[LaineyGossip.com - Calling all smuthounds!]
Friday, April 22, 2016
[Intro for April 22, 2016]
[Lin-Manuel Miranda covers TIME Magazine for Most 100 Influential People feature ]
Dear Gossips,
TIME Magazine released its list of the 100 Most Influential yesterday. As you know, the list is divided into 5 categories: Pioneers, Titans, Artists, Leaders, and Icons. And, to me, what’s more interesting than the list itself is how they group the people on the list and under which headings. Lin-Manuel Miranda was on one of the five covers, grouped as a Pioneer. Totally. As for the Icons? Consider the word, ICON. We heard it used a lot yesterday in sadness, and deservedly so. On the list of TIME’s Icons was golfer Jordan Spieth. Jordan Spieth is a great golfer. And given how destroyed he was after giving up his lead at the Masters a couple of weeks ago, with that kind of motivation, there’s no doubt he’s going to become an even greater golfer, maybe even a legendary golfer. But right now? It’s 2016. He’s 22 years old. He’s won two majors. Is he really an Icon yet? Rory McIlroy is 26 years old and he’s won 4 majors, one of only three players (Jack Nicklaus and Tiger Woods are the others) to have won at least 3 by the age of 25. He’s never been on TIME’s list of Most Influential People. Before you start huffing, I’m not here to drag Jordan Spieth. He’s talented and very nice and will hopefully continue to elevate his game. I’m just saying maybe we should take it easy on throwing an Icon label on people so that we can actually preserve the definition of the word Icon.
An Icon was honoured on Broadway last night. Videos are below.
Have a great weekend full of Lemonade and Dragons.
Yours in gossip,
Lainey
[Click here for the rest of the photos.]
Posted at 1:33 PM
[Lemonade & Dragons]
[Natalie Dormer and Rose Leslie attend the Kate Spade New York Regent Street store opening on April 21, 2016 in London, England]
Are you ready? It's a big weekend. I've been waiting for Saturday for days, maybe even all year. [Beyoncé]'s "world premiere event", Lemonade, premieres on HBO tomorrow at 9pm. HBO has confirmed it's an hour. But there are reports that even HBO hasn't seen it yet. Some are speculating that Beyoncé is such a boss that she won't deliver Lemonade to them until the day of. I really, really want that to be true. I really can't see it being true because it would leave HBO wide open to so much risk. That said, if there’s anyone worth taking a risk on, it’s Beyoncé.
Aside from Beyoncé, HBO is premiering Veep and Game Of Thrones this weekend –and for free. Since, for me, everything comes back to Beyoncé, I feel like she was the catalyst for this. It can’t be an “event” unless the maximum mass potential can be accessed. Everyone will be talking about her Saturday night, through Sunday morning and afternoon. And then we head to Westeros. Thank you for your email responses all week. You are overwhelmingly in favour of weekly recaps. So for the next 10 weeks, those will be the first posts on Monday mornings.
Here are [Rose Leslie] and [Natalie Dormer] at a Kate Spade event last night and [Nikolaj Coster-Waldau] over at Kimmel.
[Click here for the rest of the photos.]
Posted at 7:59 PM
[Smutty Social Media, April 22, 2016]
[Leonardo DiCaprio speaks during the Paris Agreement For Climate Change Signing at United Nations on April 22, 2016 in New York City]
Pamela Anderson is bringing CJ back for the Baywatch movie. The Rock’s hashtags kill me. I looked up smokestack on the Urban Dictionary (because I’ve never heard anyone use it in this context, in conversation or in writing) and it said, “very hot woman who sparks instant arousal upon viewing.” Do people besides The Rock use this phrase?
[She introduced the world to "CJ Parker" and became one of the most iconic characters of a generation - for the most successful TV show of all time. A pleasure to welcome (as gorgeous as ever) Pamela Anderson to our #BAYWATCH cast. We couldn't have made this movie without you. Welcome home. Thrilled you had a blast with us! #BAYWATCH MAY 19, 2017. #PamAnderson #OS #OriginalSmokestack]
A photo posted by therock (@therock) on
Apr 21, 2016 at 8:10pm PDT
Leo is back at the UN and his suit pants look weird. But his face side profile is not bad considering the de-bloat time needed after Coachella.
