Newsletter Subject

The Battle to Preserve Federal Funding for Public Media Begins

From

kqed.org

Email Address

newsletter@email.kqed.org

Sent On

Fri, Mar 17, 2017 03:07 PM

Email Preheader Text

If you are having trouble reading this email, . The Battle to Preserve Federal Funding for Public Me

If you are having trouble reading this email, [read the online version](. The Battle to Preserve Federal Funding for Public Media Begins Dear Loyal KQED Supporter, As you may know, the Trump administration just released a 2018 fiscal-year budget outline that calls for the elimination of funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB). The CPB is the largest source of funding for public media in the country, and its survival is critical for KQED and our sister public media stations across the country. To quote Patricia Harrison, president and CEO of the CPB, "There is no viable substitute for federal funding that ensures Americans have universal access to public media's educational and informational programming and services. The elimination of federal funding to CPB would initially devastate and ultimately destroy public media's role in early childhood education, public safety, connecting citizens to our history, and promoting civil discussions — all for Americans in both rural and urban communities." While the news from Washington is alarming, it is not a surprise. Public media leaders, including me, have been preparing for this moment by lobbying members of Congress and building bipartisan alliances. The President's budget is only the first phase of a long process to determine the final budget. In the end, it's up to Congress to decide which aspects of the President's budget are enacted or not. Federal funding for the CPB has been challenged before. President George W. Bush eliminated funding for public media in the budget he sent to Congress for eight straight years, and in each of those years Congress restored funding. This is not to say that the danger to cutting off federal funding for public media is not great, but it does indicate that with vigorous, vocal public support, we can protect this irreplaceable public resource. So what can you do now to show your support and keep informed as the process unfolds? Join [Protect My Public Media]( and urge anyone who cares and benefits from public media to do the same. Many thanks for your continued support of KQED and public media, and your help in joining us in this fight! Sincerely, John L. Boland President, KQED [Unsubscribe]( from this email or [manage all]( of your email subscriptions. KQED, 2601 Mariposa Street, San Francisco, CA 94110 tel: (415) 864-2000 Copyright © 2017 [KQED](. All Rights Reserved. [Privacy Policy](

Marketing emails from kqed.org

View More
Sent On

03/11/2021

Sent On

28/09/2019

Sent On

27/09/2019

Sent On

25/09/2019

Sent On

24/09/2019

Sent On

24/09/2019

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.