Newsletter Subject

How to Profit Following the "Dumb Money"

From

jeffclarktrader.com

Email Address

service@exct.jeffclarktrader.com

Sent On

Fri, Aug 3, 2018 11:32 AM

Email Preheader Text

How to Profit Following the "Dumb Money" Over the past month or so, I?ve the trading signals from

[Jeff Clark's Market Minute]( How to Profit Following the "Dumb Money" Over the past month or so, I’ve [often]( [referenced]( the trading signals from the [CBOE Put/Call ratio (CPC)](. This is a ratio that compares the number of puts traded each day to the number of calls traded. I use this information as a contrary indicator, so I tend to get more bullish as the CPC rallies (meaning investors are buying many more puts than calls). And I get more bearish as the CPC falls (meaning investors are buying many more calls than puts). The CPC has been quite a reliable indicator over the past several weeks. And that prompted the following question from a reader… Jeff, I went to the CBOE website and I see there are numerous put/call ratios, i.e. index put/call ratio, exchange-traded products put/call ratio, total put/call ratio and equity put/call ratio. As of 7/31/18 the equity put/call ratio is .69, extreme optimism; however, the exchange-traded products put/call ratio is at 1.38, extreme pessimism. The index put/call ratio is 1.21, extreme pessimism, and the total put/call ratio is 1. These are giving contradictory signals. Who’s to say which one is correct? – Edward This is a great question, Edward. The short answer is that I follow the total put/call ratio because it has the most consistent trading range and it is the most reliable contrary indicator. Recommended Link [Weird new “antennas” popping up all over America]( NASDAQ calls it: “The biggest investment opportunity in years.” These antennas have nothing to do with your cell phone. Hiding inside is the biggest hi-tech secret of the decade. [Click here to learn more.]( - Here’s the long answer… It is probably helpful to know what type of investor typically trades which type of option. For example, institutional investors tend to trade index options as opposed to options on individual equities. Institutions often buy index puts to hedge their entire portfolios, or they sell covered calls on an index in order to generate income on their portfolios. Since institutions are often seen as the “smart money” in the stock market, we can’t really use the index put/call ratio as a contrary indicator. Individual investors (aka the “dumb money”) tend to trade individual equity options. These trades are usually speculative option purchases. That’s what makes this ratio a good contrary indicator. Both institutions and individuals trade options on exchange-traded products. So, both the smart money and the dumb money are involved here. Given this information, perhaps we ought to be paying more attention to the equity-only put/call ratio (CPCE) as a contrary indicator. In my experience, though, I’ve found that the trading signals from the total put/call ratio (CPC) are more consistent. For example, I know that whenever the CPC pops above 1.20, investors are getting quite bearish and the market is likely to bounce. And when the CPC dips below 0.80, investors are too optimistic. The market is likely to decline. I’ve followed the CPC for more than 20 years. So, I’m comfortable with interpreting the signals from this ratio. The equity-only put/call ratio (CPCE) has only been around for about half as long. And the trading range seems to contract just a little every year. In other words, the trading range for the ratio gets smaller and smaller. So, it’s harder to define exactly what an “extreme” level on the CPCE looks like. Keep in mind, though, I don’t rely solely on the CPC for trading decisions. It’s only one of maybe a dozen or so daily indicators I look at. When extreme readings on the CPC confirm extreme readings on other indicators, I tend to pay closer attention to its trading signals. The bottom line is I prefer using the total put/call ratio because I can clearly define “extreme” levels on the ratio. And I’m comfortable with the reliability of the trading signals. Other analysts might have the same level of comfort and reliability following the other put/call ratios. It’s a matter of personal preference and experience. Best regards and good trading, Jeff Clark P.S. Regular Market Minute readers know that the CPC has recently [come back in favor](. And I’m excited for it to be back in my trading toolkit. It’s only part of how I find trades each week for my Delta Report subscribers. Even better, another rare market anomaly just showed up on my radar… signaling [a huge move ahead](. And I’m planning on taking advantage of it early next week. To learn more about my technique for the current market climate – and a subscription to the Delta Report – [click here](. More Mailbag Today, a response to Tuesday’s piece, “[How One Bad Idea Bought an Early Retirement]( I think it is about the fifth time I read this one. Every time I laugh out loud. We all went through something similar, in my case I am very happy I did not learn this lesson with options (so it was less painful for me, but I learned the hard way). I am using your service more for the long term than the short term. How can that be? One day I will write a longer mail to you. Keep on your good work and please continue to be the gentleman you are. – Alain And another reader, reacting to yesterday’s essay, “[Good News for Gold]( shares why they’re still holding on… I hope so, I’m lugging a dead horse around. For a long time. I increased my silver and gold holdings to nosebleed levels because of Cassandra calls for disaster looming. The “disaster” is the lack of one… and the raging bull market since Trump took power. However I do see the very clear historical markers about debt and price-to-GDP and so forth. Thus I’m sanguine and feel my holdings will save my bacon someday. The problem is gold seems to follow the dollar and sometimes it follows the markets! Confounding everyone. Will China blink first? Logic says yes. But China is a command economy and Xi doesn’t care about his people until they are in Tiananmen Square again. So maybe not. I also see HUGE risk of ETF meltdowns and how 99% of investors think ETFs are safe and simple. Wrong! The selling will be brutal when it starts as those funds unload everything in size and margin clerks roam like packs of hyenas. When? Keeps being pushed back. Supposed to be already on us. Now they say next year or 2020. The Fed is going to raise rates in September and December, Killing the economy and consumers! Yikes! So I’m holding my gold and silver stocks. – Patrick Are you holding on to gold through this downturn? As always, let us know – along with any other questions or comments – [right here](mailto:feedback@jeffclarktrader.com). We may print your letter in future editions of our Friday Mailbag… In Case You Missed It… The president did [something very unusual]( in January. The media didn’t understand it… even members of his cabinet seemed perplexed. But Jeff Brown, Bonner & Partners’ top tech expert, knows why Trump took this unprecedented step… and how it could secure America’s economic dominance for decades. [Learn more here.]( This email was sent to {EMAIL} as part of your free subscription to Jeff Clark's Market Minute. [Click Here]( to change your delivery preferences or unsubscribe. © 2018 Jeff Clark Trader, 455 NE 5th Ave, Suite D286, Delray Beach, FL 33483, USA. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from the publisher. Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. It is not designed to meet your personal situation – we are not financial advisors nor do we give personalized advice. The opinions expressed herein are those of the publisher and are subject to change without notice. It may become outdated and there is no obligation to update any such information. Recommendations in Jeff Clark Trader publications should be made only after consulting with your advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. You shouldn't make any decision based solely on what you read here. Jeff Clark Trader writers and publications do not take compensation in any form for covering those securities or commodities. Jeff Clark Trader expressly forbids its writers from owning or having an interest in any security that they recommend to their readers. Furthermore, all other employees and agents of Jeff Clark Trader and its affiliate companies must wait 24 hours before following an initial recommendation published on the Internet, or 72 hours after a printed publication is mailed.

Marketing emails from jeffclarktrader.com

View More
Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.