Newsletter Subject

MTM Weekly Market Recap

From

markettaker.com

Email Address

support@markettaker.com

Sent On

Tue, Sep 28, 2021 06:02 PM

Email Preheader Text

Hey there MTM Family, Dan here! Man what a week we’ve had… Are you seeing all the shifts i

[image] Hey there MTM Family, Dan here! Man what a week we’ve had… Are you seeing all the shifts in the market as of late? Let me talk to you a bit about what we’ve seen and dive into our weekly market recap. Just make sure you read to the bottom of this email - you’ll see that there’s still so many big win opportunities coming out of the markets. We kicked off Monday with the market gapping lower and continued to as it struggled to rally back. - A SPY bear call spread for a credit of 0.60 was set-up over some resistance along with a QQQ long put for a debit of 0.52 was modeled out. - In addition, a TSLA Sep-24 695/700 bull put spread for a credit of 0.70 as well as a FB bear put spread for a debit of 2.90. Tuesday kicked off with the market gapping higher and held its own through class. We looked at several bear call spreads with general weakness in the market prevailing. - An AMZN bear call for a credit of 1.20 was looked at as well as another one on BA for bear call for a credit of 0.33. Generally the market would stay flat before a big announcement like the one the Federal Reserve announced this week, but not on Wednesday! The market marched higher in front of the Fed meeting. And with that, a couple of longer-term trades were looked at. - A NIO Nov-19 45/55/65 call butterfly for 0.50 was modeled out with the expectation that the stock will move higher in the next month. - One of Dan’s OptionsRaider trades was looked at too; a long Oct-15 26 call on QS for a cost of 1.08. The market continued to move higher after the rally Wednesday even after the Fed’s announcement in the afternoon. Despite jobless claims increasing just like last week, market participants were out in full force buying with Nasdaq gapping above its 50-day moving average again. - Because of the gap higher, a QQQ (Nasdaq ETF) Oct-1 362.5/365 bull put for a credit of 0.33 was modeled. - With FB getting hammered down on Wednesday, a potential support level at $340 was looked at. A Oct-1 335/340 bull put spread for a credit of 0.90 was considered. You remember the QS long-call trade from Wednesday? Well, it was up over 200% in just 48 hours with a bid of 3.55! Do you want the opportunity to see these trades and many, many more live in action everyday? A chance to bring your market and symbol questions to get answered? A ‘live alert service’ everyday where you get to trade side by side with our very own expert trader John K. Then you’ll want to click the link below. [Click here and join us for MTM Group Coaching.]( [Profile Image] Dan Passarelli Market Taker Mentoring dan@markettaker.com (779) 324-2110 - Work PS. If you have questions about group coaching just hit the reply button on your email and say “I want more information on group coaching” and one of our team members will personally reach out to you. [Happy Trading MTM Fam.]( Any trading strategies discussed in this email are for educational and informative purposes only. All information disclosed in this email should not be considered complete in its entirety. Market Taker Mentoring, Inc. will not be held responsible for changes, oversights, errors or omissions. Dates, prices, news and other information may not be accurate. Please verify all information before trading. You alone are responsible for your own investment decisions. Options involve risk and are not suitable for all investors. Before trading options, please read Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Option (ODD), which can be obtained from your broker; by calling (888) OPTIONS; or from The Options Clearing Corp., 125 S. Franklin St., Suite 1200, Chicago, IL 60606. No statement is intended to be a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security or to provide investment or trading advice. Traders and investors considering options should consult a professional tax advisor as to how taxes may affect the outcome of contemplated options transactions. Market Taker Mentoring makes no guarantees of trading results. Results may vary. Past performance does not indicate future results. Copyright Market Taker Mentoring, Inc. 2008 - 2020. All rights reserved. Reproducing or redistributing this content is a violation of federal law. [Unsubscribe]( Market Taker Mentoring, Inc. PO Box 117 Frankfort, Illinois 60423 United States

Marketing emails from markettaker.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.