as all of this unfolds. [Go here to reserve your spot now.]( --------------------------------------------------------------- The Dodd-Frank Act The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was the U.S. Congress’ answer to Wall Street’s greed and reckless behavior. It was meant to protect grandma from the likes of Wing Chau and everyone else who was willing to sell “dog crap” to unsuspecting investors. If it worked, it would prevent a systemic calamity like the great financial crisis from ever happening again. And, for the most part, it seems to be working. Yes, there are criticisms of Dodd-Frank. Some argue it’s too strict and makes it more difficult for U.S. financial institutions to be competitive. But few will argue the U.S. financial system is less safe than it was in 2007. Most agree it’s far, far safer. For instance, Steve Eisman himself recently spoke on the state of the U.S. banking system in 2023, relative to how it looked in 2007. Back then, the major U.S. banks were highly levered. That means they borrowed a lot of money to invest and didn’t have nearly enough capital to cover themselves in case of emergency. On average, banks were levered between 30-to-1 and 40-to-1. Now, thanks in large part to Dodd-Frank reforms, they’re back down into the 10-to-1 range. I like how Eisman put these numbers into context. He said: “These are just numbers … a better way to think about it is: If you’re levered 30-to-1 or 40-to-1, all it takes to destroy you is a ‘pebble.’When you’re only levered 10-to-1 … it would take a meteor.”  So, think about all this for a minute… Here in 2023, we’re muddling through a bear market in stocks and bonds … we’re facing a 90%-odds recession … and inflation is throwing a curve ball we haven’t seen in over 40 years. My point is, it’s by no means an easy environment to be an investor. But, it could be worse. We could be questioning the toxicity and fragility of the entire U.S. financial system like we were in 2008. Yet, we aren’t, thanks to Dodd-Frank and those misunderstood short sellers who “called foul” on one of the most unjust and unsustainable situations in modern financial history. For that, we should all be thankful! But unfortunately, I see a similar scenario playing out right now… Is History Repeating Itself? One of the saddest parts of the 2008 great financial crisis was how those toxic CDOs were more or less forced into grandma’s retirement portfolio. And while I realize saying so will be controversial, I’m concerned the very same thing is happening today, with a single stock that I’m willing to bet 100% of grandmas — and you — already own. Do you own anything that tracks the S&P 500? A mutual fund, exchange-traded fund or even a “target-date” fund through your 401(k) provider? If you answered “yes,” then you’re exposed to the company I’m referring to. The committee that decides which stocks are to be included in the S&P 500 added this company to the index in 2020, in a move that’s been called “controversial” by many. In short, the stock was (and still is) grossly overvalued. It traded at a price-to-earnings ratio more than 20 times the S&P 500’s the month before it was added to the index. I don’t know about you, but to me that sounds about as reckless as the ratings agencies slapping “low risk” labels on toxic mortgage CDOs in 2007! At any rate, because of that nosebleed valuation, the stock instantly became a top 10 holding for the index. And whether you or grandma realized or agreed to it … you began owning shares of this company from December 2020 onward — that is, assuming you have any of your money in an S&P 500 fund. You must realize, more than $7 trillion worth of retirement savings is tied to the S&P 500 Index. That’s a ton of money. And a ton of losses for unsuspecting investors, considering the stock has already fallen in half from its highs! That of course means that the “nosebleed” valuations this stock carried with it have come down some since its addition to the S&P 500 Index. Yet my analysis shows the stock is still between five and seven times more expensive than its peers — a valuation gap that I’m convinced will close this year as the stock tumbles lower still. As you can probably tell, I’ve done a lot of research and due diligence on this company. And you can also likely tell that I’m targeting it for [a big short of my own](. In fact, my team and I have put together a presentation that just premiered. I call it [“The Next Big Short”]( because the amount of money at stake actually exceeds the size of the CDO market in 2007. Thankfully, I believe the damage won’t have the same “systemic” impact CDOs had during the great financial crisis. But considering this stock is one of the largest holdings in all S&P 500 funds, I at least feel obligated to warn you of this situation. Already a number of successful Wall Street “short sellers” are betting against this stock, as are my subscribers. Whether or not you still believe shorting a stock is “evil,” the recommendation I’ll share next Tuesday could help you hedge the exposure you likely have to this grossly overpriced stock. You do not have to fall victim to Wall Street’s latest scheme. There are sensible ways to profit as stocks like this unwind. Right now, I’m using such a method to make even bigger percentage gains than the short sellers did in 2008 … with none of the unlimited risk that comes with shorting stocks. And if making a risk-limited trade that could net you a gain of 20-times your initial investment sounds appealing to you … [watching my Next Big Short presentation is a must](. To good profits, Adam O’Dell Chief Investment Strategist, Money and Markets --------------------------------------------------------------- Check Out the Latest From Stock Power Daily: - [1 “HIGH-RISK” EV MANUFACTURER CAN’T COMPETE]( - [DON’T GET TRAPPED WITH THIS CRUISE LINER STOCK]( - [FAKER OR MONEYMAKER? ROBLOX STOCK DEEP DIVE]( Privacy Policy The Money & Markets, P.O. Box 8378, Delray Beach, FL 33482. To ensure that you receive future issues of Money & Markets, please add info@mb.moneyandmarkets.com to your address book or [whitelist]( within your spam settings. For customer service questions or issues, please contact us for assistance. The mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so please do not reply. Your feedback is very important to us so if you would like to contact us with a question or comment, please click here: [( Legal Notice: This work is based on what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors and you should not base investment decisions solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility. Nothing herein should be considered personalized investment advice. Although our employees may answer general customer service questions, they are not licensed to address your particular investment situation. Our track record is based on hypothetical results and may not reflect the same results as actual trades. Likewise, past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Certain investments carry large potential rewards but also large potential risk. Don't trade in these markets with money you can't afford to lose. Money & Markets permits editors of a publication to recommend a security to subscribers that they own themselves. However, in no circumstance may an editor sell a security before our subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. Any exit after a buy recommendation is made and prior to issuing a sell notification is forbidden. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. (c) 2023 Money & Markets, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and treaties. This Newsletter may only be used pursuant to the subscription agreement. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, (electronic or otherwise) in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Money & Markets. P.O. Box 8378, Delray Beach, FL 33482. (TEL: 800-684-8471) Remove your email from this list: [Click here to Unsubscribe](

