Newsletter Subject

Happy New Year- Welcome to Linux Journal 2.0!

From

linuxjournal.com

Email Address

publisher@linuxjournal.com

Sent On

Wed, Jan 3, 2018 08:27 PM

Email Preheader Text

Happy New Year- Welcome to Linux Journal 2.0! Happy New Year- Welcome to Linux Journal 2.0! Talk abo

Happy New Year- Welcome to Linux Journal 2.0! Happy New Year- Welcome to Linux Journal 2.0! Talk about a Happy New Year. The reason: it turns out we're not dead. In fact, we're more alive than ever, thanks to a rescue by readers—specifically, by the hackers who run [Private Internet Access]( (PIA) VPN, a [London Trust Media]( company. PIA are avid supporters of [freenode]( and the larger FOSS community. They’re also all about Linux and the rest of the modern portfolio of allied concerns: privacy, crypto, freedom, personal agency, rewriting the rules of business and government around all of those, and having fun with constructive hacking of all kinds. We couldn’t have asked for a better rescue ship to come along for us. In addition, they aren't merely rescuing this ship we were ready to scuttle; they're making it seaworthy again and are committed to making it bigger and better than we were ever in a position to think about during our entirely self-funded past. This is exactly what we had hoped for in recent years, but hardly expected. Really and truly, I waited to put up our [farewell post]( until all hope was lost. But hey, it turns out you don't have to believe in miracles to experience one, because that's exactly what happened here. So here's what I know for sure, so far. First, the PIA people are hard-core Linux, free software and open-source hackers. They are just as committed to FOSS values as [Phil Hughes]( was when he published the first issue of Linux Journal in April 1994, the same month Linus released version 1.0 of Linux. (Friends and colleagues of Phil's, especially those who worked for him at Linux Journal for many years, know how completely principled he was and still is.) They also want to do right by developers, users, and the whole free and open networked world. That's one reason they stepped forward to save us. Second, they’re eager to support us in building Linux Journal 2.0around the substantial core of devoted readers we had through the many years of Linux Journal 1.x. And, this means we need to hear from you. How and where would you like us to go, now that we're back afloat and our purpose is to thrive and not just to survive? For that, at the very least, we'll be hanging out in the #linuxjournal channel at [freenode.net](. We'll also be making some long overdue improvements to the website. While that’s going on, we will open conversational channels there too. Third, expect to see familiar names and faces continuing to work here. I'm staying on, as will Jill Franklin, Doc Searls and others. We also will be recruiting talent for covering Linux and topics in adjacent areas that are as hot (or ready to be) as Linux was in 1994. Fourth, we are committed to giving our subscribers everything we can to reward their support. For starters, if you haven't yet claimed your archive of all Linux Journal back issues, please ping me (carliefairchild at linuxjournal dot com). While we collectively brainstorm what Linux Journal 2.0 will become, our subscribers will be at the forefront of those discussions. You've stood by us, and that support means everything to us. Stay tuned. Fifth (but not finally), we are committed to leading the way toward new and better business models for publishing than the usual suspects we've seen so far. Doc Searls, who in addition to his work at Linux Journal has been running ProjectVRM out of Harvard's Berkman Klein Center since ‘06, is eager to use Linux Journal 2.0 as a laboratory for expanding one corner of that work: creating better ways of doing advertising that supports publishers, rather than the kind that chases tracked eyeballs—and for moving beyond the advertising model as well. Help with that is also welcome. So again, thanks for your support for so many years, and thanks in advance for the fresh help we are sure to get as we set sail again on a better ship than ever. Sincerely, Carlie Fairchild, Publisher P.S. Editor in Chief, Doc Searls is asking for your help. Linux Journal was a print magazine for 17+ years, then a digital one for the next 7+ [What shall we be now?]( [Facebook]( [Twitter]( Linux Journal PO Box 170127, Austin, TX 78717 You are receiving this email because you are either a subscriber or have signed up to receive notifications from Linux Journal [Unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from linuxjournal.com

View More
Sent On

08/08/2019

Sent On

05/08/2019

Sent On

29/07/2019

Sent On

22/07/2019

Sent On

15/07/2019

Sent On

08/07/2019

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.