Newsletter Subject

What Type of Fuel Will Really Supply the Electric Vehicle Revolution?

From

katusaresearch.com

Email Address

katusa@katusaresearch.com

Sent On

Fri, Dec 15, 2017 02:19 PM

Email Preheader Text

Katusa's Investment Insights December 15, 2017 What Type of Fuel Will Really Supply the Electric Veh

Katusa's Investment Insights December 15, 2017 What Type of Fuel Will Really Supply the Electric Vehicle Revolution? By Marin Katusa Dear Katusa Research reader, I just sat down for an interview with Erik Townson of the popular podcast Macro Voices. If you’re not familiar with the podcast, Erik is a hedge fund manager that gets some very solid guests on his show, like bond expert Lacy Hunt, fund manager Hugh Hendry, author and fund manager Jim Rogers, and my friend Rick Rule. I’m proud to have my name on Erik’s roster of guests. Several friends and colleagues listened to the interview or read its transcript and really enjoyed it. Erik and I covered a variety of important topic, like oil, uranium, Vladimir Putin, and electric vehicles. You can catch the entire interview (link is below), but in this email, I’ve included a “quick hit” series of comments that my team thought were the interview’s key points. You’ll find them below. ***On the topic of electric vehicle adoption and what type of fuel will supply the electricity they’ll require: Marin: The West, the developed world – America (let’s focus on that) has about, I don’t know, I think it’s around somewhere between 750 to 800 cars per every thousand people on the road. Let’s step away from talking about the West right now and let’s go to China, where they have less than 100 cars per every thousand. And let’s now goto somewhere like India. I spent a lot of time with the energy minister in India and we spent a lot of time talking about this. They have less than 20 cars per thousand on the roads. But let’s look at their infrastructure. It is very poor infrastructure as is, and the government now is realizing that they can bypass the whole combustion engine the way a lot of India, Africa, and China has bypassed wired communications. For example, they didn’t have to do the telephones the traditional way. They just adopted the cell phone, the rapid adoption of the cell phone. If you take a look at what is going on in China, they are investing hundreds of billions of dollars into exactly this. And, more importantly, they are mandating these changes. So if you want to be an SEO or fund it and loan to take debt money from the government – if you’re a car company you have to have so many focus. So now everyone’s focusing on these batteries and how they’re going to make them better. And whether it can be salts, lithium, cobalt – there’ll be problems with that because there’s just not enough cobalt to meet the demand. But who says that the winner of all this has to be a battery? I’ve written about this. What if it’s like a propane gas tank where you own the car but whichever, Tesla, or the future cars – if you go to India let’s say it’s Tata Motors, and China, any of the vehicles – and you pull up to the electric station and it’s like, just replace the battery? And it’s about as long as the time to fill up your gas, let’s say less than three or four minutes, and you’re off with a new battery that’s charged. Why do we need to figure out a grid that’s going to be a very different grid than what everyone’s applying to today? That type of scenario is going to be much easier to adopt in India, in China, in the developing parts of the world than it would be in, let’s say, downtown New York, or downtown Toronto, or LA, where you already have an infrastructure complex. Now let’s go back to what will happen in the West. To take this massive adoption, it’s going to be almost going back to the original battle between Tesla and Edison – alternating current versus direct current – and everyone knows that Tesla was proven right. But now it’s almost going to go back to that “wait a second.” For the success of the electric vehicles in many parts of the world, we’re going to go back to Edison’s strategy of the source of the power, where it gets charged up. Power stations within the city where, for example, you’re going to have driverless vehicles, things are going to be optimized so that when you park your car or get dropped off at your work, who says that it can’t go and get the batteries at some station that’s in the city? We don’t know what the exact solution is going to be, and I don’t try to pretend. I’ve written about all the different possible battery combinations that everyone’s working on. And I say it’s kind of like we’re still at the Palm Pilot. The Blackberry is just coming in. And the iPhone wasn’t even invented yet. We’re like in 2004 in the phone revolution here. Let’s give it another 10 years, and it’s going to be an adoption that’s going to be much faster on a percentage adoption in the developing world, in India and – and remember it’s going to be a different type of vehicle. In India you’re not going to have the SUV type of vehicle. When you go to New Delhi for example, all of the cars are mandated to be CNG, which is compressed natural gas. They don’t burn gasoline in the cities and they still have huge pollution issues. And over 45% of the power is coal, as you mentioned. The governments there have a lot more power to mandate change than they do in the West, because the infrastructure is completely government-dependent. So, like in Mumbai, and all of the infrastructure that is required, it’s going to be set up. India is putting over $50 billion just into their airports. And it’s a gong show. When I was down in Mumbai, there was a brand new airport, but it’s still not big enough to handle all of the chaos in India. Everyone’s tripping over one another. You go to China, same thing. This is a very real term evolution, but it’s going to happen. And that’s where the cars are moving forward. And, more importantly, if you’re a Volkswagen in the West, say, you look at what are some of the biggest costs for these vehicles. A combustion engine vehicle has over 2,000 moving parts, where an electric vehicle has less than 200. That’s a lot simpler to replace. And you look at an electric vehicle – if you compare a gas-powered engine to a diesel, a diesel is about twice as long lifespan. Electric vehicle is about three to four times what a diesel is. There’s a lot more efficiencies for someone like Volkswagen, who’s broken the law and they’re going to be fined significantly, where