Investiv Daily Sunday Edition

[Sunday Edition: Analysis Paralysis & Functional Investing] By Thomas Moore on January 8, 2017 Have you ever gotten caught up measuring and evaluating multiple sides to an argument or question and found yourself more confused than when you started? It can happen in just about any setting and under just about any context, and I believe that none of us are immune to it, to one extent or another. I guess that in some situations that might be a good thing, because sometimes the best action to take could be no action, but when it comes to investing, I find it to be a real hindrance. I learned to think of this phenomenon as analysis paralysis, because when it happens to me I get so caught up in weighing pros and cons, or looking for that one little piece of information that will make my decision obvious that I never actually make a decision; I feel like I can’t do anything until I have put all of the pieces of a puzzle into their proper place. When it comes to our investments, analysis paralysis shows up in a variety of ways. You might experience it when comparing two different trading opportunities, each with comparable advantages and risks. It can show up when you’re trying to evaluate broad market conditions and dealing with the imperfect and often contradictory data that you’ll usually find. And it can most certainly present itself in the emotional aspect of trying to make any investment decision, as we might be tempted to second-guess ourselves. I think one of the most dangerous times analysis paralysis can show up is when you’re trying to figure out if the market is at or near a major reversal point. It’s quite a different thing, making a decision about where to put your money when the market is moving along a clearly defined trend, than it is when the market might be getting ready to reverse in one direction or another. At these points, second-guessing ourselves becomes much easier, and it seems to be more natural to think about what you might be missing out on when your decision takes you in a certain direction. Here’s an example. Economists and analysts sometimes like to talk about opportunity cost. In the simplest terms, opportunity cost is what you give up when you decide on a specific course of action. For example, as of today, the annual yield on a 1-year Treasury bond is .89%. Comparatively speaking, 1-year certificates of deposit (CD) are offering more, with yields around 1.25%. Choosing the Treasury bond over a CD means you’re giving up .36% annually. That’s the opportunity cost of making that decision. The problem with trying to evaluate something like opportunity cost is that in the stock market, it’s almost impossible to quantify. Opportunity cost is a forward-looking concept, and the only way to measure the stock market in practical terms is on an historical basis (and as we all know, “previous results don’t guarantee future returns”). Conservative investors who believe the market is about to reverse off of historical highs might be tempted to start moving their money out of stocks and into cash because they don’t want to be caught on the wrong side of a new downward trend. The problem is if – if the market reverses and starts to drop quickly, they’ll be better off than everybody else. But if they’re wrong, and the market keeps going up, they’ve sacrificed a completely unknowable amount of continued profits. The same problem exists on the opposite side of the question. If you want to try to stay in the market for as long as possible to maximize your gains, you are at an increasing risk of being on the wrong side of things when a major market reversal comes. Staying in means you could keep making money, if the market keeps pushing your stocks higher. It also means you could lose all of the gains you might have made if the market reverses quickly against you. So where is the highest opportunity cost? In more than two decades of market and investing experience, I have yet to solve this particular problem. I don’t think anybody really ever has. The problem is that if you dwell on the question too much, you’re probably never going to be able to make a practical, useful decision. How do I deal with analysis paralysis, especially when I think the market is at increased risk of a major market reversal, and given that I know I won’t always make the right decision? When it comes to investing, I think inaction is the worst thing you can do. I don’t mean that you forge ahead and ignore risks when you can see they are there, or that you shouldn’t lessen your exposure to the stock market in these kinds of situations. Sitting in cash, if you feel that is best place for you right now, doesn’t exactly fit my description of inaction, either. To me, inaction is letting yourself get paralyzed by conflicting information to the point that you do nothing. The longer I invest in and study the markets, the more I realize that there really never is a perfect picture or set up. I can always find information that will contradict a direction I want to go. That’s true no matter whether I’m talking about broad market conditions or an individual stock to use for a put sale. If I let them, those contradictions will paralyze me and keep me from making a functional decision that will help me keep making money. As much as possible, then I try to look for a preponderance of evidence to lead me in one direction or another. If there are clearly more positives in a stock’s fundamental and value profile than there are negatives, for example, it’s pretty easy to justify making a trade, even though the stock might not fit all of the criteria I prefer to use. Analyzing broad market conditions is usually quite a bit messier than analyzing a single company, and so finding a preponderance of evidence one way or another