[Honored to be part of this historic first step alongside Ban Ki-moon and so many world leaders. Now is the time for bold unprecedented action. Watch live: #ParisAgreement]
A photo posted by Leonardo DiCaprio (@leonardodicaprio) on
Apr 22, 2016 at 6:46am PDT
The NYT [did a story] on Brett Ratner’s Instagram feed – it is very mentor-related.
[No time better spent then picking the brain of a #Legend #KirkDouglas Only 99 years young!]
A photo posted by Brett Ratner (@brettrat) on
Apr 22, 2016 at 7:20am PDT
Cher and Susan Sarandon are not taking the feud bait. Susan needs a rest from social media fighting.
[@BravoWWHL] Don't believe Susan would say,I Said"I have a hard time being in a scene that's not about me"1st Its not true.& 2nd I love Susan
— Cher (@cher) [April 22, 2016]
.[@cher]'s most Cher-like thing she did on the set of "The Witches of Eastwick" is everything! [#WWHL] [pic.twitter.com/d9BWI0hx3H]
— Bravo WWHL (@BravoWWHL) [April 22, 2016]
So much love & respect 4U. Devastated was taken as anything else. Also said how much I wish I had balls 2 say same. [
— Susan Sarandon (@SusanSarandon) [April 22, 2016]
If you’ve ever wanted Adrian Grenier on top of you, today is your day. I won’t judge. (Yes I will).
[Let's #earthday it up, together.]
A video posted by Adrian Grenier (@adriangrenier) on
Apr 22, 2016 at 9:26am PDT
Lena and Jack are 4 years in.
[4 years today. Thank you @jackantonoff- you down for 4 more? â¤ï¸]
A photo posted by Lena Dunham (@lenadunham) on
Apr 22, 2016 at 6:34am PDT
Do you think Live! will film Kelly and Michael saying goodbye separately and then splice it together like The Good Wife? What f-ckery.
[@goodmorningamerica @robinrobertsgma @gstephanopoulos @laraspencerabc @ajrobach @ginger_zee As you can see I'm excited to be back to the family at GMA! George is ready to go! Haha]
A photo posted by michaelstrahan (@michaelstrahan) on
Apr 13, 2016 at 4:33am PDT
We remember the music, of course. But it was the extra. The everything. “Prettier than Beyoncé, cockier than Kanye, balled like MJ…”
[AND #POW #RIPPrince #Repost @susiesnohomemaker ........I couldn't have said it better myself.]
A photo posted by taraji p henson (@tarajiphenson) on
Apr 21, 2016 at 5:32pm PDT
[Click here for the rest of the photos.]
Posted at 7:29 PM
[My Obsessionâs next move]
[Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Sam Taylor-Johnson attend the 40th anniversary screening of 'Taxi Driver' at Beacon Theatre during the 2016 Tribeca Film Festival on April 21, 2016 in New York City]
My Obsession, [Sam] and [Aaron Taylor-Johnson], were in New York last night for the 40th anniversary of Taxi Driver at the Tribeca Film Festival. His hair is lighter now, right? It looks lighter to me. And he looks SO hot to me.
In other Obsession news, Sam is confirmed for her next directing job. She’ll be working with Netflix, executive producing new series called Gypsy. [Naomi Watts] was just confirmed to star this week in the show about a therapist who gets personally and intimately involved in the lives of her clients. Sam will also direct the first two episodes, presumably to set the tone. And the tone?
I mean there’s definitely a sexual undercurrent to that show description and, as we know, she did what she could with the sexual currents in Fifty Shades Of Grey. It’s a good fit for her aesthetic, I think. And I can’t wait to see how she and Naomi work together.
[Highline NY @samtaylorjohnson]
A photo posted by Aaron Taylor-Johnson (@aarontaylorjohnson) on
Apr 22, 2016 at 10:56am PDT
[Click here for the rest of the photos.]
Posted at 6:22 PM
[Kevin Costner in Criminal]
[Kevin Costner attends the 'Criminal' New York Premiere at AMC Loews Lincoln Square 13 theater on April 11, 2016 in New York City]
Somehow, incredibly, in the span of less than one year, [Ryan Reynolds] appears in the same bad movie, twice. Last summer I had to sit through the [mind-numbingly bad Self/Less], in which Reynold stars as a body-swapped action hero, and I just sat through the soul-crushing nothing of Criminal, in which he is the body-swapper and [Kevin Costner] is the action hero. If we’re going to bring body-swap movies back, can we at least use the convention as it is intended, for wacky odd couple comedies? Someone should make a body-swap comedy starring The Rock and Melissa McCarthy. That’s the only body-swap movie I’m interested in seeing. Any other body-swap movie can get bent, especially if they persist in being as bad as Self/Less, and now Criminal.
