Newsletter Subject

Most Investors Are Under Threat from This Left-Wing Policy—Here’s How to Protect Yourself

From

mauldineconomics.com

Email Address

subscribers@mauldineconomics.com

Sent On

Sat, Oct 26, 2019 12:22 PM

Email Preheader Text

Rethinking government funding --------------------------------------------------------------- Most I

Rethinking government funding [The Weekly Profit] [The Weekly Profit] --------------------------------------------------------------- Most Investors Are Under Threat from This Left-Wing Policy—Here’s How to Protect Yourself Bernie is back. Yes, Bernie Sanders—the self-described socialist—has tossed his hat back into the race for president. This time the senator from Vermont is getting much more support. In fact, Bernie raised a record $6 million from more than 225,000 donors within a day. But he is not the only Democratic candidate gaining momentum. Senators Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren raised a combined $2 million in the first day of their campaign. In all, the Democrats have a serious shot at the presidency. And these three leading Democratic presidential candidates pose a serious risk to your portfolio. Here’s why. All the Democratic Candidates Have One Thing in Common All three Democratic candidates have endorsed a policy known as the Green New Deal. The bill’s aim is to cut carbon emissions down to near zero by radically reforming the US economy. It also includes expensive social programs such as a federal job guarantee, free college, and universal healthcare. The plan is estimated to cost $6.6 trillion per year. That’s three times more than the federal government collects in tax revenue. It’s also larger than the entire $4.4-trillion federal budget for 2019. So how will all these new programs be paid for? A Radical Re-Thinking of Government Funding The Democrats are tossing around an idea known as Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). MMT is an economic theory that states a government can print money and spend as much as its needs. This way you don’t need to raise tax revenue or cut spending to fund government programs. So if the US government wants to spend $6.6 trillion per year on the Green New Deal, they can print $6.6 trillion just like that. Stephanie Kelton is one of MMT’s top advocates. No surprise she is also the chief economic adviser for Bernie Sanders. Kelton went so far as to say that, “We must give up our obsession with trying to ‘pay for’ everything with new revenue or spending cuts.” This is a major re-thinking of how governments are funded. But MMT poses one big problem, which even MMT proponents agree on. This policy could create massive inflation. Bracing Yourself for Massive Inflation If you print more money that chases around the same amount of goods, inflation will occur. It’s common sense. If the Democrats implemented MMT, they would print $6.6 trillion per year for the Green New Deal alone. That’s more than the entire US national budget! Such extreme measures are more likely than you might think. There’s no other way to fund the Green New Deal. Meanwhile, the Democrats seem to be bent on implementing it at any cost. That’s why the inflation risk is real. And now is a perfect time to take precautions. Before I continue, let me make it clear: I’m not a gold bug. My goal is to find safe yet profitable dividend stocks for my readers. The data shows that gold stocks now offer a compelling value. They are also one of the best time-tested assets to hold in times of high inflation. For instance, when inflation was in the double digits in the 1970s, gold took off: But while many investors pour into gold miners, I buy a different kind of gold stock that offers better returns with lower volatility. A Little-Known Breed of Gold Stock That Offers More Upside at No Additional Risk These stocks are known as gold streaming companies. Here’s how the streaming business model works in a nutshell. (You can find a more in-depth explanation of how these companies work [here](.) The gold streamer provides money to mining companies and becomes a silent partner. In return, it receives the right to buy metals from the miner’s future production at an agreed price. That’s good for a couple of reasons. First is unlimited upside. When gold prices rise, the streaming company still pays a set price. The company reaps higher profits and so do its shareholders. Second is limited downside. The streaming company is not on the hook for any additional costs. It is immune to the variable costs and risks associated with running a mine. And data confirms it’s a winning business model. When stocks sold off in late 2018, gold performed well. But it’s been no match for gold streaming companies. Take a look at this chart: Since October 1, 2018, the S&P 500 is down 4.9%. Gold is up a modest 11.1%. But my favorite gold streaming company is up 30.1%. That’s more than twice the return from gold, while assuming less risk. My Investment Recommendation: Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) is my favorite gold streaming company for a few reasons. The company has one of the most diversified streaming portfolios. This insulates the company from downtime in any single stream. The company also has exposure to other precious metals, including silver. In fact, WPM is the largest silver streaming company in the world. I recommended readers of my premium investing service Yield Shark buy Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) on October 23. Since this recommendation, this position is up 30.1%. This is part of my Yield Shark portfolio. All tickers but WPM are hidden as they are only available to Yield Shark subscribers ([Click to enlarge]() Compare that to a 2.2% return from the S&P 500. The stock also pays a safe 1.6% dividend. To put it another way, this company allows you to earn a safe, steady income while protecting you from extreme socialist policies like the Green New Deal. It’s a total no-brainer. But this is only one of the many investment opportunities in [Yield Shark](. Subscribers to my premium investment service Yield Shark get the best dividend-paying stocks in their inbox every month. And while the DJIA lost 6% last year, my low-risk portfolio delivered a total return of 4.2%. If you want a taste of the types of stocks I recommend in Yield Shark, download my latest free special report. It includes three of my favorite dividend-paying stocks. Investors need to prepare for potentially out-of-control spending after the next election. The best way to protect your portfolio is with safe stocks like Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM). Bulletproof your portfolio before it’s too late. If you want a good place to start, [watch my video about Yield Shark here.]( [John Mauldin] Robert Ross Copyright © 2019 Mauldin Economics. All Rights Reserved Mauldin Economics, LLC | PO Box 192495 | Dallas, TX 75219 [Click here to manage your email preferences.](

Marketing emails from mauldineconomics.com

View More
Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

01/10/2024

Sent On

27/09/2024

Sent On

20/09/2024

Sent On

13/09/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.