Market 🆚 Moonshot: Who Wins?

A tiny percentage of companies account for all the market's gains. So how should investors position themselves? [Liberty Through Wealth]( SPONSORED [@#$%!]( [Angry Businesswoman]( You missed these one-day gains... 51% on Canopy Growth... 73% on Dick's Sporting Goods... 95% on Conn's... 121% on Abercrombie & Fitch... 113% on Ciena... 108% on UPS... 133% on Kellogg... 136% on Ambarella... 116% on Pinterest... 130% on Twitter... 178% on Yum Brands... and 188% on FedEx! [Click here to stop @#$%ing around and get what's yours.]( Note from Managing Editor Allison Brickell: If you've been following the headlines, you know the crypto craze has been building. And all signs point to Bitcoin getting bigger. Chief Income Strategist Marc Lichtenfeld has pinpointed a stock that could help investors collect a hefty payday from the crypto markets - no complicated crypto wallet needed. [Click here to learn more.]( THE SHORTEST WAY TO A RICH LIFE Two Investment Strategies: Market vs. Moonshot Nicholas Vardy | Quantitative Strategist | The Oxford Club [Nicholas Vardy] Finance academics crank out hundreds of new papers every year. Yet, over the past 30 years, not much has changed in how investing is taught at the world's leading business schools. Validated by a handful of Nobel Prizes, the religion that is "[modern financial theory]( is set in stone. And so is its investment advice: "You can't beat the market. So invest only in index funds." That is not bad advice. After all, if you invest in an index fund, you will match the market. And by doing so, you'll trounce the long-term returns generated by your average fund manager. Enter Hendrik Bessembinder, a finance professor at Arizona State University. The London Financial Times just dubbed him the "high priest of moonshot investing." And the lessons Bessembinder learned about investing in public markets are similar to those Silicon Valley investors learned about investing in startups. That investing in a handful of the right companies is the key to generating market-crushing returns. All this doesn't upend the prescription of sticking to index funds. But it does put that advice in a new light. The Genesis of "Moonshot Investing" Back in 2016, Bessembinder published a paper that came to a surprising conclusion. Of the roughly 26,000 companies that traded on the New York Stock Exchange, American Stock Exchange or Nasdaq between 1926 and 2016, more than half lost money or had worse performance than an investor would have seen from simply holding 1-month Treasurys. In contrast, about 1,000 stocks - or just 4% of the entire sample - accounted for all of the market's gains. The net wealth generated by the winners came to a whopping $35 trillion - almost twice the current U.S. GDP. In 2019, Bessembinder showed that [international stock returns]( were even more skewed. About 61% of non-U.S. stocks underperformed Treasury bills in the 1990 to 2018 period. Less than 1% accounted for the entire $16 trillion of net wealth creation. SPONSORED [Bill O'Reilly Did What?!?]( [Bill O'Reilly Gesture]( Bill O'Reilly is no stranger to controversy. The mainstream media LOVES bashing him. And they might just have a field day with this. Because Bill is releasing [his most controversial project]( yet. [See what it's all about right here.]( Two (Contradictory) Conclusions You could take Bessembinder's conclusions as an argument that confirms the strategy of [passive investing](. If so few stocks account for all the market's gains, you should "buy the entire haystack" rather than look for the few needles buried in it. After all, even investment professionals don't have a lasting edge in identifying those needles over the long term. Alternatively, confident investors will read Bessembinder's conclusions as an argument for stock picking. Assuming you can pick stocks, you should aggressively invest in a small number of potential superstars. The winner-takes-all dynamic of today's [Silicon Valley-style economy]( also implies that lottery tickets pay off far more than they have in the past. As long as you can identify just one or two winners, the price you pay for a winning stock almost doesn't matter. A few future stock market winners can more than compensate for losses. Is Moonshot Investing Just Angel Investing? Bessembinder's research reminds me of [Jason Calacanis]( one of Silicon Valley's leading angel investors. (Angel investors are generally the very first outside investors in a company.) Calacanis had similar insight into the dynamics of angel investing in Silicon Valley. He found that a few massive winners account for far more of your investment gains than you'd ever expect. He describes this phenomenon with a clever baseball metaphor. If you're a baseball fan, you know that a grand slam - a bases-loaded home run - is worth four runs. Calacanis says that with a successful angel investment, it's as though the rules of baseball changed