Newsletter Subject

🏆 3 Lessons From Tech's Past Champions

From

libertythroughwealth.com

Email Address

ltw@mb.libertythroughwealth.com

Sent On

Tue, Dec 21, 2021 04:43 PM

Email Preheader Text

The life cycles of the world's largest technology stocks are more predictable than you think. SPONSO

The life cycles of the world's largest technology stocks are more predictable than you think. [Shield] AN OXFORD CLUB PUBLICATION [Liberty Through Wealth]( [View in browser]( SPONSORED [5G Stock CRUSHES Earnings!!]( [5G SuperStocks]( Wall Street is loading up on shares of one 5G SuperStock (with more than $2 billion invested!). Why? Because the stock brings in more cash than IBM, Facebook and even Google! Yet it trades for just $3. [Get the scoop on the 5G SuperStock right here.]( EDITOR'S NOTE On December 29, at 8 p.m. ET, our very own Alexander Green will sit down with Chief Income Strategist Marc Lichtenfeld to discuss [how to boost your Oxford Club returns by as much as six times in 2022](. In their FREE online presentation, Alex and Marc will show you how to [minimize risk and maximize profits](. If you're looking to set yourself up for a profitable 2022, you won't want to miss [THIS](. [Click here to register now for the free online event.]( THE SHORTEST WAY TO A RICH LIFE [What the 1960s Tech Boom Can Teach Today's Investors]( [Nicholas Vardy | Quantitative Strategist | The Oxford Club]( [Nicholas Vardy]( Big Tech dominates the global investing landscape like never before. Today, the world's four largest technology stocks - Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL), Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT), Alphabet (Nasdaq: GOOGL) and Amazon (Nasdaq: AMZN) - account for 23% of the market capitalization of the S&P 500. Put another way, just 0.8% of the index's companies account for close to a quarter of its value. Such dominance of technology in the stock market may be unprecedented. But investors' focus on the promise of the technology sector certainly isn't. Most investors equate the first technology boom with the dot-com era of the 1990s. Few are old enough to recall the tech boom of the 1960s and early 1970s. Yet that period was also flush with innovation. It witnessed the invention of the first video game console, the computer mouse, LEDs, lasers and even the first email. In the 1960s, the "Nifty Fifty" - the 50 fast-growing large cap stocks - were all the rage. And the one-decision leading tech stocks of the era were IBM (NYSE: IBM), Kodak (NYSE: KODK), Polaroid and Xerox (Nasdaq: XRX). But how many of those names are still relevant? Today I want to review the rise and fall of these former tech giants - and what their journeys teach us about the dynamic nature of tech investing. SPONSORED [The "Secret Tech Companies" Delivering Big Profits]( [Cirrus Logic]( Cirrus Logic... Q Technology... Micron Technology... these are all little-known tech stocks that saw 10-bagger gains after getting into the Big Tech supply chains. It took as little as 18 months or as long as 12 years. And now, another $10 stock could join them. It just broke into the Tesla and Samsung supply chains. And Apple reportedly is collaborating with the company on a $330 million facility to add the company's tech to the iPad and iPhone. What is this special tech that the $10 stock developed? [See it in action right here.]( Xerox: The Dynamic Upstart Founded in 1906 as the Haloid Company, Xerox was the Google of its day. For instance, Xerox's dominance turned its name into a verb. And just as they did with Google, early investors made a fortune in Xerox. One hundred shares of Xerox, purchased for $20 each on April 17, 1936, turned into 108,000 Xerox shares by 2000. At their peak price of around $155 in April 1999, those shares were worth about $16.8 million. Xerox was a cutting-edge innovator. In the late 1950s, it approached IBM to help fund and sell its copier post-launch. IBM rejected Xerox, saying its copier was too heavy for IBM's typewriter salesmen to carry. Xerox was forced to market it alone and launched the first office copier - the 914 - in 1959. Cleverly, Xerox charged customers a nominal monthly fee covering the first 2,000 copies. After that, the company billed $0.05 a copy - Xerox's copy machine was practically printing money. Xerox quickly locked up a 90% market share of the copying market. Alas, Xerox got too big for its breeches. In 1968, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission charged Xerox with monopolistic practices. As a result, Xerox signed a consent decree in 1975, under which the government forced Xerox to grant competitors patent licenses. IBM introduced its office copier in 1970. Xerox sued IBM for patent infringement. It won the case. But it was awarded only $25 million. Xerox's monopoly on its money-printing machine was broken. But then in 1973, Xerox's Palo Alto Research Center developed the world's first personal computer, called the Alto. The Alto boasted a mouse, a user-friendly interface and networking capabilities. The problem is Xerox never marketed it. Why? According to former Xerox employee Mike Tubbs, Xerox's top managers were from Ford. As a result, they believed in making modest improvements to existing products instead of launching innovative new ones. Instead it took upstarts like Apple and Sun Microsystems to develop personal computers modeled on the Alto. Xerox had long lost its innovative edge. Xerox is still around today. But with a market cap of just $3.6 billion, it has morphed into a small cap stock. Kodak Versus Polaroid IBM was Xerox's fierce rival, and Polaroid played that role for Kodak. Kodak was the market leader in photographic film. Polaroid invented polarizers for sunglasses and 3D imaging. In that era's iPhone moment, scrappy Polaroid launched the "pocket-sized" SX-70 color instant camera in 1972. The SX-70 single-lens reflex instant camera produced a fully developed color print in one minute. It was an instant success. Not surprisingly, Kodak promptly copied Polaroid's technology. As a result, Polaroid sued Kodak for