Newsletter Subject

It’s a stock (and niche ETF!) picker’s market

From

mauldineconomics.com

Email Address

subscribers@mauldineconomics.com

Sent On

Mon, Jan 15, 2024 03:42 PM

Email Preheader Text

The case for concentration It's a stock picker's market By Ed D'Agostino | January 15, 2024 2023 was

The case for concentration [Read Online]( [Global Macro Update] [Global Macro Update] It's a stock (and niche ETF!) picker's market By Ed D'Agostino | January 15, 2024 [Ed D'Agostino] 2023 was a great year for the stock market. But it was an epic year for a handful of select stocks. The “magnificent seven,” Amazon, Alphabet, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla, soared 112% (equally weighting each). They outperformed both the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), which is weighted by market cap, and the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP), which weights each stock equally. This illustrates the benefit of holding the right stocks, as you can see in the chart below. Concentration can lead to outperformance, if you get the big idea right. That’s easier said than done. To get the big idea right, I believe you should invest in and around dominant changes, megatrends, or what I call themes. Get the most important themes right and you have a framework for understanding the world and how to invest in it. That framework will help you avoid second guessing, wondering if you’re in the right investments (and perhaps exiting at the wrong time). It will also help you avoid the wrong stocks. For example, on November 3, I noted that global shipping company Maersk’s 10% jobs cut was predictable. My research team and I had been discussing a downturn in container shipping for months, due to reshoring and nearshoring. If more products are made in North America, fewer products will be shipped this way from China. This is a durable trend. Shippers are collateral damage. Source: [@EdDAgostino]( Oddly, one way to gain concentrated exposure to big trends is through niche ETFs. I say “oddly” because, while many people consider ETFs great diversification tools, oftentimes they are not. Even well-known ETFs have a lot more single-stock concentration than you’d anticipate. Take a look at the next chart, which shows the heaviest-weighted stock within popular ETFs. Did you know the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE), which has 23 holdings, has a 22.68% weighting to Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM)? That’s fine, as long as you want that level of concentration. But if for some reason you’re bullish on energy, yet bearish on Exxon, this ETF won’t serve your needs. The Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) is even more skewed. XLK has 64 holdings, but two stocks, Microsoft (MSFT) and Apple (AAPL), comprise 44% of it. Moving forward, I believe niche ETFs (much more narrowly focused than the ones above), along with individual stocks set to benefit from dominant themes, will outperform both the market and broad-based ETFs, especially when you take volatility into account. There’s an ETF for almost any idea you can think of. Are you bullish on Polish stocks? Check out the iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL). Bullish on Singapore? Check out the iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS). How about robotics and automation? Look into the Robo Global Robotics and Automation Index ETF (ROBO). Note: These are not recommendations, just examples. I like niche ETFs, but they have an important similarity to individual stocks. You need to know what you’re buying. Take a look under the hood. It’s a stock (and niche ETF!) picker’s market, driven by macro trends. To invest accordingly, you’ll need rigorous “top-down” research (getting the themes right) combined with “bottom-up” equity analysis (smart stock picking). That’s what I’ve been working on with an elite group within Mauldin Economics for over a year. I look forward to sharing more about our efforts and how we view the markets in 2024. I’ll have all the details for you on Wednesday. I hope you’ll join me. Best regards, [Ed D'Agostino] [Ed D'Agostino] Ed D'Agostino Publisher & COO Mauldin Economics Don't let friends miss this timely insight— share it with your network now. Share Your Thoughts on This Article [Post a Comment]( Did someone forward this letter to you? [Click here to get]( Global Macro Update in your inbox every Friday. [Read important disclosures here.]( YOUR USE OF THESE MATERIALS IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF THESE DISCLOSURES. --------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent as part of your subscription to Global Macro Update. [To update your email preferences click here.]( Mauldin Economics | 1417 Sadler Road, PMB 415 | Fernandina Beach, FL 32034 Copyright © 2024 Mauldin Economics. All Rights Reserved.

Marketing emails from mauldineconomics.com

View More
Sent On

28/05/2024

Sent On

26/05/2024

Sent On

24/05/2024

Sent On

23/05/2024

Sent On

21/05/2024

Sent On

17/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.