Costner stars as Jericho Stewart, the first of several characters who got their name out of a Scrabble bag. Jericho has brain damage that makes it impossible for him to feel emotions or distinguish right from wrong, so he’s a complete lunatic. Saying “He’s a complete lunatic” is motivation enough without going into the medical babble no one cares about anyway in a movie like this, but whatever. Reynolds stars in a small part as Bill Pope, a CIA agent who dies before giving up where he stashed a computer hacker, don’t yell at me about spoilers you’re never going to watch this movie. At 113 minutes, Criminal is 113 minutes too long.
[Gary Oldman] pops up as a CIA station chief in London named Quaker Wells, which is such a movie name he might as well be called Movie McMovieson. QUAKER has the bright idea to graft Pope’s brain waves onto Jericho’s brain for reasons that don’t make any sense, oh god I’m wasting my life. And then [Tommy Lee Jones] shows up as the neuroscientist who wants to graft brains and he’s called Dr. Franks as in Frankenstein and Jones looks super mad that he’s even in this movie to begin with.
Naturally, Jericho escapes custody and then Criminal becomes the worst of all Jason Bourne knock-offs as he races around London trying to complete Pope’s last mission which is all about a computer hacker with a program that will let him hack nuclear codes. This is a hard truth of cinema: If your movie features a computer hacker with a key to hack the planet, YOUR MOVIE IS BAD. THIS MOVIE IS BAD. Michael Pitt plays the hacker that everyone calls “The Dutchman” and just once I’d like to see a movie where the hacker is called like, Bob.
Jericho keeps experiencing flashes of Pope’s life so he goes to Pope’s house where he meets Pope’s family which is an excuse to put [Gal Gadot] in the movie as Pope’s wife. She is terrible but the movie is terrible so I don’t want to hold it against her please god let Wonder Woman be good. It turns out that Pope was an objectively awful CIA agent because he hid the computer hacker in his wife’s office at work. Everyone in Criminal behaves as though their brains are made of garbage.
Most of the movie is just these garbage-brained assholes running around London screaming incoherently at each other. The director, Ariel Vromen, previously made The Iceman, which is a pretty decent movie about serial killers, and in that Vromen showed some ability with actors and also staging. And to be fair, Criminal doesn’t look that bad. Vromen gets nowhere with the actors, all of whom act like they’re in different movies, but at least it’s technically competent.
That’s my pull quote for Criminal: Technically competent. There is no reason to ever see this movie.
Attached below - Kevin Costner at the New York premiere of Criminal earlier this month.
[Click here for the rest of the photos.]
Posted at 5:33 PM
[Gwynethâs new #1]
[Gwyneth Paltrow, wearing Bally, attends Bally Dinner, celebrating Beverly Hills flagship store opening in support of Communities in Schools, on April 21, 2016 in Los Angeles, California]
[Gwyneth Paltrow]’s It’s All Easy has debuted at #1 on the New York Times Bestsellers List which was just updated today. She’s done that before but It’s All Easy is the first book under her own imprint. So, you know, I wanted to warn you that she has something else to add to her success list and brag about:
Her Oscar
Her friends
Her business
Her books
Her style
Her body
Her most amicable Hollywood divorce
Her most ideal, unicorn post-divorce boyfriend…because, as I wrote a few weeks ago ([click here] for a refresher) she’s the 40-something single mother of two who found a 40-something single father of two with a proper career who cooks and pays the bills and supports her…
And he was with her last night at the Bally Flagship opening in LA not wearing his pants very well. Maybe she can help with that although, for some reason, she was dressed for autumn.
[Source]
[Click here for the rest of the photos.]
Posted at 4:25 PM
[Tom Hiddleston is no longer the internetâs boyfriend]
[Tom Hiddleston at the 2016 Tribeca Film Festival screening of 'High Rise' at the SVA Theater, April 20, 2016]
[Tom Hiddleston] has been promoting things for the last few months, from I Saw the Light to The Night Manager—[which is good]—to High Rise, premiering on demand at the end of the month. I commented earlier this year that it seems like, on his current promotional run, we’re getting a [more subdued], less accessible Hiddleston, and now Vulture is also noticing that his days as “the internet’s boyfriend” are behind him. That’s fine. That type of hype won’t last forever—the internet is a fickle bitch—and it’s always interesting to watch actors transition through the phases of their careers. It’s just that Saint Tom the Huge Dork was so fun.
