Newsletter Subject

Are We on a Collision Course with China?

From

mauldineconomics.com

Email Address

subscribers@mauldineconomics.com

Sent On

Fri, Jan 19, 2024 03:15 PM

Email Preheader Text

The short answer is “yes” . My goal with all the work I’ve done with John over the ye

The short answer is “yes” [Read Online]( [Global Macro Update] [Global Macro Update] Are We on a Collision Course with China? By Ed D'Agostino | January 19, 2024 [Ed D'Agostino] Before we get to this week’s interview, I want to share a warm thank you to everyone who watched my [2024 market outlook briefing](. My goal with all the work I’ve done with John over the years, and with the work I’m doing with the Macro Team today, is to help you navigate a world in flux. We are at the onset of a shift in the markets. In the years ahead, investors won’t be able to rely on broad-based ETFs to deliver great returns. A different approach is in order, and that is what I’ve spent the past years developing. As I’ve mentioned before, my team and I use themes to guide our investment research. This allows us to focus on investments that will benefit from the biggest shifts and megatrends. One of those themes, as I mentioned in my market briefing ([click here]( to watch if you missed it) is the multipolar world. A common narrative I hear is that China is rising while the US declines. It’s a tidy story, but the reality is more complex. A range of countries and regions, including China, are growing their economic, military, and social power, while the US continues to lead the world in nearly every way that matters. This theme was the impetus behind my latest Global Macro Update interview with Elbridge Colby. Colby served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy and Force Development from 2017 to 2018. He’s a co-founder of the Marathon Initiative, a foreign policy think tank, and the author of The Strategy of Denial: American Defense in an Age of Great Power Conflict. We covered so much ground that I had to break this interview into two parts. In part one, which you’ll see today, I asked Colby if we are on a collision course with China. He said “yes.” Taiwan is one potential near-term war catalyst. Most Americans have a hard time grasping the tension over Taiwan. Why should the US care about an island right off China’s mainland that’s smaller than our biggest national park? Sure, it makes all those semiconductors, but is that worth going to war over (especially now that we’re reshoring more chip manufacturing)? Colby says the heart of the issue here isn’t Taiwan, but China’s ambitions to dominate the Eastern Hemisphere, both economically and militarily… and then use that dominance to challenge the US from a position of even greater strength. Take a look at this chart showing China’s military spending. It’s going up, up, up. This makes sense when you consider that China feels threatened by the US, as Colby says. Taiwan has increased its military spending, which you can see in the next chart. Yet it still spends less on defense as a percentage of GDP (2.6%) than the US (3.1%). Taiwan is a wealthy, sophisticated country. If it wants to retain its quasi-independence—and recent elections there indicate it does—it can afford to bulk up on its own defense a lot more. Colby and I agree that your average American would have a hard time helping a country that isn’t doing everything it can to help itself. In the interview, you will also hear why the US can no longer afford to act as the world’s policeman, along with other ways tensions with China could escalate in the near term. You can watch my full interview with Elbridge Colby by clicking the image above. A full transcript of our conversation is available [here](. Best regards, [Ed D'Agostino] [Ed D'Agostino] Ed D'Agostino Publisher & COO Mauldin Economics You can follow me here: - [LinkedIn]( - Or [download the new Mauldin Economics app]( and get in on the discussion Suggested Reading... [A Muddle-Through Year](  [Stream free here]( Don't let friends miss this timely insight— share it with your network now. Share Your Thoughts on This Article [Post a Comment]( Did someone forward this letter to you? [Click here to get]( Global Macro Update in your inbox every Friday. [Read important disclosures here.]( YOUR USE OF THESE MATERIALS IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF THESE DISCLOSURES. --------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent as part of your subscription to Global Macro Update. [To update your email preferences click here.]( Mauldin Economics | 1417 Sadler Road, PMB 415 | Fernandina Beach, FL 32034 Copyright © 2024 Mauldin Economics. All Rights Reserved.

Marketing emails from mauldineconomics.com

View More
Sent On

28/05/2024

Sent On

26/05/2024

Sent On

24/05/2024

Sent On

23/05/2024

Sent On

21/05/2024

Sent On

17/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.