Newsletter Subject

What’s Next for the Buck?

From

jeffclarktrader.com

Email Address

service@exct.jeffclarktrader.com

Sent On

Tue, Oct 3, 2017 11:31 AM

Email Preheader Text

What?s Next for the Buck? The U.S. Dollar Index has rallied 2% in just over two weeks. That may no

[Jeff Clark's Market Minute]( What’s Next for the Buck? The U.S. Dollar Index ($USD) has rallied 2% in just over two weeks. That may not seem like much compared to high-flying technology stocks that can move that much in an hour (though not during the recent low-volatility environment). But in the world of currencies, a 2% move in two weeks is HUGE. The buck had been in a steep downtrend all year. We started looking for the dollar to find a bottom [in late August]( and again [in mid-September](. Both times, the $USD chart was starting to form a bottoming pattern with positive divergence on the momentum indicators. So, we figured the dollar was nearing at least a short-term low. Since then, $USD has moved sharply higher. Take a look… The buck has bounced all the way back up to where it was trading in late July. And it’s been a pretty good bounce off of the bottom. But now, the dollar is approaching resistance. And, if history is any sort of a guide, the dollar is unlikely to break through this resistance level on the first attempt. Recommended Link [An Investment Strategy for People Worried About Protecting Their Wealth in These Uncertain Times...]( Threats of nuclear war, devastation from natural disasters, geopolitical turmoil... It's normal to ask the question, "How do I protect my money?" Unfortunately, you're unlikely to find that answer in the current overvalued mainstream stock market. But there is one sector that's virtually ignored by normal "herd" investors and not only can it protect your money during uncertain times, it could just build you a million-dollar nest egg in a few short years. [Click here to learn more.]( -- Look at how a similar pattern on the chart played out in 2016. The dollar bottomed in early May last year. The rally off of that bottom ran into the resistance of a previous high. Resistance held, and the dollar fell back and formed a higher low. It took another month before the dollar was able to break out above resistance. I expect we’ll see similar action in $USD this time around as well. The buck has enjoyed a good bounce. Now, though, it’s time for a pause. The dollar is likely to pull back soon and take some time to form a higher low on the chart. A couple of weeks of back-and-forth, choppy action will help the buck build up enough energy to break above resistance on the next attempt. Best regards and good trading, Jeff Clark P.S. What are your thoughts on this year’s action in the dollar? Will we see the same sort of rebound that played out last year? Send me your thoughts, along with any other questions or suggestions, [right here](mailto:feedback@jeffclarktrader.com). Reader Mailbag In today’s Mailbag, a reader responds to yesterday’s essay on [the death of market clichés]( Jeff, very good summary of all the "known" seasonal things that don't seem to work anymore, at least this year. Two possible reasons; firstly the huge sums of money that the central banks have printed that are going into stocks because fixed-income and savings accounts pay nothing; and secondly the unrest in most of the world makes our markets look safe to outsiders causing a large inflow of funds that has to go somewhere. – David And another responds to last Friday’s essay, dealing with [the influence of market makers]( Regarding Ryan’s question as to market makers...I think that sometimes it just takes a bit of patience with them. It also helps to check volume as to trades that move the market up or down. It seems to me the market often moves considerably while only one contract has been executed, so waiting seems to help. – Phil Meanwhile, one reader took Jeff’s advice on giving trades time to work back to normal conditions… Good news, Jeff! Despite the recent put option trade falling almost immediately after your recommendation, I took [your key points]( and got in at $1.28, which is really $1.20 after the $8 commission. I can't use margin on naked puts at the two big brokers I use, so, like many of your subscribers, I need to be careful with quantity because I don't like tying up thousands of dollars just to make $100 or $200 when there are other ways to make even more. But you wrote recently about importance of selling puts to stay profitably with options and earn cash, so I'll do the ones that have a lower stock price and don't tie up as much capital. I had a feeling I could sell for $1.28 or maybe even $1.30 if I waited until end of today, using limit orders, since you explained why the market may rise or stay up till EOQ, and gold stocks tend to fall when the S&P 500 is rising and market