The Vulture piece is all about how Hiddleston has shifted his public persona, drawing back from his rabid internet fandom and courting more mature audiences with stuff like The Night Manager and High Rise. He side-steps the question about his relationship with Elizabeth Olsen (“There’s no ring on this finger.”), and quotes Alan Rickman on the opacity of actors: “If you want to know who I am, it’s all in the work.” There is a very definite wall around Hiddleston now. It’s not just no-commenting his love life—that’s fine, whatever dude—it’s that his personality seems carefully tucked away, so as not to give anyone anything to talk about.
His dancing days are done, and though he won’t ever live them down entirely—fickle it may be, but the internet also never forgets—he’s obviously anxious to distance himself from that time in his life when he enjoyed being successful and popular. We’ve now entered the “Ugh, I’m just here to ACT” phase. So this is our new Tom Hiddleston: Grown up, noncommittal on anything that smacks of controversy, and a little precious about his persona. “I should just dance on talk shows,” he says at the end of the interview. “It’s much more interesting, isn’t it?” I mean…yeah.
[Source]
Attached - Tom Hiddleston at the Tribeca Film Festival screening of High Rise this week.
[Click here for the rest of the photos.]
Posted at 4:05 PM
[JLO for a nomination?]
[Jennifer Lopez attends SAG-AFTRA Foundation Conversations with Jennifer Lopez for 'Shades Of Blue' at SAG-AFTRA Foundation on April 21, 2016 in Los Angeles, California]
[Jennifer Lopez] participated in an event for her show Shades Of Blue at the SAG-AFTRA Foundation in LA yesterday. At first, when I was just looking at the pictures, without fully processing the caption, I was like, the Shades Of Blue season is over. Why is she still promoting it?
And then I remembered a couple of articles I read a few weeks ago at [THR] and [EW] and it totally makes sense. Because they think she might have a shot at an Emmy nomination. And then, later on, maybe, a Golden Globe and a SAG nomination. We’re still 3 months away from when the Emmy nominations will be announced but she’s doing her work now, to build the goodwill, especially since, considering the field, she’d be considered an underdog. Viola Davis, Kerry Washington, Robin Wright, Claire Danes, Maggie Smith, Julianna Margulies, Taraji P Henson – that’s who she’d be up against, if this is what her motivation is. And, well, what else could it be?
PS. JLO received a gift the other day – from [Rihanna]. When does she wear them out in public, if at all?
[@badgalriri Thank you soooomuch for these incredibly sick ass boots!! #Rihanna #manolos #loveher #thebaddest]
A photo posted by Jennifer Lopez (@jlo) on
Apr 20, 2016 at 4:41pm PDT
[Click here for the rest of the photos.]
Posted at 3:29 PM
[The Huntsman: Winterâs War is so bad itâs weird]
[Charlize Theron, Chris Hemsworth, Emily Blunt and Jessica Chastain promote The Huntsman: Winter's War during an appearance on CBS's 'The Late Late Show with James Corden.' ]
I don’t think anyone actually expected The Huntsman: Winter’s War to be good, and it isn’t, so I’m not going to demand anyone spend money on this movie. But if you’re the curious type and/or you remember the charmingly bad sword-and-sorcery movies of yesterday, like Willow and Legend—or the better but still f*cking weird entries into the genre, like The Last Unicorn—then The Huntsman: Winter’s War offers a sort of nostalgia-infused trip back to a time when Hollywood liked making movies with magic and beasties, and was also doing copious amounts of blow in the bathroom.
The movie begins with narration provided, inexplicably, by Liam Neeson. The purpose of the narration is to connect Huntsman to Snow White and the Huntsman, and then take us into the past, so Huntsman is a prequel. We go back in time and learn that the evil queen Ravenna ([Charlize Theron]) had a sister, Freya ([Emily Blunt]), who was too in love to be evil, or something. So Ravenna does a Very Bad Thing in order to wake up the magic inside Freya, and the result is that Freya turns into Evil Elsa and promptly goes north to found her ice kingdom where she kidnaps children and makes them be her child soldiers.
