Newsletter Subject

Smart Money Monday - “Have We Reached the Bottom Yet?”

From

mauldineconomics.com

Email Address

subscribers@mauldineconomics.com

Sent On

Mon, Aug 8, 2022 02:12 PM

Email Preheader Text

Look to the first dot-com bubble Aug 8, 2022 "Have We Reached the Bottom Yet?" Mania. It’s h

Look to the first dot-com bubble [Read this article on our website.]( [Smart Money Monday]  Aug 8, 2022 "Have We Reached the Bottom Yet?" Mania. It’s hard to recognize when you’re in it. But that’s what the Covid-era buying frenzy was. A mania. You might even call it the second coming of the dot-com bubble. Investors bid up profitless tech companies to nonsensical valuations. IPO volumes went through the roof. And JPEG files branded as “non-fungible tokens” sold for millions of dollars. This all culminated in a 108% rise in the stock market over 22 months. Now, after peaking at the start of the year, the market has dropped 13.3%. And people keep asking me, “Have we reached the bottom yet?” - The first dot-com bubble provides a useful roadmap for answering that question. As you might recall, the Nasdaq rose 320% from April 1997 to its peak in March 2000. Then it started tumbling. Over the next 18 months, the Nasdaq fell 72%, finally bottoming in September 2001. This go-round, the Nasdaq peaked in December 2021. And it’s dropped 22% since. For this to be a 1:1 parallel, the Nasdaq would have to fall another 50% and take another year to bottom. - But the Nasdaq isn’t the best indicator for this bubble and bust. During the first dot-com bubble, the Nasdaq’s top 10 were all tech and telecommunications companies, like Microsoft (MSFT), Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO), and QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). It also included a young, dreamy-eyed Yahoo!, Sun Microsystems (later gobbled up by Oracle), and WorldCom (which imploded in scandal). Tech still dominates the Nasdaq’s top 10. But most of these companies are mature now, like Microsoft, Apple Inc (AAPL), and Amazon (AMZN). It also includes consumer staples giant PepsiCo Inc (PEP) and retail behemoth Costco Wholesale Corp (COST). Pepsi and Costco aren’t going anywhere. And at around 25–35 times forward earnings, they’re not trading at absurd valuations. "Mauldin Economics’ #1 Letter for 2022:" Learn how to secure steady 8%–13% dividends in your portfolio today. [Click here for the full details.]( - There’s a better gauge of how much froth is left in the market… The ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). ARKK is a basket of hyper-growth, hyper-speculative stocks managed by long-time fund manager Cathie Wood. The fund reached an all-time high of $156 per share in February 2021. Now it’s trading for $50, or about 67% below its peak. The key here is that ARKK holds companies with a lot in common to the Nasdaq’s top 10 during the dot-com era. Many, if not all of these companies, trade at incredibly steep valuations, just like the Nasdaq in 1999. [Tesla (TSLA), which I’ve written about before,]( is ARKK’s top position. It’s trading for over 100 times earnings per share. And that’s after a 25% fall from its November 2021 high. This valuation still makes no sense. Cisco (CSCO) was in a similar position during the dot-com bubble. It peaked at over $70 per share in March 2000. At that point, it was trading for over 150 times its 1999 earnings per share. Or look at another present-day ARKK name, Roku (ROKU). This TV streaming company is ARKK’s number two position. At its peak of over $470 last July, Roku traded for well over 20 times sales and 400 times earnings per share. The dot-com parallel here is QUALCOMM. Around its peak in 2000, it was trading for over 200 times earnings. I could go on. Point is, valuations for the dot-com era Nasdaq looked just like the valuations for ARKK names at their peak. Even after the massive pullback, some of the ARKK names still look quite frothy. Tesla, again, is just one example. I wouldn’t own ARKK here. However, the fund is a useful indicator for predicting the bottom of this bear market. Given its historic parallels to the dot-com era Nasdaq and its big drop over the past 18 months, I’d say we’re closer to the bottom than the top. Thanks for reading, [Thompson Clark] —Thompson Clark Editor, Smart Money Monday Suggested Reading... [Why Buffett’s Going “All In” in 2022](  [A Weird Recession]( [Thompson Clark]Thompson Clark is a small-cap expert and value-focused investor with nearly a decade of experience in financial publishing. Thompson graduated from the Goizueta Business School at Emory University in 2010 with a focus in finance and accounting. He lives in North Carolina. He is the editor of Mauldin Economics’ free research service, [Smart Money Monday]( . Don't let friends miss this timely insight— share it with your network now. [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Email]( Share Your Thoughts on This Article [Post a Comment]( [Read important disclosures here.]( YOUR USE OF THESE MATERIALS IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF THESE DISCLOSURES.  This email was sent as part of your subscription to Smart Money Monday . [To update your email preferences click here.]( Mauldin Economics | [1417 Sadler Road, PMB 415 | Fernandina Beach, FL 32034](#) Copyright © 2022 Mauldin Economics. All Rights Reserved.

Marketing emails from mauldineconomics.com

View More
Sent On

28/05/2024

Sent On

26/05/2024

Sent On

24/05/2024

Sent On

23/05/2024

Sent On

21/05/2024

Sent On

17/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.