isn’t usually as straightforward. It makes sense to implement more conservative rules about the investments you make and how you will manage them when you think overall market risk is increasing. The advantage those conservative measures gives you is the ability to keep letting the market work for you. Working with stocks that are already priced at levels that make them a bargain is another way to keep working with the market without running the risk most investors are when they buy stocks that are overextended and overpriced. It doesn’t mean we don’t take market risk, but I think it does give us a way to deal with it, and avoid having analysis paralysis hamstring our ability to make good decisions along the way. Editors Note: In the near future, Sven Carlin—fund manager, Ph.D., and daily contributor to Investiv Daily— will be launching Global Growth Stocks, a paid newsletter focused on companies perfectly positioned to profit from the fastest growing emerging markets. Developed economies have matured and growth will be slow. Countries such as China, India, Brazil, and many others will be the global economic drivers. Sven has already written four in-depth issues featuring four companies that could hand early investors gains of 300% to 500% over the next several years. These issues will only be made available to paid subscribers. If you would like to be notified when Global Growth Stocks officially launches, [please click here to be automatically added to the list.] Beta subscribers will have the opportunity to subscribe for a deep discount off the regular annual subscription rate. [No Comments »] | Filed under: [View all posts in Investing Strategy], [View all posts in Investiv Daily], [View all posts in Sunday Edition] | Tags: No Tags --------------------------------------------------------------- If you are having trouble reading this email, you may [view the online version] This email was sent to {EMAIL} by Investiv, LLC 3400 North Ashton Blvd. | Suite 170 | Lehi | UT | 84043 [Forward to a friend] | [Unsubscribe] Disclaimers Investing is Inherently Risky There are risks inherent in all investments, which may make such investments unsuitable for certain persons. These include, for example, economic, political, currency exchange, rate fluctuations, and limited availability of information on international securities. You may lose all of your money trading and investing. Do NOT enter any trade without fully understanding the worst-case scenarios of that trade. And do NOT trade with money you cannot afford to lose. Past performance of an investment is not necessarily indicative of its future results. No assurance can be given that any implied recommendation will be profitable or will not be subject to losses. Hypothetical Results Are Reported Results and examples used in the Company’s advertisements, books, videos, websites, and other media—including on the Site and the Network—are, in some cases, based on hypothetical (simulated) trades. Plainly speaking, these trades were not actually executed. Hypothetical performance results have certain limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, hypothetical results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not been executed, the hypothetical results may have under-or-over compensation for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Hypothetical trading programs generally are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. Hypothetical results also do not account for commissions or slippage. The Company’s simulations assume purchase and sale prices believed to be attainable. Yet traders are going to be getting into trades at different times and using various exit approaches, which may result in different pricing and outcomes. You may or may not receive the best available price on the purchase or the sale of a position in actual trading. Information provided by the Company is not investment advice. The Company is not a registered investment adviser, stock broker, or brokerage. You agree that the Company does not represent, warrant, or take responsibility that any account will or is likely to achieve profit or losses similar to those shown. Examples published by the Company are selected for illustrative purposes only. They are not typical and do not represent the typical results of all stocks within the Company’s software or its individual scans and searches. No independent party has audited any hypothetical performance contained at this Web site, nor has any independent party undertaken to confirm that they reflect the trading method under the assumptions or conditions specified. Offers Disinterested Commentary and Analysis The Company does not receive any form of payment or other compensation for publishing information, news, research, or any other material concerning specific securities on the Network that is intended to affect or influence the value of securities. The Company, and its personnel, do not engage in front-running of recommendations and do not trade against one’s own recommendations. The Company and its management may benefit from an increase or decrease in the share prices of the profiled companies, and/or may have other actual or potential conflicts of interest. If a particular security featured in a newsletter publication is concurrently owned by the Company in its corporate brokerage account, or in any of the individual accounts of the Company’s principals or analysts / writers, that fact will be disclosed. The Company, its principals, analysts and writers may choose to purchase a security or derivative featured in one of its newsletter publications, but typically will wait three (3) trading days from the date of publication before initiating said purchase. [Disclaimers, Terms & Conditions] | [Privacy Policy] Copyright 2016