Newsletter Subject

The Truth Behind the CO2 Crisis... and the Smart Way to Play It

From

mauldineconomics.com

Email Address

subscribers@mauldineconomics.com

Sent On

Mon, Mar 6, 2023 03:16 PM

Email Preheader Text

The solution to solving the global carbon emissions “crisis” is simple. Mar 6, 2023 The

The solution to solving the global carbon emissions “crisis” is simple. [Read this article on our website.]( [Smart Money Monday]  Mar 6, 2023 The Truth Behind the CO2 Crisis... and the Smart Way to Play It “Going green” means a lot of things to different people. But one metric often determines success or failure in this effort… Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Despite all the noise around solar panels, electric vehicles, and ESG scores, there is only one way to materially solve the issue of growing CO2 emissions. Sadly, no one seems to talk about it. But the solution is simple… China’s Soaring CO2 Emissions First, we must look at the problem. And that problem is China. Since entering the World Trade Organization in 2001, China’s CO2 emissions have risen from 4 billion tons to nearly 12 billion tons. Over that same time frame, US CO2 emissions are down nearly 1 billion tons to 5 billion in total. Sure, China has rapidly grown over that time frame. But so have its CO2 emissions. CO2 emissions come from a variety of sources. One of the major sources is manufacturing. For now, China is the factory of the world. So, it’s understandable that as its production capacity increases, so too does CO2. But increasing by 300%? It’s a tough reality to accept, but China is simply not an environmentally friendly place to make things. It isn’t blessed with natural resources like the US and, based on its surging CO2 emissions, likely isn’t using modern technology in the same way. Plus, I doubt China is abiding by reasonable environmental standards in its production processes. A Megatrend Worth Following Onshoring, or bringing production back to the US, is one of the top megatrends we’re following closely at Smart Money Monday. Its close cousin, nearshoring, is also worth following. Nearshoring simply means moving production back to North America. If global leaders are serious about reducing global carbon emissions, there is only one “problem child” in the equation: China. To reduce global carbon emissions, the world should accept that manufacturing—or high-CO2-emitting processes—should be handled in areas of the world that are able to produce them without flooding the atmosphere with CO2. That location is the US. Over the coming years, more and more leaders will accept this reality. Winners in Onshoring To solve the problem of global CO2 emissions, more manufacturing needs to come back to the US, which I anticipate will happen. So, how should you play it? - I’ve written about one clear winner here: vertically integrated steel manufacturer Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF). Cliffs was one of my top ideas for 2022, and it continues to be one of my favorite ideas for 2023. CEO Lourenco Goncalves has shrewdly grown Cliffs into a steel behemoth through smart capital allocation decisions and well-timed acquisitions. The company benefits from its access to iron ore in the United States. That’s through its control of the iron ore mines in Minnesota—it owns them outright. All that iron ore gets funneled into its steel manufacturing facilities. Cliffs trades at a reasonable 10X next year’s earnings estimates. It’s paying down debt and generating a ton of free cash flow. And with hot-rolled steel prices up 67% so far this year, I suspect the analyst earnings estimates are low—meaning there’s more upside here. - Another name to benefit from the onshoring megatrend is Class I railroad CSX Corp. (CSX). Despite Norfolk Southern’s (NSC) ugly derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, the rails aren’t going anywhere. Yes, regulation might increase. But the rails are here to stay—they are critical pieces of infrastructure. Onshoring means an increase in goods transportation. And one cost-efficient way to do that is on CSX’s railroad. CSX trades for 16X this year’s earnings estimates. That’s a reasonable multiple to pay for what is effectively a duopoly on the eastern seaboard—i.e., between Norfolk Southern and CSX. It’s simple: The US is efficient—and green—when it comes to manufacturing. So, if you want to get long green energy, it’s best to own critical manufacturing companies. Not faddish ideas such as solar farms, faux-meat companies, or electric car companies. Own businesses that make things that trade for reasonable valuations and have long-term upside as manufacturing and production come back to the US. Thanks for reading, [Thompson Clark] —Thompson Clark Editor, Smart Money Monday Suggested Reading... [The Indexing Bomb](  [Deficits Forever]( [Thompson Clark]Thompson Clark is a small-cap expert and value-focused investor with nearly a decade of experience in financial publishing. Thompson graduated from the Goizueta Business School at Emory University in 2010 with a focus in finance and accounting. He lives in North Carolina. He is the editor of Mauldin Economics’ free research service, [Smart Money Monday](. Don't let friends miss this timely insight— share it with your network now. [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [LinkedIn]( Share Your Thoughts on This Article [Post a Comment]( [Read important disclosures here.]( YOUR USE OF THESE MATERIALS IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF THESE DISCLOSURES.  This email was sent as part of your subscription to Smart Money Monday. [To update your email preferences click here.]( Mauldin Economics, LLC | [PO Box 192495 | Dallas, TX 75219](#) Copyright © 2023 Mauldin Economics. All Rights Reserved.

Marketing emails from mauldineconomics.com

View More
Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

01/10/2024

Sent On

27/09/2024

Sent On

20/09/2024

Sent On

13/09/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.