Newsletter Subject

Grabbing The Next Meme Stock

From

marketwealthdaily.com

Email Address

support@marketwealthdaily.com

Sent On

Wed, May 15, 2024 11:11 AM

Email Preheader Text

Roaring Kitty strikes again! Roaring Kitty strikes again! In a world of semi-rational stock movement

Roaring Kitty strikes again! Roaring Kitty strikes again! In a world of semi-rational stock movement, we are now pricing in a highly irrational trade element that, at the same time, is very rational in its behavior. You may recall that in January of 2021, GameStop stock (GME) rallied in an incredible short squeeze that was attributed to “reddit trading” and many small traders all buying and holding on for dear life. It was expected to be a once in a lifetime if not once ever type of trading scenario, as the market hyped up positions where many large investors were betting on bankruptcy, highlighted by GameStop. Along came “Roaring Kitty”, a social media/reddit  poster and relatively small trader by market standards that advocated for GME being a potentially valuable company, not the zero that was being bet on by large hedge funds. Long story short, the stock rallied from under $1/share (split adjusted) to over $120/share over the course of a couple of months. The trade made millions of dollars for some, and lost billions of dollars for others. And now, “Roaring Kitty” has returned to reddit and is impacting the market once again, causing a major spike in GME: [Get Keith's Market Maker Cheat Sheet here for free!]( As you can see here in the 6-month chart, there’s a massive spike. I included the 5-year chart to make sure it was clear what happened last time (and what happened after, as this will also be crucial for future trade setups depending on what happens this time). Now that it’s happening again, how can I benefit? What stocks might have a similar type of move, but haven’t fully priced into the market yet? Will it be AMC? FFIE? Or something else? Let’s look at charts for FFIE just to see how crazy that potential might look if we want to get wild with an idea: FFIE would seem to have the most upside given its prior high around $5,000/share (split adjusted), but that doesn’t mean it’s the best trade, particularly with the pricing of the options. It seems unlikely that this stock will be rebounding into the thousands of dollars per share, but I can never bet against the crowd, so for now, I’d rather not fight this potential tsunami. But is this the best trade? Perhaps it’ll be some other stock that could generate one of those 100x returns this time instead of GME or FFIE? For me, I am looking back to a name that had large short interest in 2021, and while it’s less shorted today, it could still become a darling of the reddit stock trade, once again – PLUG Power: FFIE would seem to have the most upside given its prior high around $5,000/share (split adjusted), but that doesn’t mean it’s the best trade, particularly with the pricing of the options. It seems unlikely that this stock will be rebounding into the thousands of dollars per share, but I can never bet against the crowd, so for now, I’d rather not fight this potential tsunami. But is this the best trade? Perhaps it’ll be some other stock that could generate one of those 100x returns this time instead of GME or FFIE? For me, I am looking back to a name that had large short interest in 2021, and while it’s less shorted today, it could still become a darling of the reddit stock trade, once again – PLUG Power: Again, I included both the 6-month and 5-year charts here so we could evaluate the potential for a move in the case that GME buyers go back to the same symbols that worked last time instead of focusing on names with the highest short interest today. If PLUG wants to repeat that kind of move and even get into the $30 range instead of the prior high at $68/share, I can make an absolute killing on the stock, particularly if I incorporate options. But options aren’t particularly cheap today if we simply see a return to the behavior of the last few years, and that’s important to note when structuring a complex trade with a complex leveraged potential payout. The good news with this type of trade is that I can exercise patience and look for other names that could have a similar type of payout this time and an interesting leveraged option trade. Perhaps it will be NYCB that was previously mentioned, or perhaps it’ll be one of the many biotech companies with high short interest. To see more of the names I’m looking at for this potential move, you’ll certainly want to sign up for my Outlier Watch List! And as always, please go to []( to review how I traditionally apply technical signals, volatility analysis, and probability analysis to my options trades. And if you have any questions, never hesitate to reach out. Keith Harwood Keith@optionhotline.com --------------------------------------------------------------- See Related Articles on [TradewinsDaily.com]( [Grabbing The Next Meme Stock]( [eCommerce