EDM Keywords (259)

year wrote worse worked workaround work wing willing whole whether way watching warn vowed value using us unsubscribe unjust unfortunately understand type turn treaties traded trade tracks toxicity ton today time tied throwing think thing thanks thankful tell team targeting takes take system subscribers subject strict story stocks stock still steve state spot sounds something somehow sold slapped size since shortthem shorted short serve seen seems see security saw said right results rest reserve research reply reflect referring recommendation recommend reckless ready read rate questioning question publication protect prosperity profits profit prior price presentation premiered poised point please peers pedaling pebble part package otherwise optics ones one numbers number note none noble must muddling movie move month monitored money miss misconception minute might method meteor meeting meet meant means mean may markets many making makes made lot losses looked likes likely like licensed levered length learned learn latest know issuing invited investors investor invest inflation index including included important images however highs heroes hedge hearing half guarantee greed grandmas grandma got get gain friends fragility found forbidden five feedback fact facing exposure exposed expose expensive exit evil everything even ensure emergency email dropping done dollars dispute difficult destroy dell decides damage criticisms crash cover could convinced controversial context considering confirm concerned competitive compete company committee comes come close chau chad cdos cause case call bunch borrowed bonds blow billions betting better believe based banks back away avoid assuming assistance argue anything amount already aim agreed agree afford advised address addition added adam able 40 30 2023 2020 2008 2007 10

Marketing emails from moneyandmarkets.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.