patent infringement in 1976. Polaroid won an astonishing $925 million in damages. The size of the settlement forced Kodak to abandon all instant cameras and films. Meanwhile, Steve Sasson, a Kodak engineer, invented the first digital camera in 1975. How did Kodak's management react? "That's cute - but don't tell anyone about it." After all, the digital cameras would cannibalize Kodak's massive revenues from film photography. But the digital photography cat was out of the bag. In the end, Polaroid declared bankruptcy in 2001. Kodak lasted until 2012. Three Lessons for Today's Tech Investors What are the lessons for today's tech companies - and investors? First, the life cycle of technology firms can be remarkably predictable. The names may change. But the plot of the story invariably runs something like this... An entrepreneurial upstart develops a novel technology that becomes a hit. Established players copy it. Lawsuits ensue as rivals battle it out in the court system. If the upstart becomes too dominant, the government clamps down. In the meantime, the upstart itself becomes an established player. It fails to reinvent itself. Its success story fizzles. Once you understand this story arc, you can make money on technology companies on the way up and on the way down. Second, there is no such thing as a one-decision tech stock. Today, few believe that any company will ever rival the power and influence of Apple, Google or Amazon. Yet investors thought the same about IBM, Xerox, Kodak and Polaroid. And as recently as 2007, BlackBerry and Nokia boasted unassailable market positions. Today, of these companies, only IBM remains of any consequence. Third, technological progress is messy and chaotic. Technology companies must reinvent themselves constantly. If they don't, their demise is not a matter of "if" but "when." Xerox ignored the PC. Kodak buried digital photography. Yes, new technologies will cannibalize sales of existing products. But that's just the way technology works. On April 9, 2007, Apple sold its 100 millionth iPod, which accounted for the bulk of Apple's revenues. Today, the iPod does not exist. Apple was smart enough to reinvent itself. Time will tell whether that relentless commitment to reinvention will continue. I can't tell you which of today's tech giants will still be around 40 years from now. But I can tell you that the list of the world's most valuable tech companies will look very different. Good investing, Nicholas [Video: More Than a Meme]( [Click here]( to watch Nicholas' latest video update. For the latest news from Nicholas, connect on [Facebook]( and [Twitter](. JOIN THE CONVERSATION [Facebook]( [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Twitter]( [Email Share](mailto:?subject=A%20great%20piece%20from%20Liberty%20Through%20Wealth...&body=From%20Liberty%20Through%20Wealth:%0D%0A%0D%0AThe%20life%20cycles%20of%20the%20world's%20largest%20technology%20stocks%20are%20more%20predictable%20than%20you%20think.%0D%0A%0D [Email Share](mailto:?subject=A%20great%20piece%20from%20Liberty%20Through%20Wealth...&body=From%20Liberty%20Through%20Wealth:%0D%0A%0D%0AThe%20life%20cycles%20of%20the%20world's%20largest%20technology%20stocks%20are%20more%20predictable%20than%20you%20think.%0D%0A%0D MORE FROM LIBERTY THROUGH WEALTH [Resting Hikers]( [The Second Requirement for a Richer Life]( [Couple Reads the Newspaper]( [A Fertile Trough]( [Ark Invest]( [The Looming Collapse of Cathie Wood and Ark Invest]( [Should You Worry About 2022]( [Should You Worry About 2022?]( SPONSORED [Award-Winning Investment Expert: "This Could Be the Biggest - and Most Surprising - Prediction of My Career."]( [Andy Snyder on Mic]( I've NEVER seen [potential like this]( before... Not when I called Netflix at $6 more than a decade ago. (It recently topped $600.) Not when I pointed regular Americans to the [#2 investment of the last decade](. (Second only to Tesla.) And not even when I said they had "a shot at big money" with Advanced Micro Devices back in 2008. If you've been sitting on the sidelines waiting for a chance to turn a small stake into a transformative payday... [THIS could be it.]( Don't hesitate. With every passing moment, the [extraordinary profit potential]( could shrink. [>> You need to SEE THIS NOW]( [The Oxford Club]( You are receiving this email because you subscribed to Liberty Through Wealth. Liberty Through Wealth is published by The Oxford Club. Questions? Check out our [FAQs](. Trying to reach us? [Contact us here.]( Please do not reply to this email as it goes to an unmonitored inbox. [Privacy Policy]( | [Whitelist Liberty Through Wealth]( | [Unsubscribe]( © 2021 The Oxford Club, LLC All Rights Reserved The Oxford Club | [105 West Monument Street](#) | [Baltimore, MD 21201](#) North America: [1.800.589.3430](#) | International: [+1.443.353.4334](#) | Fax: [1.410.329.1923](#) [Oxfordclub.com]( The Oxford Club is a financial publisher that does not offer any personal financial advice or advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment for any specific individual. Members should be aware that although our track record is highly rated by an independent analysis and has been legally reviewed, investment markets have inherent risks and there can be no guarantee of future profits. The stated returns may also include option trades. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in their own securities recommendations to readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after online publication or 72 hours after the mailing of printed-only publications prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended by The Oxford Club should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. The information found on this website may only be used pursuant to the membership or subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of The Oxford Club, 105 W. Monument Street, Baltimore MD 21201.

Marketing emails from libertythroughwealth.com

View More
Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

01/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.