Her best child soldiers—or “huntsmen”, even though they don’t hunt and aren’t all men—are Eric and Sara, and props to the casting department for finding a couple kids who actually look like they could grow up to be [Chris Hemsworth] and [Jessica Chastain]. Which is what they do, and we learn that the Huntsman’s name is Eric, and he’s in love with ginger Sara. They have a terrible plan to run away together that does not work out because at this point the movie decides it wants to be a sequel instead so we need to jump seven years into the future.
In the future, Snow White is queen and married to Sam Claflin but the magic mirror is driving her crazy, so she sent it to be thrown away in the magic forest, except it got stolen while in transit, and Eric is dispatched to find the mirror. And this is where Huntsman gets weird-bad in a kind of fun way. Eric hooks up with a couple dwarves (Nick Frost, returning from Snow White, and Rob Brydon, a new addition), and they set off, gallivanting across the magic kingdom looking for the mirror. And it’s fun! Hemsworth is loose and affable as Eric, and he’s got good comedic chemistry with Brydon and Frost. This portion of the movie is actually quite enjoyable.
In short order they encounter not-so-dead Sara and now there’s the added dynamic of Eric and Sara working out their sh*t while searching for the mirror, and it’s still pretty fun. Don’t get me wrong—it’s stupid as sh*t and not at all difficult to figure out what’s really going on. But there’s just enough energy and action to keep things moving in a mostly entertaining way.
And my god is this movie gorgeous to look at. Colleen Atwood’s costumes are STUNNING, and the production design from Dominic Watkins benefits from Huntsman having a lighter, less dour tone than Snow White. And director Cedric Nicolas-Troyan, promoted from VFX supervisor on Snow White, creates some decent shots and handles the action well. And if you like ponies, there are some really pretty ones in the first half of the movie. Aesthetically there’s something for everyone.
But it can’t maintain the momentum and Huntsman falls apart in act three. The ensemble is split up so you lose the fun banter, and the big showdown between Freya and Ravenna is mostly just Blunt and Theron pointing at each other while CGI happens around them. And Freya only rides her polar bear once, which is a waste of weirdness. The whole movie should have been Freya on a polar bear.
That’s the biggest problem with Huntsman—it’s not weird enough. If you’re going to make a movie where a lady rides a polar bear, just go whole hog and have a lady riding a polar bear all the time. The movie flirts with being a camp classic but ultimately it doesn’t push hard enough to become true camp. Instead it settles for being a half-baked movie made for no real reason, and one that, despite the obvious skill of the craftspeople who worked on it, never really justifies its own existence. Huntsman feels like a movie that resulted from a three-day bender—it probably sounded like a good idea at one point, but no one can remember exactly why.
Attached - The Hunstman cast on James Corden last night.
[Click here for the rest of the photos.]
Posted at 3:05 PM
[Could it be Amy Adams?]
[Amy Adams at the Opening of 'Refugee' exhibit at the Annenberg Space for Photography in Los Angeles, April 21, 2016]
Have you been keeping up with The Guardian’s Secret Actress series? I first posted about it right before the Oscars – [click here] for a refresher. After the first two installments, to be honest, I stopped paying attention. I think it’s because I’m too shallow and, well, the essays weren’t salacious enough. Like if you’re cloaking the feature with the description the “Secret Actress”, there’s a level of expectation for the material to warrant why she has to be so secretive – at least to me.
Anyway, a few of you have messaged me about the latest piece, published this week. It’s about sex scenes between co-stars. And now you’re leaning in, now we’re getting somewhere…right? Wellllll. Then she talks about how awkward it is, to shoot a love scene in front of the whole crew and one time an actor pre-apologised for if his dick got hard because your body can’t distinguish between “real” and “acting” and I feel like we’ve heard it all before. But if you haven’t, [click here] to read it.
The reason I’m bringing it up, however, is because I received several emails from people trying to guess who it is and some of you have Amy Adams on your list and Amy Adams stepped out last night in LA which made me think of it. I like Amy Adams. And so does Joanna – [click here] for her last post. As we’ve mentioned before though, she’s not Duana’s favourite. She explained why last year – [click here] if you missed that.
If Amy Adams is the Secret Actress? That would certainly make her a lot more interesting. That would certainly suggest a subversive side to Amy Adams. But would the subversive Secret Actress wear this dress in this colour?
