Newsletter Subject

The Man Spending $500 Million to Restore Your Digital Privacy

From

mauldineconomics.com

Email Address

subscribers@mauldineconomics.com

Sent On

Fri, Mar 22, 2024 02:09 PM

Email Preheader Text

This has big investment implications, too. Seems like I hit a nerve. Earlier this week, I shared my

This has big investment implications, too. [Read Online]( [Global Macro Update] [Global Macro Update] The Man Spending $500 Million to Restore Your Digital Privacy By Ed D'Agostino | March 22, 2024 [Ed D'Agostino] Seems like I hit a nerve. Earlier this week, I shared my thoughts on a ban or forced sale of social media platform TikTok. The Chinese Communist Party can use it to surveil and manipulate Americans, and we should ban it immediately. Many of you sent thoughtful feedback, which I appreciate. China’s influence is only one of the problems with social media. We have a bigger problem, not just with social media but the entire internet. We’ve lost our privacy. The problem is so grave that people under age 30 have no concept of online privacy whatsoever. They’ve always had digital lives on Facebook, Instagram, Snap Chat, or TikTok—whatever the app of the moment happens to be. For many, this has diminished their quality of life, hindered their ability to form real relationships, and in extreme cases proven lethal. Meanwhile, no one told these young people that they were the product. Today, I’m asking for your help with my next Global Macro Update interview, which I’ll share with you next week. I’m speaking with Frank McCourt, the executive chairman of McCourt Global (and former LA Dodgers owner). He’s also the founder of [Project Liberty]( and co-author of the just-released book, [Our Biggest Fight](. Frank has pledged $500 million of his personal fortune to making the internet and social media safer for all of us, especially our children. This comes down to restoring our privacy. Frank wants a practical way to let individuals decide what personal information tech platforms can track and share—and with whom. He wants to put people back in control of their information. This movement to reclaim control from Big Tech is quickly becoming a groundswell. It has big implications for investors, too. [ShareÂ]( Take META (aka Facebook), for example. As I write, shares are trading around $505. The company, which employs 60,000 people, has a $1.294 trillion market cap on revenue of $134.9 billion. Its price-to-earnings ratio is 34.35. This behemoth is controlled by one of the richest tech bros on Earth. You could argue that Mr. Zuckerberg is directly responsible for much of the social angst, election manipulation, and declining mental health many experience daily. He built his fortune by twisting the internet into something few anticipated or wanted. He also built wealth for shareholders, which I fully support. But let’s be frank about how that happened. What will tech billionaires like Zuckerberg, Musk, or Bezos do when they face losing access to their treasure trove of data? Will they finally fess up to doing more harm than good and work to restore privacy? Or will they fight efforts to take back our data? The righteous path is clear. What is not clear is which companies, if any, will take it. Businesses that do will find new ways to generate revenue. I support that and remain, as always, pro-business. But true capitalism is based on free exchange. When your only choice is relinquishing your private data or living totally off the grid, is it really a choice? Personally, I’m rooting for Frank McCourt, and I look forward to sharing my conversation with him next week. Here’s where I ask you a favor. If you have some free time this weekend, please check out the information at [OurBiggestFight.com]( or pick up a copy of [the book]( by the same name. Then hit the comment link below and let me know your thoughts. I’ll send you a link to our interview next Tuesday. Thanks for reading. [ShareÂ]( [Ed D'Agostino] [Ed D'Agostino] Ed D'Agostino Publisher & COO Mauldin Economics Suggested Reading... [India Could Dominate the World or "Collapse in on Itself"](  [Higher for Longer?]( Don't let friends miss this timely insight— share it with your network now. Share Your Thoughts on This Article [Post a Comment]( Keep up with Mauldin Economics on the go. Download the App [Get it on Google Play]( [Download on the App Store]( [ Did someone forward this letter to you? [Click here to get]( Global Macro Update in your inbox every Friday. [Read important disclosures here.]( YOUR USE OF THESE MATERIALS IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF THESE DISCLOSURES. --------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent as part of your subscription to Global Macro Update. [To update your email preferences click here.]( Mauldin Economics | 1417 Sadler Road, PMB 415 | Fernandina Beach, FL 32034 Copyright © 2024 Mauldin Economics. All Rights Reserved.

Marketing emails from mauldineconomics.com

View More
Sent On

10/05/2024

Sent On

07/05/2024

Sent On

26/04/2024

Sent On

23/04/2024

Sent On

21/04/2024

Sent On

19/04/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.