they can now get rid of the unions, or reduce the dependence on the unions for labor and all these different aspects. I really do believe that the electric vehicle revolution is real. The adoption rates are going to be much faster in the developing world because there’s so much more low-hanging fruit. And they can develop their infrastructure in line with the adoption of the electric vehicle, whereas they didn’t predesign it to the combustion engine. I think that makes sense. ***On the state and future of uranium and the nuclear energy market: Marin: [In the U.S., nuclear is] still 18–20% percent of baseload power, post-Fukushima. The Achilles’ heel of the nuclear sector, of the uranium renaissance, is the fact that the current designs of these reactors are just too expensive. It’s too big of an upfront cost for anyone to put on their balance sheet. The price of uranium is irrelevant to the cost of nuclear electricity. It really is. By the time you permit these things – an $8 billion reactor complex ends up becoming twice as long and somewhere between $15–$18 billion. Companies like Westinghouse have gone down because of these cost overruns. Toshiba had to get government help because of these cost overruns. These are big, big cost overruns. I guess the answer to your question is I also believe the future of nuclear will have to change where the upfront costs are smaller, whether it’s pebble-bed reactors or smaller modules, I think, rather than 2,000–3,000 megawatt projects. Will we ever see a scenario where it’s a 250 megawatt nuclear reactor and the costs aren’t just one-tenth of that, they’re one-fiftieth of that? I think that’s where it will go. That’s where it will have to go. In China, it’s a bit of a different story than the cost overruns in the West. Because, again, it’s the government backing it. So, you look at a place like India that has less than 2% of their baseload power from nuclear, they want to get to where America is, at 20%. Same as China. They’re less than 5% today. They want to get to 25% and they’ve planned and financed 70 reactors to come online. So, uranium and nuclear energy, it’s not going to disappear. But, you know, you have a lot of stockpiles built up. There’s about four or five years of above-ground stockpile. For the price of uranium to get going you’re probably going to have to see 20 to 25 – to get the price of uranium to double you’ll have to see 25 reactors come online globally. And the key question here is what will the Americans do with their nuclear warheads? What the USSR – in 1992 and the collapse of the Soviet Union, they down-blended their nuclear warheads to make nuclear energy. That was an agreement signed here in Vancouver, Canada between the Americans and the Russians. Now, there’s not a chance Putin – in my book I said there’s not a chance he’s going to ever redo that type of contract because it made no sense for the Russians. At the time, under Boris Yeltsin, they were bankrupt and they needed what they could get. But, I ask you, will the Americans down-blend their nuclear warheads to create nuclear power? I say no. Secondly, the infrastructure is not in place in America. It would take about $20 billion of infrastructure to be able to create a complex to do so. But if the Americans did say, hey, let’s down-blend 10% of our nuclear warheads to create some HEU to LEU, they would have to send their nuclear reactors to Russia to get that done. I just don’t see that scenario. -Marin To listen to the entire podcast at Macro Voices - [click here](. Or read the whole pdf transcript of Marin and Erik’s Q&A - [right here](. Big Ideas We’re Covering Now Get up to speed on where Marin sees huge opportunities. Below are the most important trends and opportunities we’re tracking right now. My 2018 Uranium Outlook: Two Major Catalysts Change the Game Two recent catalysts have re-ignited interest in the uranium sector. The price of uranium has jumped in the last month and stocks have rallied off their multi-year lows. Here’s what happened…Read the full story [here](. The Greatest Bubble of All Time Will Get Bigger: Prepare Yourself and Your Money for the Coming Currency Wars The greatest currency war of all time is upon us. For years speculators chose the Russian Ruble or the Chinese Yen as the next global currency, but a new front-runner is rapidly emerging. Read the full story [here](. The Most Important Quality You Must Have to Achieve Investment Success The man who thinks he knows everything knows nothing. However, to succeed in business and the stock market, you must have the courage to act… the courage that comes from self-confidence. Read the full story [here](. Katusa's Education Center Make Bigger, Safer Profits by Advancing Your Knowledge of the Resource Sector Katusa Research is committed to helping individual investors learn how to navigate the complex investment world. To that end, we’ve created a large amount of educational material that can help anyone become a smarter, better investor. To access these valuable materials for free in [Katusa’s Education Center](. Published by Katusa Research. © 2017 Katusa Research, 530-800 West Pender St, Vancouver BC, Canada. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from the publisher. Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. It is not designed to meet your personal situation – we are not financial advisors nor do we give personalized advice. The opinions expressed herein are those of the publisher and are subject to change without notice. It may become outdated and there is no obligation to update any such information. Recommendations in Katusa Research publications should be made only after consulting with your advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. You shouldn't make any decision based solely on what you read here. Katusa Research writers and publications do not take compensation in any form for covering those securities or commodities. Katusa Research and agents of Katusa Research and its affiliate companies must wait 24 hours before following an initial recommendation published on the Internet Copyright © 2017 Katusa Research, All rights reserved. Our mailing address is: Katusa Research Suite 530-800 W. Pender St.Vancouver, Bc V6C2V6 Canada [Add us to your address book](//katusaresearch.us10.list-manage.com/vcard?u=a34b101c645e07666a65ff377&id=7156b08310) Want to change how you receive these emails? You can [update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe from this list](