[Click here for the rest of the photos.]
Posted at 2:27 PM
[The Legend of Pete Harris]
[Scandal Season 5 Episode 18 ]
Scandal Season 5 Episode 18 recap
I have decided that there are two ways to respond to and recap this episode, and so after careful consideration, I’m doing them both. Here we go…
Who CARES?
At this point, who cares anymore? Okay, so Olivia is a pouty, mentally unstable teenager at home in her childhood bedroom, decorated in a way time forgot, with posters of Dead Poet’s Society and TLC (and Prince…I still can’t believe it), but also a Fisher Price tape recorder front and centre. Oh wait, no she’s not – it’s all an act. Okay, but how do we trust her anymore? Every time we see Olivia, or Jake in the present day, they’re ciphers. We’re not sure if we’re supposed to know them or whether they’re smarter than us, whether the secrets they have are real factors for us to consider (like the former Pete Harris’ home life, and the things that ultimately made him become Jake Ballard and B6-13), or just elaborately woven stories, like the ostensibly fatherly things Rowan says to Olivia. “You love Adams Morgan”, he tells her, like a father who knows, who loves his daughter. Like a person.
But what does it matter that Olivia is pulling one over on them when Rowan wins everything, every time? Olivia is all set with what she thinks is a perfect plan, and she gets outsmarted by the cartoonishly evil Rowan, who will slit his throat. No matter what Olivia does, Rowan will slit Jake’s throat. She can’t move, she has no recourse, because Rowan will slit Jake’s throat.
So what’s the point here? She’s tried to best him before and has failed, he reminds her of that often, she’s crushed by him and has no new plans, so what’s the point?
Furthermore, what’s the point of these huge ‘I don’t love you’ speeches? The drama and the unnecessarily vitriolic speech? We’ve just been told all episode that Olivia puts on these elaborate performances. That she can do that. So why should Jake even listen to the abuse, as though it will make it more real? Obviously she’s just repeating the patterns Rowan has taught her over the years, but who believes it any more? More importantly, who cares? Rowan is insurmountable, Olivia isn’t allowed to be happy. It’s felt the same since season 3. Why do we still care? Or is the not-so-secret-truth that we really, really don’t?
That’s one way of looking at it. Here’s the other:
Prodigal Children
Now we know. Now we know how Jake became Jake, why he’s so indebted to (or yoked to) Rowan, why he’s marrying the incredibly bland and boring Vanessa (and correct me if I’m wrong, but shouldn’t she be younger? If he’s going to be the perfect Vice President shouldn’t there be the impending delightful possibility of Vice Children sometime soon?).
But we also know where he came from, and more to the point, what he’s capable of. He killed his father. In case you didn’t get that, let me type it again.
He killed his father.
Get it? He’s the one. He’s the only one who can actually stop Rowan—combined, of course, with Olivia, his actual flesh and blood, who will have the ultimate connection that needs to be severed, like Harry Potter and Voldemort. Something she hasn’t been able to do in the past. The opportunity has come up at least once before, at the hands of some of Olivia’s henchmen, but now we know the truth.
Now that we’ve seen Olivia kill, and we’ve known Jake to kill, now we know the truth.
The only way to stop Rowan—and this episode proves, as if it needed more proving, that he needs to be stopped—is at the hands of his children, Olivia and Jake. While everyone else was praising the set design of Olivia’s room (and it’s amazing, no doubt) I kept thinking about how much Rowan would still love her if she would just be his little girl. If she would just not have grown up to be suspicious of him, he would still be the loving father she always knew. Eli of the Smithsonian.
Now Jake’s doing the same thing, or at least we know he has the potential to do so. To grow up, stop eating food ostentatiously, and stop the man who’s making him unhappy. He has the ability to do so. Olivia has the ability to do so. They have to do it, or else nobody gets to move forward and have a productive life of free will.
So…do they do it?
Those are my conflicting feelings. Obviously, I thought of one before the other, but I really want the second to be true. What about you…what do you think?
[Click here for the rest of the photos.]
Posted at 2:02 PM
[April 22, 2016 â Smutty Shout-Outs]
[Idris Elba for M]
"Happy Birthday M from S, can't wait to see when I come back to van”. By request, here’s Idris Elba and Fantastic Beasts.
[Click here for the rest of the photos.]
Posted at 1:52 PM
[Privacy Policy] - [Unsubscribe]