is “Risk On.” – Tim For the past couple weeks, emails have poured in from readers asking for more of [Jeff’s insight on LEAPs]( and the best way to use them… I recently read your response to someone regarding LEAPS. This is a follow-up question. Can one use LEAPS for both calendar and strike price spreads? Also, as a general rule, is this a reasonable strategy (if numbers work out) or is this complicating things too much? I wait for your kind response. Thanks much. – Javiad Could you please write a special report on trading covered calls on LEAPs, teaching us how to select stocks and rules on what options to trade? I would be happy to pay for that. – Jr. Since "there is a little more than" you can put in a post on LEAPs, how about a special report on this idea? – Sandra Could you please provide us with some more details about LEAP strategy? Thank you very much! – Andreas Very interested in your LEAPs strategy. I wonder, if you ever have a little time, could you go into more detail about it? In particular, like where the stock will be at expiration, the dividend policy of the underlying stock, implied volatility of the options, etc. Thank you teaching me so much! – Chris Love the Delta Report and have had much success with your recommendations. I am very interested in last Friday’s essay regarding “The Best Strategy For LEAPS”. You describe this as “owning long-term calls instead of the actual shares of stock and then selling short-term calls against the long-term position.” I am very interested in learning more about this strategy. Better yet, can you take us through a couple of these on real recommendations when the setups allow? I know I’m asking a lot here, but you always deliver a lot as well! Thanks for all you are doing for us. – Tom You said: "There’s a little more to the [LEAP] strategy than I can explain in a brief essay." When you have time, please write a full description of the strategy. – Geoff Could you please write a longer essay on the strategy which you like to use LEAPs that you briefly described in your 9/15/17 essay? I use a small amount of my portfolio in call LEAPs, but I never thought of using LEAPs like selling covered calls. – P. Your suggestion of buying a long-term LEAP on a stock and selling covered calls against that instead of owning the stock and selling short terminals intrigues me, but I fail to understand exactly how the LEAP protects me against a stock jump. Please explain further. Thanks. – Leland I would really like to learn more about this bullish strategy using LEAPs… Teaching us about using LEAPS this way is perhaps beyond the scope of the Market Minute. However, it sounds awesome. How can we learn more? By the way, your trading style is particularly complimentary to that of Richard Wyckoff's price and volume analysis which I have been using for some time. I love it when several disciplines overlap! Makes for a higher-confidence trade. I’m enjoying your service very much. – David For you knowledge-hungry readers, there's good news. After seeing this rush of response, Jeff’s decided to write up a primer on his LEAP strategy insight for his Delta Report subscribers. You should be seeing that write-up within the next couple weeks… This email was sent to {EMAIL} as part of your free subscription to Jeff Clark's Market Minute. [Click Here]( to change your delivery preferences or unsubscribe. © Copyright 2017 Jeff Clark Trader. All Rights Reserved. © 2017 Jeff Clark Trader, 55 NE 5th Avenue Suite 100, Delray Beach, FL 33483, USA. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from the publisher. Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. It is not designed to meet your personal situation – we are not financial advisors nor do we give personalized advice. The opinions expressed herein are those of the publisher and are subject to change without notice. It may become outdated and there is no obligation to update any such information. Recommendations in Jeff Clark Trader publications should be made only after consulting with your advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. You shouldn't make any decision based solely on what you read here. Jeff Clark Trader writers and publications do not take compensation in any form for covering those securities or commodities. Jeff Clark Trader expressly forbids its writers from owning or having an interest in any security that they recommend to their readers. Furthermore, all other employees and agents of Jeff Clark Trader and its affiliate companies must wait 24 hours before following an initial recommendation published on the Internet, or 72 hours after a printed publication is mailed.

Marketing emails from jeffclarktrader.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

29/11/2024

Sent On

27/11/2024

Sent On

26/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.