Giant Signals A Breakout]( [ITA ETF: Technicals Signal a ‘Buy’]( [Three Top Ways to Profit from the AI Boom]( [Bollinger Bands]( --------------------------------------------------------------- [TradeWins Logo]( © 2024 Tradewins Publishing. All rights reserved. | [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms and Conditions]( | [Contact Us]( Auto-trading, or any broker or advisor-directed type of trading, is not supported or endorsed by TradeWins. For additional information on auto-trading, you may visit the SEC's website: All About Auto-Trading, TradeWins does not recommend or refer subscribers to broker-dealers. You should perform your own due diligence with respect to satisfactory broker-dealers and whether to open a brokerage account. You should always consult with your own professional advisers regarding equities and options on equities trading. 1. The information provided by the newsletters, trading, training and educational products related to various markets (collectively referred to as the "Services") is not customized or personalized to any particular risk profile or tolerance. Nor is the information published by TradeWins Publishing ("TradeWins") a customized or personalized recommendation to buy, sell, hold, or invest in particular financial products. The Services are intended to supplement your own research and analysis. 2. TradeWins' Services are not a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any financial products, and the Services are not intended to provide money management advice or services. 3. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Trading and investing involve substantial risk. Trading on margin carries a high level of risk, and may not be suitable for all investors. Other than the refund policy detailed elsewhere, TradeWins does not make any guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using the Services. No person subscribing for the Services ("Subscriber") should make any investment decision without first consulting his or her own personal financial adviser, broker or consultant. TradeWins disclaims any and all liability in the event anything contained in the Services proves to be inaccurate, incomplete or unreliable, or results in any investment or other loss by a Subscriber. 4. You should trade or invest only "risk capital" money you can afford to lose. Trading stocks and stock options involves high risk and you can lose the entire principal amount invested or more. 5. All investments carry risk and all trading decisions made by a person remain the responsibility of that person. There is no guarantee that systems, indicators, or trading signals will result in profits or that they will not produce losses. Subscribers should fully understand all risks associated with any kind of trading or investing before engaging in such activities. 6. Some profit examples are based on hypothetical or simulated trading. This means the trades are not actual trades and instead are hypothetical trades based on real market prices at the time the recommendation is disseminated. No actual money is invested, nor are any trades executed. Hypothetical or simulated performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. Also, the hypothetical results do not include the costs of subscriptions, commissions, or other fees. Because the trades underlying these examples have not actually been executed, the results may understate or overstate the impact of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated trading services in general are also designed with the benefit of hindsight, which may not be relevant to actual trading. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. TradeWins makes no representations or warranties that any account will or is likely to achieve profits similar to those shown. 7. No representation is being made that you will achieve profits or the same results as any person providing testimonial. No representation is being made that any person providing a testimonial is likely to continue to experience profitable trading after the date on which the testimonial was provided, and in fact the person providing the testimonial may have experienced losses. 8. The author experiences are not typical. The author is an experienced investor and your results will vary depending on risk tolerance, amount of risk capital utilized, size of trading position and other factors. Certain Subscribers may modify the author methods, or modify or ignore the rules or risk parameters, and any such actions are taken entirely at the Subscriber's own election and for the Subscriber's own risk. You are currently subscribed to Market Wealth Daily as: {EMAIL}. TradeWins Publishing Corp.528 North Country Rd.St. James, NY 11780 | [1 Click unsubscribe]( | [Report SPAM]( |

Marketing emails from marketwealthdaily.com

View More
Sent On

13/06/2024

Sent On

13/06/2024

Sent On

10/06/2024

Sent On

09/06/2024

Sent On

08/06/2024

Sent On

05/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.