EDM Keywords (265)

written would world working work winner whole whether west way want wait volkswagen vehicles vehicle variety ussr uranium update unsubscribe unions type twice try tripping transcript topic today time three thinks think things thing tesla telephones talking take supply success succeed subject strategy stocks still station state spent speed source somewhere set seo sense send see securities secondly second scenario says say sat said russians russia roster roads right reviewing required replace remember reliable reduce redistribution receive really realizing real read reactors rallied question putting put pull publisher publications proud prospectus problems price pretend preferences predesign power planned place permit part park optimized opportunities obtained obligation nuclear needed need navigate name must mumbai much money mentioned meet marin mandating mandated man make made lot look long loan listen list line like leu let less law labor la knowledge know kind katusa jumped irrelevant iphone interview infrastructure india included importantly heu happen handle guess guaranteed grid governments government gone going go give gets get future fund fuel free four form following focusing focus find fill figure familiar fact expensive example exactly everyone erik end emails email electricity efficiencies edison double done dollars disappear diesel develop designed dependence demand created create covering covered courage costs cost contract consulting complex compare company committed comments coming comes collapse coal cng city cities china charged chaos changes change chance catch cars car bypass business broken book blended blend blackberry bit billions big better believe battery batteries bankrupt ask applying anyone answer americans america already airports agents advisor advancing adoption adopted adopt act access able 750 45 25 2004 200 20 1992

Marketing emails from katusaresearch.com

View More
Sent On

29/11/2024

Sent On

01/11/2024

Sent On

31/10/2024

Sent On

30/10/2024

Sent On

25/10/2024

Sent On

21/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.