overnight and... A grand slam became worth 100 home runs. An investment that would typically earn you four to five times your money... Instead generates a 100X return. And in Silicon Valley, that 100 home run metaphor may even be conservative. Calacanis writes that he invested $25,000 in Uber at a $5 million valuation. Today its valuation is almost $88 billion. My back-of-the-envelope calculation shows that Calacanis' investment would be worth $440 million today. That's an astonishing 17,600X return. Here's the Catch A couple of caveats are in order. First, the investment industry is not particularly good at predicting winners over time. Taking the active approach endorses strategies like Cathie Wood's Ark Invest. Ark Invest makes outsized bets on hot technology stocks - similar to what Silicon Valley calls moonshots. As [I've written before]( that approach scares me. For every fund manager who invested in Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) while it was trading in the single digits, hundreds of others fell (and still fall) short. And it seems that the winners' luck inevitably runs out. Wood and Ark Invest may already be firmly on that path. For most people, buying the haystack that is the market still makes the most sense. So what's your preferred investment strategy? Market or moonshots? Let me know by clicking the comment button below. Good investing, Nicholas P.S. If you're interested in a more in-depth - and in-person - conversation about different investing strategies, I recommend you join me on The Oxford Club's Wealth, Wine & Wander Retreat. From August 28 to September 5, a small group of attendees will experience the beauty of Paris, Amsterdam and Normandy, along with insightful financial presentations from Alexander Green and me. [Click here to learn more.]( [Leave a Comment]( [Was I Right About Fedex]( [Click here]( to watch Nicholas' latest video update. For the latest news from Nicholas, connect on [Facebook]( and [Twitter](. JOIN THE CONVERSATION [Facebook]( [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Twitter]( [Email Share](mailto:?subject=A%20great%20piece%20from%20Liberty%20Through%20Wealth...&body=From%20Liberty%20Through%20Wealth:%0D%0A%0D%0AA%20tiny%20percentage%20of%20companies%20account%20for%20all%20the%20market's%20gains.%20So%20how%20should%20investors%20position%20themselves?%0D%0A%0D [Email Share](mailto:?subject=A%20great%20piece%20from%20Liberty%20Through%20Wealth...&body=From%20Liberty%20Through%20Wealth:%0D%0A%0D%0AA%20tiny%20percentage%20of%20companies%20account%20for%20all%20the%20market's%20gains.%20So%20how%20should%20investors%20position%20themselves?%0D%0A%0D MORE FROM LIBERTY THROUGH WEALTH [The Man Who Almost Killed Bob Rotella]( [What "Free" Government Costs Workers and Investors]( [Swing Trade Recommendation Review]( SPONSORED [If a Janitor Can Use "Income for Life" Stocks to Build a Life-Changing Fortune... So Can YOU!]( [Janitor_Mopping]( Ever heard the story of the Vermont gas station attendant and janitor who also managed to amass a huge fortune? He didn't have a finance degree... and he certainly never made a six-figure salary. Yet over an estimated 65 years, he managed to build a HUGE nest egg - all thanks to what we call "Income for Life" stocks. [Click here to keep reading...]( [The Oxford Club]( You are receiving this email because you subscribed to Liberty Through Wealth. Liberty Through Wealth is published by The Oxford Club. Questions? Check out our [FAQs](. Trying to reach us? [Contact us here.]( Please do not reply to this email as it goes to an unmonitored inbox. [Privacy Policy]( | [Whitelist Liberty Through Wealth]( | [Unsubscribe]( © 2021 The Oxford Club, LLC All Rights Reserved The Oxford Club | [105 West Monument Street](#) | [Baltimore, MD 21201](#) North America: [1.800.589.3430](#) | International: [+1.443.353.4334](#) | Fax: [1.410.329.1923](#) [Oxfordclub.com]( The Oxford Club is a financial publisher that does not offer any personal financial advice or advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment for any specific individual. Members should be aware that although our track record is highly rated by an independent analysis and has been legally reviewed, investment markets have inherent risks and there can be no guarantee of future profits. The stated returns may also include option trades. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in their own securities recommendations to readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after online publication or 72 hours after the mailing of printed-only publications prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended by The Oxford Club should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. The information found on this website may only be used pursuant to the membership or subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of The Oxford Club, 105 W. Monument Street, Baltimore MD 21201.