Newsletter Subject

"Artificial Intelligence" Is Crushing Buy And Hold Investing

From

investiv.co

Email Address

support@investiv.co

Sent On

Mon, May 15, 2017 06:41 PM

Email Preheader Text

Rogue Trader Uses Artificial Intelligence To Turn $5,000 Into $15 Million That’s a 300,000% ret

Rogue Trader Uses Artificial Intelligence To Turn $5,000 Into $15 Million That’s a 300,000% return - crushing buy and hold investing. Dear Reader, What I’m about to share with you is shocking - but absolutely true. Contrary to popular opinion, the most profitable investing strategy ever has nothing to do with buy and hold or fundamentals. In fact, one Ph.D. of finance discovered this market beating phenomenon back in 1994 while completing his thesis at the University of Chicago. Today he has built one of the fastest growing hedge funds in the world amassing $42 billion in only 13 years. But he wasn’t the first to discover this incredible secret. There are a handful of ultra-wealthy, cutting-edge traders who started using it long before 1994. Their annual compound returns are simply mind boggling, far surpassing those of Warren Buffett, Carl Ichan, and David Tepper. For example... Ed Seykota turned $5,000 into over $15 million in only 15 years (300,000%) Michael Marcus turned $30,000 into over $80 million (266,000%) And John Henry used it to become a billionaire and now owns a stake in the Boston Red Sox. Their strategy is very “unorthodox.” They don’t care about balance sheets, P/E ratios, or return on equity. If you ask them, they might chuckle and tell you, “it doesn’t matter.” You see, each of these traders made their fortune as a trend following trader - allowing price and momentum to dictate all of their trading decisions. So how can you put a trend following strategy to work in your portfolio? In today’s world of algorithmic trading, it’s virtually impossible for the average investor to trend follow without the aid of a computer algorithm that detects early… and lasting trend changes. There’s too many variables to track to know which companies are seeing unusual institutional money flows, which is what creates sustainable and fast rising stock prices. My business partner Jesse Webb is an expert trend-following trader with 20 years experience. He spent more than 10 years and over $500,000 developing a web-based computer-driven algorithm which tracks institutional money flows and alerts subscribers to the strongest trending stocks in both bullish and bearish markets. Like… EVRI up 165% in 5 months KEM up 223% in 6 months LNTH up 620% in 12 months To put this Artificial Investing Intelligence to work in your portfolio risk-free for the next 90 days click[here](. Sincerely, Shane Rawlings Co-Founder, Investiv                                --------------------------------------------------------------- If you are having trouble reading this email, you may [view the online version]( This email was sent to {EMAIL} by Investiv, LLC 3400 North Ashton Blvd. | Suite 170 | Lehi | UT | 84043 [Forward to a friend]( | [Unsubscribe]( Disclaimers Investing is Inherently Risky There are risks inherent in all investments, which may make such investments unsuitable for certain persons. These include, for example, economic, political, currency exchange, rate fluctuations, and limited availability of information on international securities. You may lose all of your money trading and investing. Do NOT enter any trade without fully understanding the worst-case scenarios of that trade. And do NOT trade with money you cannot afford to lose. Past performance of an investment is not necessarily indicative of its future results. No assurance can be given that any implied recommendation will be profitable or will not be subject to losses. Hypothetical Results Are Reported Results and examples used in the Company’s advertisements, books, videos, websites, and other media—including on the Site and the Network—are, in some cases, based on hypothetical (simulated) trades. Plainly speaking, these trades were not actually executed. Hypothetical performance results have certain limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, hypothetical results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not been executed, the hypothetical results may have under-or-over compensation for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Hypothetical trading programs generally are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. Hypothetical results also do not account for commissions or slippage. The Company’s simulations assume purchase and sale prices believed to be attainable. Yet traders are going to be getting into trades at different times and using various exit approaches, which may result in different pricing and outcomes. You may or may not receive the best available price on the purchase or the sale of a position in actual trading. Information provided by the Company is not investment advice. The Company is not a registered investment adviser, stock broker, or brokerage. You agree that the Company does not represent, warrant, or take responsibility that any account will or is likely to achieve profit or losses similar to those shown. Examples published by the Company are selected for illustrative purposes only. They are not typical and do not represent the typical results of all stocks within the Company’s software or its individual scans and searches. No independent party has audited any hypothetical performance contained at this Web site, nor has any independent party undertaken to confirm that they reflect the trading method under the assumptions or conditions specified. Offers Disinterested Commentary and Analysis The Company does not receive any form of payment or other compensation for publishing information, news, research, or any other material concerning specific securities on the Network that is intended to affect or influence the value of securities. The Company, and its personnel, do not engage in front-running of recommendations and do not trade against one’s own recommendations. The Company and its management may benefit from an increase or decrease in the share prices of the profiled companies, and/or may have other actual or potential conflicts of interest. If a particular security featured in a newsletter publication is concurrently owned by the Company in its corporate brokerage account, or in any of the individual accounts of the Company’s principals or analysts / writers, that fact will be disclosed. The Company, its principals, analysts and writers may choose to purchase a security or derivative featured in one of its newsletter publications, but typically will wait three (3) trading days from the date of publication before initiating said purchase. [Disclaimers, Terms & Conditions]( | [Privacy Policy]( Copyright 2017

Marketing emails from investiv.co

View More
Sent On

31/10/2019

Sent On

25/08/2019

Sent On

18/05/2017

Sent On

18/05/2017

Sent On

18/05/2017

Sent On

18/05/2017

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.